Advertisement

Is the Power of Online Campaigning in Japanese Electoral Politics a Myth? A Causal Inference Analysis of the 2013 Upper House Election

  • Tetsuro Kobayashi
Chapter
Part of the Political Campaigning and Communication book series (PCC)

Abstract

Does the active use of social media for political communication during an election campaign enhance political efficacy and facilitate voter turnout? Focusing on Japan, where the ban on using the Internet for national election campaigning was lifted in 2013 for the House of Councillors elections that year, this chapter examines the causal impact of social media use for political communication on democratic virtues. Causal inference using nationally representative survey data and propensity score matching demonstrated a statistically significant positive impact of social media use on political efficacy and voting, which cannot be reliably detected with traditional ordinary least square regressions. Implications for Japanese politics are discussed.

References

  1. Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Shanto Iyengar. 1997. Going Negative: How Political Advertising Divides and Shrinks the American Electorate. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barberá, Pablo. 2015. Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together: Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data. Political Analysis 23 (1): 76–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bode, Leticia. 2012. Facebooking It to the Polls: A Study in Online Social Networking and Political Behavior. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 9 (4): 352–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ———. 2016. Political News in the News Feed: Learning Politics from Social Media. Mass Communication and Society 19 (1): 24–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bond, Robert, and Solomon Messing. 2015. Quantifying Social Media’s Political Space: Estimating Ideology from Publicly Revealed Preferences on Facebook. American Political Science Review 109 (1): 62–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boulianne, Shelley. 2011. Stimulating or Reinforcing Political Interest: Using Panel Data to Examine Reciprocal Effects Between News Media and Political Interest. Political Communication 28 (2): 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ———. 2015. Social Media Use and Participation: A Meta-Analysis of Current Research. Information, Communication & Society 18 (5): 524–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cappella, Joseph N., and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. 1997. Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Conover, Michael, Jacob Ratkiewicz, Matthew R. Francisco, Bruno Gonçalves, Filippo Menczer, and Alessandro Flammini. 2011. Political Polarization on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 89–96. Menlo Park: AAAI Press.Google Scholar
  10. Coppock, Alexander, and Donald P. Green. 2015. Is Voting Habit Forming? New Evidence from Experiments and Regression Discontinuities. American Journal of Political Science 60 (4): 1044–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dilliplane, Susanna, Seth K. Goldman, and Diana C. Mutz. 2013. Televised Exposure to Politics: New Measures for a Fragmented Media Environment. American Journal of Political Science 57 (1): 236–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eveland, William P., Jr., and Dietram A. Scheufele. 2000. Connecting News Media Use with Gaps in Knowledge and Participation. Political Communication 17 (3): 215–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gentzkow, Matthew, and Jesse M. Shapiro. 2011. Ideological Segregation Online and Offline. Quarterly Journal of Economics 126 (4): 1799–1839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gil de Zúñiga, Homero, Nakwon Jung, and Sebastián Valenzuela. 2012. Social Media Use for News and Individuals’ Social Capital, Civic Engagement and Political Participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17 (3): 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Graber, Doris A. 2001. Processing Politics: Learning from Television in the Internet Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hahn, Kyu S., Seungjin Ryu, and Sungjin Park. 2015. Fragmentation in the Twitter Following of News Outlets: The Representation of South Korean Users’ Ideological and Generational Cleavage. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 92 (1): 56–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Himelboim, Itai, Marc Smith, and Ben Shneiderman. 2013. Tweeting Apart: Applying Network Analysis to Detect Selective Exposure Clusters in Twitter. Communication Methods and Measures 7 (3–4): 195–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ho, Daniel E., Kosuke Imai, Gary King, and Elizabeth A. Stuart. 2007. Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference. Political Analysis 15 (3): 199–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holbert, R. Lance. 2005. Back to Basics: Revisiting, Resolving, and Expanding Some of the Fundamental Issues of Political Communication Research. Political Communication 22 (4): 511–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holbert, R. Lance, R. Kelly Garrett, and Laurel S. Gleason. 2010. A New Era of Minimal Effects? A Response to Bennett and Iyengar. Journal of Communication 60 (1): 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holbrook, Allyson L., and Jon A. Krosnick. 2013. A New Question Sequence to Measure Voter Turnout in Telephone Surveys: Results of an Experiment in the 2006 ANES Pilot Study. Public Opinion Quarterly 77 (S1): 106–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holt, Kristoffer, Adam Shehata, Jesper Strömbäck, and Elisabet Ljungberg. 2013. Age and the Effects of News Media Attention and Social Media Use on Political Interest and Participation: Do Social Media Function as Leveller? European Journal of Communication 28 (1): 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Imai, Kosuke, Gary King, and Olivia Lau. 2009. Zelig: Everyone’s Statistical Software, R Package. Version 3.5. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
  24. Imbens, Guido W., and Donald B. Rubin. 2015. Causal Inference in Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Iyengar, Shanto, Kyu S. Hahn, Jon A. Krosnick, and John Walker. 2008. Selective Exposure to Campaign Communication: The Role of Anticipated Agreement and Issue Public Membership. Journal of Politics 70 (1): 186–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jerit, Jennifer, Jason Barabas, and Toby Bolsen. 2006. Citizens, Knowledge, and the Information Environment. American Journal of Political Science 50 (2): 266–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kim, Yonghwan, Hsuan-Ting Chen, and Homero Gil de Zúñiga. 2013. Stumbling Upon News on the Internet: Effects of Incidental News Exposure and Relative Entertainment Use on Political Engagement. Computers in Human Behavior 29 (6): 2607–2614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kiyohara, Shoko. 2013. What Can We Do after Internet Election Campaign is Available? : Change of Japanese Election Campaigns by the Reform of the 2013 Public Officials Election Law. In Internet and Elections in the U.S., Japan, Korea: In Search of Online Public Sphere, ed. Shoko Kiyohara and Kazuhiro Maeshima, 1–19. Tokyo: Keio University Press. (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  29. Kiyohara, Shoko and Boyu Chen. 2016. Internet Election Campaigns in Japan and Taiwan: A Comparative Institutional Approach. A paper Delivered for the APSA Political Communication Preconference, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  30. Knobloch, Silvia, Matthias Hastall, Dolf Zillmann, and Coy Callison. 2003. Imagery Effects on the Selective Reading of Internet Newsmagazines. Communication Research 30 (1): 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kobayashi, Tetsuro, and Yu Ichifuji. 2015. Tweets That Matter: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment in Japan. Political Communication 32 (4): 574–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kobayashi, Tetsuro, and Kazunori Inamasu. 2015. The Knowledge Leveling Effect of Portal Sites. Communication Research 42 (4): 482–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Krosnick, Jon A. 1990. Government Policy and Citizen Passion: A Study of Issue Publics in Contemporary America. Political Behavior 12 (1): 59–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kruikemeier, Sanne, and Adam Shehata. 2016. News Media Use and Political Engagement Among Adolescents: An Analysis of Virtuous Circles Using Panel Data. Political Communication: 34 (2): 221–242.Google Scholar
  35. Kushin, Matthew James, and Masahiro Yamamoto. 2010. Did Social Media Really Matter? College Students’ Use of Online Media and Political Decision Making in the 2008 Election. Mass Communication and Society 13 (5): 608–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee, Eun-Ju, and Soo Yun Shin. 2012. Are They Talking to Me? Cognitive and Affective Effects of Interactivity in Politicians’ Twitter Communication. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 15 (10): 515–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mitchell, Amy, Jocelyn Kiley, Jeffrey Gottfried, and Emily Guskin. 2013. The Role of News on Facebook: Common Yet Incidental. Pew Research Journalism Project. http://www.journalism.org/files/2013/10/facebook_news_10-24-2013.pdf. Accessed 15 August 2016.
  38. Moeller, Judith, Claes de Vreese, Frank Esser, and Ruth Kunz. 2014. Pathway to Political Participation: The influence of Online and Offline News Media on Internal Efficacy and Turnout of First-time Voters. American Behavioral Scientist 58 (5): 689–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Neuman, W. Russell, Marion R. Just, and Ann N. Crigler. 1992. Common Knowledge: News and the Construction of Political Meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  40. Ogasahara, Morihiro. 2014. Mass Media and Political Communication via Social Media in Japan. Journal of Mass Communication Studies 85: 63–80. (In Japanese.)Google Scholar
  41. Pennington, Natalie, Kelly L. Winfrey, Benjamin R. Warner, and Michael W. Kearney. 2015. Liking Obama and Romney (on Facebook): An Experimental Evaluation of Political Engagement and Efficacy during the 2012 General Election. Computers in Human Behavior 44: 279–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Price, Vincent, and John Zaller. 1993. Who Gets the News? Alternative Measures of News Reception and Their Implications for Research. Public Opinion Quarterly 57 (2): 133–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Prior, Markus. 2005. News vs. Entertainment: How Increasing Media Choice Widens Gaps in Political Knowledge and Turnout. American Journal of Political Science 49 (3): 577–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. ———. 2007. Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shah, Dhavan V., Jaeho Cho, William P. Eveland Jr., and Nojin Kwak. 2005. Information and Expression in a Digital Age Modeling Internet Effects on Civic Participation. Communication Research 32 (5): 531–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Skoric, Marko M., and Nathaniel D. Poor. 2013. Youth Engagement in Singapore: The Interplay of Traditional and Social Media. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 57 (2): 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Skoric, Marko M., Qinfeng Zhu, Debbie Goh, and Natalie Pang. 2015. Social Media and Citizen Engagement: A Meta-Analytic Review. New Media & Society 18 (9): 1817–1839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Strandberg, Kim. 2013. A Social Media Revolution or Just a Case of History Repeating Itself? The Use of Social Media in the 2011 Finnish Parliamentary Elections. New Media & Society 15 (8): 1329–1347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stroud, Natalie J. 2011. Niche News: The Politics of News Choice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tichenor, Philip J., George A. Donohue, and Clarice N. Olien. 1970. Mass Media Flow and Differential Growth in Knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly 34 (2): 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vaccari, Cristian, Augusto Valeriani, Pablo Barberá, Rich Bonneau, John T. Jost, Jonathan Nagler, and Joshua A. Tucker. 2015. Political Expression and Action on Social Media: Exploring the Relationship between Lower- and Higher-Threshold Political Activities among Twitter Users in Italy. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 20 (2): 221–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Valeriani, Augusto, and Cristian Vaccari. 2015. Accidental Exposure to Politics on Social Media as Online Participation Equalizer in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom. New Media & Society 18 (9): 1857–1874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vitak, Jessica. 2012. The Impact of Context Collapse and Privacy on Social Network Site Disclosures. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 56 (4): 451–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vitak, Jessica, Paul Zube, Andrew Smock, Caleb T. Carr, Nicole Ellison, and Cliff Lampe. 2011. It’s Complicated: Facebook Users’ Political Participation in the 2008 election. CyberPsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 14 (3): 107–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Webster, James G., and Thomas B. Ksiazek. 2012. The Dynamics of Audience Fragmentation: Public Attention in an Age of Digital Media. Journal of Communication 62 (1): 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Webster, James G., and Shu-Fang Lin. 2002. The Internet Audience: Web Use as Mass Behavior. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 46 (1): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wolf, Michael R., Laura Morales, and Ken'ichi Ikeda. 2010. Political Discussion in Modern Democracies: A Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tetsuro Kobayashi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Media and CommunicationCity University of Hong KongKowloon TongHong Kong

Personalised recommendations