Advertisement

About Realization of Aggressive Behavior Model in Group Robotics

  • Irina Karpova
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 636)

Abstract

One of the actively developing approaches of group robotics systems creation is the use of social behavior models. Aggressive behavior is one of the underlying mechanisms forming social behavior. In this paper, the application of aggressive behavior concepts is considered by analogy with animal aggressive behavior that can be used for solving tasks of group robotics. As a role model, an ant – a true social insect – is proposed. It was shown that in aggressive behavior of ants, the numerical factor and imitative behavior play an important role. Agent’s aggressive behavior model depending on accumulated aggression and the number of other nearby agents is proposed. The results of computer experiments for territory defense tasks are presented. The results show that aggression is a stabilizing factor for an approximately equal number of agents in different groups. By an increase in group size, aggression becomes a way of capturing foreign territory.

Keywords

Group robotics Social behavior models Aggressive behavior Territory defense task 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The project was partially supported by RSF 16-11-00018 grant (review and aggressive behavior model), and RFBR 15-07-07483 grant (simulation experiments).

References

  1. 1.
    Karpov, V.: Modeli social’nogo povedeniya v gruppovoy robototekhnike. (Social behavior models in group robotics). Large-scale Syst. Control 59, 165–232 (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Karpova, I.: Psevdoanalogovaya kommunikaciya v gruppe robotov (Pseudo-analog communication in robot group). Mekhatronika, Avtomatizatsiya, Upravlenie 17, 94–101 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kulinich, A.: A model of agents (robots) command behavior: the cognitive approach. Autom. Remote Control 77(3), 510–522 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tinbergen, N.: Social Behavior of Animals. Methuen, London (1953)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Olivier, B., Young, L.J.: Animal models of aggression. In: Neuropsychopharmacology: The Fifth Generation of Progress, pp. 1699–1708 (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lorenz, K.: On Aggression. Routledge, London (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shilov, I.: Population homeostasis. Zool. Zhurnal 81(9), 1029–1047 (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zakharov, A.: Muravey, sem’ya, koloniya. (Ant, family, colony). Nauka, Moscow (1978)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brown, S., Zuluaga, M., Zhang, Y., Vaughan, R.: Rational aggressive behaviour reduces interference in a mobile robot team. In: 2005 International Conference on Advanced Robotics, ICAR 2005, pp. 741–748 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang, Y., Vaughan, R.: Ganging up: team-based aggression expands the population/performance envelope in a multi-robot system. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 589–594 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Scheutz, M., Schermerhorn, P.: The more radical, the better: investigating the utility of aggression in the competition among different agent kinds. From Animals to Animats 8: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, pp. 445–454 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Frizzi, F., Ciofi, C., Dapporto, L., et al.: The rules of aggression: how genetic, chemical and spatial factors affect intercolony fights in a dominant species, the mediterranean acrobat ant crematogaster scutellaris. PLoS ONE 10(10), 1–15 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dlusskiy, M.: Muravi roda Formika. (Family Formica ants). Nauka, Moscow (1967)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gunady, M.K., Gomaa, W., Takeuchi, I.: Aggregate reinforcement learning for multi-agent territory division: the hide-and-seek game. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 34, 122–136 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Galceran, E., Carreras, M.: A survey on coverage path planning for robotics. Rob. Auton. Syst. 51(12), 1258–1276 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussia
  2. 2.National Research Center «Kurchatov Institute»MoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations