Advertisement

How to Teach and Assess Whole Number Arithmetic: Some International Perspectives

  • Jarmila NovotnáEmail author
  • Berinderjeet KaurEmail author
  • Ann Gervasoni
  • Mike Askew
  • Michiel Veldhuis
  • Catherine Pearn
  • Xu Hua Sun
Chapter
Part of the New ICMI Study Series book series (NISS)

Abstract

This chapter focusses on the diverse theoretical and methodical frameworks that capture the complex relationship between whole number arithmetic (WNA) learning, teaching and assessment. Its aim is to bring these diverse perspectives into conversation. It comprises seven sections. The introduction is followed by a narrative of a Macao primary school lesson on addition calculations with two-digit numbers, and this sets the context for the subsequent three sections that focus on the development of students’ mathematical and metacognitive strategies during their learning of WNA. Apart from examining the impact of teachers’ knowledge of pedagogy, learning trajectories, mathematics and students on children’s learning of WNA, learning theories are also drawn on to interpret the lesson in the Macao Primary School. Two interpretations of the variation theory (VT), an indigenous one and a Western perspective, provide much needed lenses for readers to make sense of the lesson. In addition, the theory of didactical situations (TDS) is also applied to the lesson. The chapter also includes a reflection on possible classroom assessment and the role of textbooks, both of which were less apparent in the lesson, for the teaching and learning of WNA.

Supplementary material

Video 11.1

(MP4 35547 kb)

Video 11.2

(MP4 53837 kb)

References

  1. Bartolini Bussi, M. G., & Sun, X. (2015). Learning from the world: The teaching and learning of whole numbers arithmetic in the ICMI study 23. In Copirelem (Ed.), Actes du 42e Colloque International des formateurs de mathématiques chargés de la formation des maîtres (pp. 39–51). Besancon: ARPEME.Google Scholar
  2. Bartolini Bussi, M. G., Sun, X., & Ramploud, A. (2013). A dialogue between cultures about task design for primary school. In C. Margolinas (Ed.), Task design in mathematics education. Proceedings of ICMI study 22 (pp. 549–558). UK: Oxford. Retrieved February 10, from https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00834054v3.Google Scholar
  3. Black, P. (2014). Assessment and the aims of the curriculum: An explorer’s journey. Prospects, 44(4), 487–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bobis, J., Clarke, B., Clarke, D., Thomas, G., Wright, R., Young-Loveridge, J., & Gould, P. (2005). Supporting teachers in the development of young Children’s mathematical thinking: Three large scale cases. Mathematics Education Research Journal., 16(3), 27–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowden, J., & Marton, F. (1998). The university of learning. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  6. Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics 1970–1990 (F. M. Cooper, N. Balacheff, R. Sutherland & V. Warfield, Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Brousseau, G., & Sarrazy, B. (2002). Glossaire de quelques concepts de la théorie des situations didactiques en mathématiques (V. Warfield, Trans.). Bordeaux: DAEST, Université Bordeaux 2.Google Scholar
  8. Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cai, J. (2004). Developing algebraic thinking in the earlier grades: A case study of the Chinese elementary school curriculum. The Mathematics Educator, 8(1), 107–130.Google Scholar
  10. Clarke, D., Cheeseman, J., Gervasoni, A., Gronn, D., Horne, M., McDonough, A., Montgomery, P., Roche, A., Sullivan, P., Clarke, B., & Rowley, G. (2002). Early numeracy research project final report. Melbourne: Australian Catholic University.Google Scholar
  11. Clements, M. A., & Ellerton, N. (1995). Assessing the effectiveness of pencil-and-paper tests for school mathematics. In B. Atweh & S. Flavel (Eds.), Galtha: Proceedings of the 18th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 184–188). Darwin: Northern Territory University.Google Scholar
  12. Freeman, D., & Porter, A. (1989). Do textbooks dictate the content of mathematics instruction in elementary schools? American Educational Research Journal, 26(3), 403–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gearhart, M., & Saxe, G. B. (2005). When teachers know what students know. Theory Into Practice, 43(4), 304–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gervasoni, A., Parish, L., Hadden, T., Turkenburg, K., Bevan, K., Livesey, C., & Croswell, M. (2011). Insights about children’s understanding of 2-digit and 3-digit numbers. In J. Clark, B. Kissane, J. Mousley, T. Spencer, & S. Thornton (Eds.), Mathematics: Traditions and [new] practices. Proceedings of the 23rd biennial conference of the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers and the 34th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (Vol. 1, pp. 315–323). Alice Springs: MERGA/AAMT.Google Scholar
  15. Gervasoni, A., & Sullivan, P. (2007). Assessing and teaching children who have difficulty learning arithmetic. Educational & Child Psychology, 24(2), 40–53.Google Scholar
  16. Grevholm, B. (2011). Network for research on mathematics textbooks in the Nordic countries. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 16(4), 91–102.Google Scholar
  17. Haggarty, L., & Pepin, B. (2002). An investigation of mathematics textbooks in England, France and Germany: Some challenges for England. Research in Mathematics Education, 4(1), 127–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huang, R., & Li, Y. (2017). Teaching and learning mathematics through variation. Confucian heritage meets Western theories. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Kullberg, A. (2010). What is taught and what is learned. Professional insights gained and shared by teachers of mathematics. Göteborg studies in Educational sciences no 293. PhD thesis, Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, Göteborg.Google Scholar
  20. Lo, M. L., Pong, W. Y., & Chik, P. P. M. (Eds.). (2005). For each and everyone: Catering for individual differences through learning studies. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Marton, F., Tsui, A. B. M., Cjik, P. P. N., Ko, P. Y., & Lo, M. L. (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  22. Mitchell, A., & Horne, M. (2011). Listening to children’s explanations of fraction pair tasks: When more than an answer and an initial explanation are needed. In J. Clark, B. Kissane, J. Mousley, T. Spencer, & S. Thornton (Eds.), Mathematics: Traditions and [new] practices. Proceedings of the 23rd biennial conference of the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers and the 34th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (Vol. 1, pp. 515–522). Alice Springs: MERGA/AAMT.Google Scholar
  23. Murata, A., & Fuson, K. (2006). Teaching as assisting individual constructive paths within an interdependent class learning zone: Japanese first graders learning to add using 10. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(5), 421–456.Google Scholar
  24. Reys, B. J., Reys, R. E., & Chávez, O. (2004). Why mathematics textbooks matter. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 61–66.Google Scholar
  25. Robitaille, D. F., & Travers, K. J. (1992). International studies of achievement in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 687–709). New York/Reston: Macmillan/National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  26. Runesson, U. (2005). Beyond discourse and interaction. Variation: A critical aspect for teaching and learning mathematics. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(1), 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schmidt, W., McKnight, C., & Raizen, S. (1997). A splintered vision: An investigation of U.S. science and mathematics education. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2014). What makes for powerful classrooms, and how can we support teachers in creating them? A story of research and practice, productively intertwined. Educational Researcher, 43(8), 404–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Selter, C. (1998). Building on children’s mathematics: A teaching experiment in grade three. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shield, M., & Dole, S. (2013). Assessing the potential of mathematics textbooks to promote deep learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(2), 183–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sowder, J., Armstrong, B., Lamon, S., Simon, M., Sowder, L., & Thompson, A. (1998). Educating teachers to teach multiplicative structures in the middle grades. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(2), 127–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Steffe, L., Cobb, P., & von Glasersfeld, E. (1988). Construction of arithmetical meanings and strategies. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sullivan, P., Askew, M., Cheeseman, J., Clarke, D., Mornane, A., Roche, A., & Walker, N. (2015). Supporting teachers in structuring mathematics lessons involving challenging tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(2), 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sun, X. (2011a). An insider’s perspective: “variation problems” and their cultural grounds in Chinese curriculum practice. Journal of Mathematical Education, 4(1), 101–114.Google Scholar
  35. Sun, X. (2011b). “Variation problems” and their roles in the topic of fraction division in Chinese mathematics textbook examples. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(1), 65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sun, X. (2016). Spiral variation: A hidden theory to interpret the logic to design mathematics curriculum and instruction in Mainland China (in Chinese). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  37. Sun, X., Neto, T. B., & Ordóñez, L. E. (2013). Different features of task design associated with goals and pedagogies in Chinese and Portuguese textbooks: The case of addition and subtraction. In C. Margolinas (Ed.), Task design in mathematics education. Proceedings of ICMI study 22 (pp. 409–418). Oxford. Retrieved February 10, from https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00834054v3.
  38. Tornroos, J. (2005). Mathematics textbooks, opportunity to learn and student achievement. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31(4), 315–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Becker, J. (2003). Towards a didactical model for assessment design in mathematics education. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 689–716). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  40. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Drijvers, P. (2014). Realistic mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 521–525). Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London: Springer.Google Scholar
  41. van Zanten, M., & van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2014). Freedom of design: The multiple faces of subtraction in Dutch primary school textbooks. In Y. Li & G. Lappan (Eds.), Mathematics curriculum in school education, advances in mathematics education (pp. 231–259). Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London: Springer.Google Scholar
  42. Veilande, I. (2014). Contemporary study of 5th grade textbooks: Tasks on whole numbers and their compliance with mathematics Olympiad content. In K. Jones, C. Bokhove, G. Howson, & L. Fan (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Mathematics Textbook Research and Development 2014 ICMT-2014 (pp. 477–482). Southampton: Southampton Education School, University of Southampton.Google Scholar
  43. Veldhuis, M., & van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2014). Exploring the feasibility and effectiveness of assessment techniques to improve student learning in primary mathematics education. In C. Nicol, S. Oesterle, P. Liljedahl, & D. Allan (Eds.), Proceedings of the joint meeting of PME 38 and PME-NA 36 (Vol. 5, pp. 329–336). Vancouver: PME.Google Scholar
  44. Veldhuis, M., & van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2015). Supporting primary school teachers’ assessment practice in mathematics: Effects on students’ learning. https://www.ris.uu.nl/ws/files/11827943/Veldhuis.pdf. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  45. Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  46. Wang, T., Cai, J., & Hwang, S. (2015). Achieving coherence in the mathematics classroom: Toward a framework for examining instructional coherence. In L. Fang, N. Y. Wong, J. Cai, & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese teach mathematics. Perspectives from insiders (pp. 111–148). Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
  47. Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2005). Mathematics as a constructive activity: Learners generating examples. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  48. Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2006a). Seeing an exercise as a single mathematical object: Using variation to structure sense-making. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(2), 91–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2006b). Variation and mathematical structure. Mathematics Teaching, 194, 3–5.Google Scholar
  50. Wright, R., Martland, J., & Stafford, A. (2000). Early numeracy: Assessment for teaching and intervention. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.Google Scholar
  51. Xin, Y. P. (2007). Word problem solving tasks in textbooks and their relation to student performance. Journal of Educational Research, 100(6), 347–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zazkis, R., & Leikin, R. (2007). Generating examples: From pedagogical tool to a research tool. For the Learning of Mathematics, 27(2), 15–21.Google Scholar

Cited papers from Sun, X., Kaur, B., & Novotna, J. (Eds.). (2015). Conference proceedings of the ICMI study 23: Primary mathematics study on whole numbers. Retrieved February 10, 2016, from www.umac.mo/fed/ICMI23/doc/Proceedings_ICMI_STUDY_23_final.pdf

  1. Alafaleq, M., Mailizar, L., Wang, Y., & Fan, L. (2015). How equality and inequality of whole numbers are introduced in China, Indonesia and Saudi Arabia primary mathematics textbooks (pp. 392–398).Google Scholar
  2. Askew, M., (2015). Seeing through place value: An example of connectionist teaching (pp. 399–406).Google Scholar
  3. Barry, A., Novotná, J., & Sarrazy, B. (2015). Experience and didactical knowledge: The case of didactical variability in solving problems (pp. 407–414).Google Scholar
  4. Bartolini Bussi, M.G. (2015). The number line: A “western” teaching aid (pp. 298–306).Google Scholar
  5. Brombacher, A. (2015). National intervention research activity for early grade mathematics in Jordan (pp. 415–422).Google Scholar
  6. Butterworth, B. (2015). Low numeracy: From brain to education (pp. 21–33).Google Scholar
  7. Cao, Y., Li, X. & Zuo, H. (2015). Characteristics of multiplication teaching of whole numbers in China: The application of the nine times table (pp. 423–430).Google Scholar
  8. Chambris, C. (2015). Mathematical foundations for place value throughout one century of teaching in France (pp. 52–59).Google Scholar
  9. Changsri, N. (2015). First grade students’ mathematical ideas of addition in the context of lesson study and open approach (pp. 60–67).Google Scholar
  10. Cooper, J. (2015). Combining mathematical and educational perspectives in professional development (pp. 68–75).Google Scholar
  11. Ekdahl, A. L., & Runesson, U. (2015). Teachers’ responses to incorrect answers on missing number problems in South Africa (pp. 431–439).Google Scholar
  12. Gervasoni, A., & Parish, L. (2015). Insights and implications about the whole number knowledge of grade 1 to grade 4 children (pp. 440–447).Google Scholar
  13. Inprasitha, M. (2015). An open approach incorporating lesson study: An innovation for teaching whole number arithmetic (pp. 315–322).Google Scholar
  14. Kaur, B. (2015). The model method: A tool for representing and visualising relationships (pp. 448–455).Google Scholar
  15. Lin, P.-J. (2015). Teaching the structure of standard algorithm of multiplication with 2-digit multipliers via conjecturing (pp. 456–463).Google Scholar
  16. Ni, Y. (2015). How the Chinese methods produce arithmetic proficiency in children (pp. 339–345).Google Scholar
  17. Pearn, C. (2015). Same year, same school, same curriculum: Different mathematics results (pp. 464–471).Google Scholar
  18. Peter-Koop, A., Kollhoff, S., Gervasoni, A., & Parish, L. (2015). Comparing the development of Australian and German children’s whole number knowledge (pp. 346–353).Google Scholar
  19. Sensevy, G., Quilio, S., & Mercier, A. (2015). Arithmetic and comprehension at primary school (pp. 472–479).Google Scholar
  20. Siu, M-K. (2015). Pedagogical lessons from Tongwen Suanzhi: Transmission of Bisuan (Written calculation) in China (pp. 132–139).Google Scholar
  21. Wong, I. N., Jiang, C., Cheung, K.C., & Sun, X. (2015). Primary mathematics education in Macao: Fifteen years of experiences after 1999 handover from Portugal to Mainland China (pp. 480–487).Google Scholar
  22. Yang, D.-C. (2015). Performance of fourth graders in judging reasonableness of computational results for whole numbers (pp. 268–275).Google Scholar
  23. Zhang, Q-P., Cheung, K-C., & Cheung, K-F (2015). An analysis of two-digit numbers subtraction in Hong Kong primary mathematics textbooks (pp. 488–495).Google Scholar
  24. Zhao, X., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Veldhuis, M. (2015). Classroom assessment techniques to assess Chinese students’ sense of division (pp. 496–503).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic, and Laboratoire “Culture et Diffusion des Savoirs”Université de BordeauxBordeauxFrance
  2. 2.National Institute of EducationNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore
  3. 3.Monash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  4. 4.University of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
  5. 5.Monash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  6. 6.Utrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  7. 7.The University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  8. 8.Faculty of EducationUniversity of MacauMacaoChina

Personalised recommendations