Advertisement

A Spatio-Temporal Linked Data Representation for Modeling Spatio-Temporal Dialect Data

  • Johannes ScholzEmail author
  • Emanual Hrastnig
  • Eveline Wandl-Vogt
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC)

Abstract

Collections of linguistic and dialect data often lack a semantic description and the ability to establish relations to external datasets, from e.g. demography, socio-economics, or geography. Based on existing projects—the Database of Bavarian Dialects in Austria and exploreAT!—this paper elaborates on a spatio-temporal Linked Data model for representing linguistic/dialect data. Here we focus on utilizing existing data and publishing them using a virtual RDF graph. Additionally, we exploit external data sources like DBPedia and geonames.org, to specify the meaning of dialect records and make use of stable geographical placenames. In the paper we highlight a spatio-temporal modeling and representation of linguistic records relying on the notion of a discrete lifespan of an object. Based on a real-world example—using the lemma “Karotte” (engl. carrot) we show how the usage of a specific dialect word (“Karottn”) changes from 1916 until 2016—by exploiting the expressive power of GeoSPARQL.

Keywords

Linked Data Dialect Linguistics Spatio-temporal modeling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Parts of this work were funded by Austrian Research Fund (Project Nr.: L323-G03) and Austrian Nationalstiftung (Project Nr.: DH2014/22).

References

  1. Bird S, Klein E, Loper E (2009) Natural language processing with Python: analyzing text with the natural language toolkit. O’Reilly Media, IncGoogle Scholar
  2. Birlinger A (1890) Rechtsrheinisches Alemannien. Forschungen zur Deutschen Landes- und Volkskunde 4:369–386Google Scholar
  3. Bizer C, Seaborne A (2004) D2rq-treating non-rdf databases as virtual rdf graphs. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international semantic web conference (ISWC2004), Citeseer Hiroshima, vol 2004Google Scholar
  4. Buccio ED, Nunzio GMD, Silvello G (2014) A linked open data approach for geolinguistics applications. Int J Metadata Seman Ontol 9(1):29–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chambers JK, Trudgill P (1998) Dialectology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Chiarcos C, Dipper S, Götze M, Leser U, Lüdeling A, Ritz J, Stede M (2008) A flexible framework for integrating annotations from different tools and tagsets. Traitement Automatique des Langues 49(2):271–293Google Scholar
  7. Chiarcos C, Hellmann S, Nordhoff S (2011) Towards a linguistic linked open data cloud: the open linguistics working group. TAL 52(3):245–275Google Scholar
  8. Farrar S, Langendoen DT (2003) A linguistic ontology for the semantic web. GLOT Int 7(3):97–100Google Scholar
  9. Frontini F, Gratta RD, Monachini M (2016) GeoDomainWordNet: Linking the geonames ontology to WordNet. In: Human language technology. Challenges for computer science and linguistics. Springer International Publishing, pp 229–242. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-43808-5_18
  10. Goebl H (2010) Dialectometry and quantitative mapping, vol 2, pp 433–457Google Scholar
  11. Hoch S, Hayes JJ (2010) Geolinguistics: the incorporation of geographic information systems and science. Geogr Bull 51(1):23Google Scholar
  12. Jeszenszky P, Weibel R (2015) Measuring boundaries in the dialect continuum. In: Proceedings of the AGILE conference on geographic information science 2015. Springer International PublishingGoogle Scholar
  13. Lameli A, Kehrein R, Rabanus S (eds) (2010) Language and space: an international handbook of linguistic variation: language mapping. De Gruyter MoutonGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee CY, Hsieh SK (2015) Linguistic linked data in Chinese: The case of Chinese wordnet. In: Proceedings of the 4th workshop on linked data in linguistics (LDL-2015). Association for computational linguistics and Asian federation of natural language processing, pp 70–74Google Scholar
  15. Nerbonne J (2010) Mapping aggregate variation, vol 2. Mouton De Gruyter, pp 476–495Google Scholar
  16. Nixon V, Stewart Hornsby K (2010) Using geolifespans to model dynamic geographic domains. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 24(9):1289–1308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Bauer W (1985) Wörterbuch der bairischen Mundarten in Österreich (WBÖ). Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der WissenschaftenGoogle Scholar
  18. Pi CYT (2006) Beyond the isogloss: isographs in dialect topography. Can J Linguist/Revue canadienne de linguistique 51(2–3):177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rumpf J, Pickl S, Elspaß S, König W, Schmidt V (2010) Quantification and statistical analysis of structural similarities in dialectological area-class maps. Dialectologia et Geolinguistica 18(1):73–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schmidt JE, Herrgen J (2001) Digitaler Wenker-Atlas (DiWA). Bearbeitet von Alfred Lameli, Tanja Giessler, Roland Kehrein, Alexandra Lenz, Karl-Heinz Müller, Jost Nickel, Christoph Purschke und Stefan Rabanus Erste vollständige Ausgabe von Georg Wenkers Sprachatlas des Deutschen ReichsGoogle Scholar
  21. Scholz J, Bartelme N, Fliedl G, Hassler M, Mayr H, Nickel J, Vöhringer J, Wandl-Vogt E (2008) Mapping languages–erfahrungen aus dem projekt dbo@ ema. Angewandte Geoinformatik 822–827Google Scholar
  22. Scholz J, Lampoltshammer TJ, Bartelme N, Wandl-Vogt E (2016) Spatial-temporal modeling of linguistic regions and processes with combined indeterminate and crisp boundaries. In: Progress in cartography. Springer, pp 133–151Google Scholar
  23. Sibler P, Weibel R, Glaser E, Bart G (2012) Cartographic visualization in support of dialectology. In: Proceeding AutoCarto 2012Google Scholar
  24. Wandl-Vogt E (1997) Alemannisch-Bairische Interferenzen im Dialekt des Tiroler Paznauns. Entwicklung, Verlauf, Beurteilung, Eine Annäherung an MundartgrenzenGoogle Scholar
  25. Xie Y, Aristar-Dry H, Aristar A, Lockwood H, Thompson J, Parker D, Cool B (2009) Language and location: map annotation project-a gis-based infrastructure for linguistics information management. In: International multiconference on computer science and information technology (2009), IMCSIT’09. IEEE, pp 305–311Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johannes Scholz
    • 1
    Email author
  • Emanual Hrastnig
    • 1
  • Eveline Wandl-Vogt
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Geodesy, Graz University of TechnologyGrazAustria
  2. 2.Austrian Centre for Digital Humanities, Austrian Academy of SciencesWienAustria

Personalised recommendations