Pursuing Fundamental Advances in Human Reasoning

  • Timothy van Gelder
  • Richard de Rozario
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10414)


The IARPA CREATE program’s aim to produce “fundamental advances” in human reasoning may provide a new sufficiency test for AGI and insights for the evaluation of AGI performance. The approach of one CREATE program team, the SWARM Project, is outlined.


Reasoning Intelligence Evaluation 


  1. 1.
    Pinar Saygin, A., Cicekli, I., Akman, V.: Turing test: 50 years later. Minds Mach. 10(4), 463–518 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moon, P.: Wozniak on Apple, AI, and future inventions. In: The Washington Post (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goertzel, B.: What counts as a thinking machine–and when will we meet one? New Sci. 215(2881), 18 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity: Crowdsourcing Evidence, Evaluation, Argumentation, Thinking and Evaluation, IARPA-BAA-15-11 (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heuer, R.J., Pherson, R.H.: Structured Techniques for Intelligence Analysis, 2nd edn. CQ Press, Los Angeles (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    van Gelder, T.J.: Argument mapping. In: Pashler, H. (ed.) Encyclopedia of the Mind. SAGE, Thousand Oaks (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hanea, A.M., McBride, M.F., Burgman, M.A., Wintle, B.C.: Classical meets modern in the IDEA protocol for structured expert judgement. J. Risk Res. 9877, 1–17 (2016). doi: 10.1080/13669877.2016.1215346 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shum, S.B., et al.: DCLA meet CIDA: collective intelligence deliberation analytics. In: 2nd International Workshop on Discourse-Centric Learning Analytics, LAK14: 4th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tetlock, P., Gardner, D.: Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction. Random House, London (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Salas, E., Shuffler, M.L., Thayer, A.L., Bedwell, W.L., Lazzara, E.H.: Understanding and improving teamwork in organizations: a scientifically based practical guide. Hum. Res. Manag. 54(4), 599–622 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hackman, J.R.: Collaborative intelligence: using teams to solve hard problems. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations