Trust in Ageing Societies: Confidence in Pensions Across Europe

  • Elias Naumann


This chapter examines how confidence in pensions across Europe changed between 2004 and 2009 and explores whether problem pressures such as population ageing or the financial crisis led to an erosion of confidence in pensions. Moreover, it examined whether there are some institutional designs and pension reforms that are able to foster trust. The results confirm the general expectation that problem pressures lead to lower confidence in pensions. Moreover, retrenchment and restructuring rather erode than foster confidence in pensions. Finally, at the individual level, a good economic situation is correlated with higher confidence in pensions, whereas unemployment risks and insecure career prospects are linked to lower confidence. The study does not find evidence that political parties or trade unions influence their members’ confidence in pensions.


  1. Agnew, J.R., L. Szykman, S.P. Utkus, and J.A. Young. 2007. Literacy, trust and 401 (k) savings behavior. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.Google Scholar
  2. Balliet, D., J. M. Tybur, J. Wu, C. Antonellis, and P. van Lange. 2016. Political ideology, trust, and cooperation in-group favoritism among republicans and democrats during a US national election. Journal of Conflict Resolution, online first. doi: 10.1177/0022002717711501
  3. Bay, A., and A.W. Pedersen. 2004. National pension systems and mass opinion. A case study of confidence, satisfaction and political attitudes in Norway. International Journal of Social Welfare 13 (2): 112–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blekesaune, M., and J. Quadagno. 2003. Public attitudes toward welfare state policies. A comparative analysis of 24 nations. European Sociological Review 19 (5): 415–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boeri, T., A. Börsch-Supan, and G. Tabellini. 2001. Would you like to shrink the welfare state? A survey of European citizens. Economic Policy 16 (32): 7–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chong, D., and J.N. Druckman. 2007. Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science 10: 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dickson, E.S., and K.A. Shepsle. 2001. Working and shirking. Equilibrium in public-goods games with overlapping generations of players. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 17 (2): 285–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duckitt, J. 2001. A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 33: 41–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Fernandez, J.J., and A.M. Jaime-Castillo. 2013. Positive or negative policy feedbacks? Explaining popular attitudes towards pragmatic pension policy reforms. European Sociological Review 29 (4): 803–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gershtenson, J., J. Ladewig, and D.L. Plane. 2006. Parties, institutional control, and trust in government. Social Science Quarterly 87 (4): 882–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gilens, M. 2001. Political ignorance and collective policy preferences. American Political Science Review 95 (2): 379–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hetherington, M.J. 1998. The political relevance of political trust. American Political Science Review 92 (4): 791–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hicks, P. 2001. Public support for retirement income reform. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hyde, M., J. Dixon, and G. Drover. 2007. Assessing the capacity of pension institutions to build and sustain trust. A multidimensional conceptual framework. Journal of Social Policy 36: 457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jacobs, L.R., and R.Y. Shapiro. 1998. Myths and misunderstandings about public opinion toward social security. In Framing the social security debate. values, politics, and economics, ed. R.D. Arnold, M.J. Graetz, and A.H. Munnell. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  17. Jaime-Castillo, A.M. 2013. Public opinion and the reform of the pension system in Europe. The influence of solidarity principles. Journal of European Social Policy 23 (4): 390–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kikuzawa, S., S. Olafsdottir, and B.A. Pescosolido. 2008. Similar pressures, different contexts. Public attitudes toward government intervention for health care in 21 nations. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 49 (4): 385–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim, S.E., and Y. Margalit. 2017. Informed preferences? The impact of unions on workers’ policy views. American Journal of Political Science 61 (3): 728–743.Google Scholar
  20. Naumann, E. 2014. Raising the retirement age. Retrenchment, feedback and attitudes. In How welfare states shape the democratic public. Policy feedback, participation, voting, and attitudes, ed. S. Kumlin and I. Stadelmann-Steffen. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 2017. Do increasing reform pressures change welfare state attitudes? An experimental study on population ageing, pension reform preferences, political knowledge and ideology. Ageing and Society 37 (2): 266–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Naumann, E., C. Buss, and J. Bähr. 2016. How unemployment experience affects support for the welfare state. A real panel approach. European Sociological Review 32 (1): 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Naumann, E., M. Hess, and L. Steinkopf. 2015. Die Alterung der Gesellschaft und der Generationenkonflikt in Europa/Aging Societies and Intergenerational Conflict in Europe. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 44 (6): 426–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. OECD. 2017. Unemployment rate (indicator). Accessed 13 April 2017. doi: 10.1787/997c8750-en.
  25. Rabe-Hesketh, S., and A. Skrondal. 2005. Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using stata. Texas: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  26. Ring, P.J. 2005. Trust in UK pensions policy. A different approach? Policy & Politics 33 (1): 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rosenberg, M. 1956. Misanthropy and political ideology. American Sociological Review 21 (6): 690–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Soroka, S.N., and C. Wlezien. 2009. Degrees of democracy. Politics, public opinion, and policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Svallfors, S. 2011. A bedrock of support? Trends in welfare state attitudes in Sweden, 1981–2010. Social Policy & Administration 45 (7): 806–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. ———. 2012. Public attitudes. In The Oxford handbook of the welfare state, ed. F.G. Castles, S. Leibfried, J. Lewis, H. Obinger, and C. Pierson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Sztompka, P. 1998. Trust, distrust and two paradoxes of democracy. European Journal of Social Theory 1 (1): 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. van Oorschot, W. 2000. Who should get what, and why? On deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the public. Policy & Politics 28 (1): 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vickerstaff, S., J. Macvarish, P. Taylor-Gooby, W. Loretto, and T. Harrison. 2012. Trust and confidence in pensions. A literature review. Department for Work and Pensions.Google Scholar
  34. Wendt, C., J. Kohl, M. Mischke, and M. Pfeifer. 2010. How do Europeans perceive their healthcare system? Patterns of satisfaction and preference for state involvement in the field of healthcare. European Sociological Review 26 (2): 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wendt, C., M. Mischke, and M. Pfeifer. 2011. Welfare states and public opinion. Perceptions of healthcare systems, family policy and benefits for the unemployed and poor in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elias Naumann
    • 1
  1. 1.SFB 884 “Political Economy of Reforms”University of MannheimMannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations