Advertisement

Ulrich Beck’s Cosmopolitanism for Social Sciences Re-visited: Overcoming Dualisms Towards Pragmatic Ends?

  • Sirkka Komulainen
Chapter
Part of the Europe in a Global Context book series (EGC)

Abstract

This contribution aims to open up the debate about national, European and cosmopolitan identity through an interpretation of Simmel’s double boundary dialectic: human beings are boundaries and only those who stand outside their boundaries can see them as such. One difficulty with defining oneself as European stems from what could be called the “double Other” (intra- and extra-European) diachronic recognition process. Exploring the possible/impossible cosmopolitan meta-synthesis can identify certain traits of the cosmopolitan experience in Europe.

Keywords

Boundary Simmel Europe Cosmopolitan Culture Trans-cultural Trans-social 

References

  1. Alexander, J. (2006). The civil sphere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Axtmann, R. (2011). Cosmopolitanism and globality: Kant, Arendt, and Beck on the global condition. German Politics and Society, 29(3), 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck, U. (2003). Toward a new critical theory with a cosmopolitan intent. Constellations, 10(4), 453–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck, U. (2004). Der kosmopolitische Blick order: Krieg ist Frieden. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, U. (2006). The cosmopolitan vision. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  6. Beck, U. (2009). Cosmopolitanization without cosmopolitans: On the distinction between normative and empirical-analytical cosmopolitanism in philosophy and the social sciences. In K. Ikas & G. Wagner (Eds.), Communicating in the third space (pp. 11–25). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Beck, U., & Sznaider, N. (2006). Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: A research agenda. British Journal of Sociology, 57(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beck, U., & Sznaider, N. (2010). Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: A research agenda. British Journal of Sociology, 61(s1), 381–403. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2009.01250.x/full.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhabha, H. K. (2009). Preface: In the cave of making: Thoughts on third space. In K. Ikas & G. Wagner (Eds.), Communicating in the third space (pp. ix–xiv). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  11. Brown, G. W., & Held, D. (2010). The cosmopolitanism reader. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  12. Castles, S. (2014). International migration at a crossroads. Citizenship Studies, 18(2), 190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chernilo, D. (2012). Cosmopolitanism in social theory: An ambivalent defense. In R. Robertson & A. S. Krossa (Eds.), European cosmopolitanism in question (pp. 44–63). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cuomo, C. J. (2011). Climate change, vulnerability, and responsibility. Hypatia, 26(4), 690–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dallmayr, F. (2012). Cosmopolitanism: In search of cosmos. Ethics & Global Politics, 5(3), 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Delanty, G. (Ed.). (2012). Routledge handbook of cosmopolitanism studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Fine, R., & Boon, V. (2007). Introduction: Cosmopolitanism: Between past and future. European Journal of Social Theory, 10(1), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harvey, D. (2009). Cosmopolitanism and the geographies of freedom. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  19. He, B., & Brown, K. M. (2012). An empirical world of cosmopolitan Asia. In G. Delanty (Ed.), Routledge handbook of cosmopolitanism studies (pp. 427–442). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Holton, R. J. (2005). Making globalization. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ikas, K., & Wagner, G. (2009). Communicating in the third space (pp. 11–25). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Inglis, D. (2014). What is worth defending in sociology today? Presentism, historical vision and the uses of sociology. Cultural Sociology, 8(1), 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Komulainen, S. (2013). A chick cosmopolitan migrant condition. In S. Lindberg (Ed.), The migrant novel in Quebec and Scandinavia. Performativity, meaningful conflicts and creolization (pp. 161–180). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  24. Krossa, A. S. (2012). Why ‘European cosmopolitanism’? In R. Robertson & A. S. Krossa (Eds.), European cosmopolitanism in question (pp. 6–24). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lamont, M., & Aksartova, S. (2002). Ordinary cosmopolitanisms: Strategies for bridging racial boundaries among working-class men. Theory, Culture and Society, 19(4), 1–25.Google Scholar
  26. Latour, B. (2004). Whose cosmos, which cosmopolitics? Comments on the peace terms of Ulrich Beck. Common Knowledge, 10(3), 450–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Malkki, L. (2012). Kulttuuri, Paikka ja Muuttoliike (Culture, place and migration flows; SK translation). Tampere: Vastapaino.Google Scholar
  28. Robertson, R., & Krossa, A. S. (Eds.). (2012). European cosmopolitanism in question. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  29. Saito, H. (2015). Cosmopolitics: Towards a new articulation of politics, science and critique. The British Journal of Sociology, 66(3), 441–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sassen, S. (2000). New frontiers facing urban sociology at the Millennium. British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Scholte, J. A. (2000). Globalization. A critical introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  32. Skey, M. (2012) We need to talk about cosmopolitanism: The challenge of studying openness towards other people, Cultural Sociology 6, pp. 471–4487.Google Scholar
  33. Skrbis, Z., & Woodward, I. (2007). The ambivalence of ordinary cosmopolitanism: Investigating the limits of cosmopolitan openness. The Sociological Review, 55(4), 730–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stevenson, N. (2014). Human(e) rights and the cosmopolitan imagination: Questions of human dignity and cultural identity. Cultural Sociology, 8(2), 180–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Szerszynski, B. and Urry, J. (2006) Visuality, mobility and the cosmopolitan: Inhabiting the world from afar, British Journal of Sociology, 57(1), pp. 113–1131.Google Scholar
  36. Wardle, H. (2009). Cosmopolitics and common sense. Working Papers Series #1, University of St Andrews. Retrieved from http://openanthcoop.net/press/2009/10/04/cosmopolitics-and-common-sense/
  37. Weenink, D. (2008). Cosmopolitanism as a form of capital: Parents preparing their children for a globalizing world. Sociology, 42(6), 1089–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ypi, L. (2010). Justice and morality beyond naïve cosmopolitanism. Ethics & Global Politics, 3(3), 171–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sirkka Komulainen
    • 1
  1. 1.South-Eastern Finland University of Applied SciencesKouvolaFinland

Personalised recommendations