Advertisement

Narcissism Through the Digital Looking Glass

  • Jay Watts
Chapter
Part of the Studies in the Psychosocial book series (STIP)

Abstract

Ever since Lasch (1979) declared we live in a ‘Culture of Narcissism’, journalists, critics and indeed shrinks have been quick to criticise an ever-increasing puffed-up societal self-obsession. However though the term narcissism is often assumed to be an insult, a ‘personality disorder’, an illness, it is first and foremost a crucial developmental stage, and a creative one at that (Freud, On Narcissism: An Introduction. SE, XIV, 67–104, 1914). This developmental stage has often been disrupted by experiences such as trauma, abuse or displacement as well as cultural norms that have paralysed an individual’s development. Such cultural norms include presumptions of a fixed gender identity or sexuality and, indeed, a presumption that object-love is always better than self-love. However, what is missing is an understanding of how developing an idea of a self is a complex manoeuvre that can come undone as a result of traumas such as abuse or displacement. A ‘false self’ (Winnicott 1962/5) or ‘as-if self’ (Deutsch 1934) can develop through problematic early caregiving, of course, but also through growing up in an environment where one’s desires are seen as deviant (and thus suppressed). The digital world offers an opportunity for individuals to immerse themselves in a backcloth where a wider range of sexual, racial or gender identities can be validated. Narcissistic cyber-activities here are not pathological but an opportunity for the individual to go back to what some would see as the core adolescent tasks of self-development in a safer, more playful arena than that which had been experienced in local reality. Radical organisations such as the Hearing Voices Network give the most damaged spaces to play with and create a missing sense of an ‘I’ to ward off the disintegrative experiences that make psychosis dangerous rather than creative. Cyber-narcissism here is not just healthy, but life-saving. In this chapter, I will combine theorising with examples of cyber-activities from the clinic and radical organisations to bring my arguments alive. I aim to show how cyber-analysis can reconnect us with the radical Freud who saw identity development as a lifelong adventure rather than the conservative Freud who implies that progressing along developmental stages in a linear fashion is crucial to ‘healthy’ development. Cyber-analysis can rescue clinical and theoretical psychoanalysis from the vested interests that keep it in bed with ideas of ‘illness’, ‘expertise’ and ‘pathology’ that can entomb the subject as much as cure. Reclaiming narcissism as a desperate—though sometimes flawed—attempt to become may just yet show the public that psychoanalysis can dialogue with the identities movements that are shaking up what it means to be a subject in the twenty-first century.

References

  1. Akhtar, S. (2009). Comprehensive Dictionary of Psychoanalysis. Karnac Books.Google Scholar
  2. Altheide, D. L. (2000). Identity and the Definition of the Situation in a Mass-Mediated Context. Symbolic Interaction, 23(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. APA. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  4. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging Adulthood: A Theory of Development from the Late Teens Through the Twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Asai, R. (2016). Between Insanity and Love. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, 45(3), 154–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balint, M. (1960). Primary Narcissism and Primary Love. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 29, 6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Knowledge: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  8. Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1967). La construcción social. Buenos Aires: Xa Realidad.Google Scholar
  9. Butler, J. (1990). Lacan, Riviere, and the Strategies of Masquerade. In Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (pp. 55–73).Google Scholar
  10. Campbell, W. K., & Miller, J. D. (2011). The Handbook of Narcissism and Narcissistic Personality Disorder. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  11. Carpenter, C. J. (2012). Narcissism on Facebook: Self-Promotional and Anti-Social Behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(4), 482–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chamorro-Premuzi, T. (2016). Sharing the (Self) Love: The Rise of the Selfie and Digital Narcissism. Retrieved April 15, 2016, from http://www.theguardian.com/media-network/media-network-blog/2013/mar/13/selfie-social-media-love-digital-narcissism
  13. Cliff, M. (2015). Vlogger Zoella Reveals Her Daily Battle with Anxiety and Panic Attacks. Retrieved April 15, 2016, from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3081363/Vlogger-Zoella-reveals-daily-battle-anxiety-panic-attacks-html
  14. Cooley, C. H. (1902). The Looking-Glass Self. O’brien, 126–128.Google Scholar
  15. Daily Mail. (2010). Ouch, That One Hurt! Twitter-Mad Mother Sends 104 Live Updates During Birth of Her Son. Daily Mail, 10 December. Retrieved April 20, 2013, from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1337547/Twitter-mad-mothersends-104-live-updates-birth-son.html
  16. Deutsch, H. (1934). Über einen Typus der Pseudoaffektivität (“Als ob”). Internationale Zeitschrift für Psychoanalyse, 20.Google Scholar
  17. Dreyfus, H. L. (2001). On the Internet. London and New York: Thinking in Action Series.Google Scholar
  18. Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the Life Cycle; Selected Papers, with a Historical Introduction by David Rapaport. New York: International University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Fishwick, C. (2016). I, NarcissistVanity, Social Media, and the Human Condition. Retrieved April 15, 2016, from http://www.guardian.com/world/2016/mar/17/i-narcissist-vanity-social-media-and-the-human-condition
  20. Freud, S. (1905). Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality. SE, VII, 123–246.Google Scholar
  21. Freud, S. (1911). Psychoanalytic Notes on an Autobiographical Account of a Case of Paranoia. In Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud Standard Edition 12 (pp. 9–82). London: Vintage Classics.Google Scholar
  22. Freud, S. (1914). On Narcissism: An Introduction. SE, XIV, 67–104.Google Scholar
  23. Galbo, J. J., & Demetrulias, D. M. (1996). Recollections of Adults During Childhood and Adolescence. Youth & Society, 27(4), 403–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gergen, K. J. (2001). Psychological Science in a Postmodern Context. American Psychologist, 56(10), 803.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Overlook Press.Google Scholar
  26. Greenberg, E. H., & Weber, K. (2008). Generation We: How Millennial Youth Are Taking Over America and Changing Our World Forever. Pachatusan.Google Scholar
  27. Griffith, M., & Papacharissi, Z. (2009). Looking for You: An Analysis of Video Blogs. First Monday, 15(1).Google Scholar
  28. Gross, D. M., & Scott, S. (1990). Living: Proceeding with Caution. Retrieved April 15, 2016, from http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,970634,000.htm
  29. Grossman, L. (2010). Person of the Year 2010. Retrieved April 15, 2016, from http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2036683_2037183_2037185-8,00.html
  30. Harter, S. (1999). The Construction of the Self: A Developmental Perspective. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hart, S. (2014). Generation Selfie: Has Posing, Pouting and Posting Turned Us All into Narcissists? The Telegraph, 5 December. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-life/11265022/Selfie-obsession-arewe-the-most-narcissistic-generation-ever.html
  32. Hinchliffe, D. (2016). Screen Relations: The Limits of Computer-Mediated Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy. Infant Observation, 1–5.Google Scholar
  33. Hough, A. (2013). Why Women Constantly Lie About Life on Facebook. Retrieved April 15, 2016, from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/9925072/Why-women-constantly-lie-about-life-on-Facebook.html
  34. Hurst, P. (2013). Britons Spend 62m Hours a Day on Social MediaThat’s an Average One Hour for EVERY Adult and Child. Retrieved April 15, 2016, from http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/britons-spend-62m-hours-a-day-on-social-media--thats-an-average-one-hour-for-every-adult-and-child-8567437.html
  35. Inc, T. (2007). TIME Magazine Cover: It’s All About Me. Retrieved April 15, 2016, from http://content.time.com/time/covers/asia/0,016641,20070806,00.html
  36. Keen, A. (2006). Web 2.0: The Second Generation of the Internet Has Arrived. It’s Worse than You Think. The Weekly Standard.Google Scholar
  37. Keen, A. (2007). The Cult of the Amateur: How Today’s Internet Is Killing Our Culture (pp. 70–75). Crown Business, Doubleday, Random House.Google Scholar
  38. Kernberg, O. F. (1975). Borderline Conditions and Pathological Narcissism. New York: Aronson.Google Scholar
  39. Kohut, H. (1971). The Analysis of the Self: A Systematic Approach to the Psychoanalytic Treatment of Narcissistic Personality Disorders. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  40. Lacan, J. (1996). Seminar of Jacques Lacan (Vol. 7). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  41. Lasch, C. (1979). The Culture of Narcissism: American Life in an Age of Diminishing Returns. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  42. Leadbeater, C. (2009). We-Think. Profile Books.Google Scholar
  43. Leitner, J. B., & Forbes, C. E. (2014). The Role of Implicit Mechanisms in Buffering Self-Esteem from Social Threats. In Exploring Implicit Cognition: Learning, Memory, and Social Cognitive Processes: Learning, Memory, and Social Cognitive Processes (p. 183).Google Scholar
  44. Lenhart, A., Rainie, L., & Lewis, O. (2001). Teenage Life Online: The Rise of the Instant-Message Generation and the Internet’s Impact on Friendships and Family Relationships. Pew Internet & American Life Project.Google Scholar
  45. Lunbeck, E. (2014). The Americanization of Narcissism. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Maccoby, M. (2003). The Productive Narcissist: The Promise and Peril of Visionary Leadership. Broadway.Google Scholar
  47. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self and Society (Vol. 111). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  48. Mead, M., & Boas, F. (1973). Coming of Age in Samoa. Penguin.Google Scholar
  49. Mitra, S. (2009). Retailers: Embrace Web 3.0. Retrieved April 15, 2016, from http://www.forbes.com/2009/12/03/web3-blue-nile-intelligent-technology-retail.html
  50. Page, S. (2012). Sheen Tweeted in BedEx. Retrieved April 15, 2016, from http://www.nypost/com/p/pagesix/sheen_tweeted_in_bed_ex_ajY118pxLAxasvdROaFWRM
  51. Poster, M. (1990). The Mode of Information: Poststructuralism and Social Context. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  52. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Quenqua, D. (2013). Seeing Narcissists Everywhere. Retrieved April 15, 2016, from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/06/science/seeing-narcissists-everywhere.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
  54. Reeve, E. (2013). Every Every Every Generation Has Been the Me Me Me Generation. Retrieved April 15, 2016, from http://www.thewire.com/national/2013/-5/me-generation-time/65054
  55. Roberts, B. W., Edmonds, G., & Grijalva, E. (2010). It Is Developmental Me, not Generation Me Developmental Changes Are More Important Than Generational Changes in Narcissism—Commentary on Trzesniewski & Donnellan. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(1), 97–102.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Rosenberg, M. (1986). Conceiving the Self. RE Krieger.Google Scholar
  57. Rosenfeld, H. (1949). Remarks on the Relation of Male Homosexuality to Paranoia, Paranoid Anxiety and Narcissism. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 30, 36.Google Scholar
  58. Schore, A. N. (2012). The Science of the Art of Psychotherapy (Norton Series on Interpersonal Neurobiology). WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  59. Science Daily. (2013). Big Data, for Better or Worse: 90% of World’s Data Generated Over Last Two Years. Retrieved April 15, 2016, from https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/05/130522085217.htm
  60. Stein, J. (2013). Millenials: The Me Me Me Generation. Retrieved April 15, 2016, from http://time.com/247/millenials-the-me-me-me-generation
  61. Szoka, B. (Ed.). (2011). The Next Digital Decade: Essays on the Future of the Internet. TechFreedom.Google Scholar
  62. Thompson, J. B. (1995). The Media and Modernity: A Social Theory of the Media. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Turkle, S. (2009). Simulation and Its Discontents (p. 19). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  64. Twenge, J. M. (2011). Narcissism and Culture. In W. K. Campbell & J. D. Miller (Eds.), The Handbook of Narcissism and Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Theoretical Approaches, Empirical Findings, and Treatments. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  65. Twenge, J. M. (2014). Generation Me-Revised and Updated: Why Today’s Young Americans Are More Confident, Assertive, Entitled—And More Miserable Than Ever Before. Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  66. Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2009). The Narcissism Epidemic: Living in the Age of Entitlement. Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  67. Walsh, J. (2015). Narcissism and Its Discontents. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Watts, J. (2012). The Maternal Function. Journal for the Centre for Freudian Analysis and Research, 22, 112–136.6.Google Scholar
  69. Watts, J. (2014). Digital Narcissism in the Consulting Room. In Media and the Inner World: Psycho-Cultural Approaches to Emotion, Media and Popular Culture (pp. 168–184). UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  70. Watts, J. (2015). Is Mental Suffering Really ‘Just Like Any Other Illness?’ Huffington Post, 5 November. Retrieved April 15, 2016, from http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk-dr-jay-watts/mental-health-illness_b_8460340.html
  71. Waskul, D. (2003). Self-Games and Body-Play: Personhood in Online Chat and Cybersex. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  72. Whitty, M. T., & Carr, A. N. (2006). Cyberspace Romance: The Psychology of Online Relationships. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  73. Winnicott, D. W. (1960). Ego Distortion in Terms of True and False Self. The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment, 1965, 140–152.Google Scholar
  74. Winnicott, D. W. (1971). Playing and Reality. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  75. Zapała-Kraj, M. (2014). Women of 1950s. The Truth Behind White Picket Fence. USA: Grin Verlag Gmbh.Google Scholar
  76. Zhao, S. (2005). The Digital Self: Through the Looking Glass of Telecopresent Others. Symbolic Interaction, 28(3), 387–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Žižek, S. (1996). Cyberspace, or the Virtuality of the Real. In Endless Night: Cinema and Psychoanalysis, Parallel Histories.Google Scholar
  78. Zizek, S. (2004). What Can Psychoanalysis Tell Us About Cyberspace? Psychoanalytic Review, 91(6), 801.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jay Watts
    • 1
  1. 1.Clinical psychologist and psychoanalystLondonUK

Personalised recommendations