Behavior-State Dependent Modulation of Perception Based on a Model of Conditioning

  • Jordi-Ysard PuigbòEmail author
  • Miguel Ángel Gonzalez-Ballester
  • Paul F. M. J. Verschure
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10384)


The embodied mammalian brain evolved to adapt to an only partially known and knowable world. The adaptive labeling of the world is critically dependent on the neocortex which in turn is modulated by a range of subcortical systems such as the thalamus, ventral striatum and the amygdala. A particular case in point is the learning paradigm of classical conditioning where acquired representations of states of the world such as sounds and visual features are associated with predefined discrete behavioral responses such as eye blinks and freezing. Learning progresses in a very specific order, where the animal first identifies the features of the task that are predictive of a motivational state and then forms the association of the current sensory state with a particular action and shapes this action to the specific contingency. This adaptive feature selection has both attentional and memory components, i.e. a behaviorally relevant state must be detected while its representation must be stabilized to allow its interfacing to output systems. Here we present a computational model of the neocortical systems that underlie this feature detection process and its state dependent modulation mediated by the amygdala and its downstream target, the nucleus basalis of Meynert. Specifically, we analyze how amygdala driven cholinergic modulation these mechanisms through computational modeling and present a framework for rapid learning of behaviorally relevant perceptual representations.


  1. 1.
    Herreros, I., Verschure, P.F.: Nucleo-olivary inhibition balances the interaction between the reactive and adaptive layers in motor control. Neural Netw. 47, 64–71 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lake, B.M., et al.: Building machines that learn and think like people. arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.00289 (2016)
  3. 3.
    Disney, A.A., Aoki, C., Hawken, M.J.: Gain modulation by nicotine in macaque V1. Neuron 56, 701–713 (2007). doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.09.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rudy, B., Fishell, G., Lee, S., Hjerling-leffler, J.: Three Groups of Interneurons Account for Nearly 100% of Neocortical GABAergic Neurons (2010). doi: 10.1002/dneu.20853
  5. 5.
    Kawaguchi, Y., Kubota, Y.: GABAergic cell subtypes and their synaptic connections in rat frontal cortex. Cereb. Cortex 7, 476–486 (1997). doi: 10.1093/cercor/7.6.476 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Klinkenberg, I., Sambeth, A., Blokland, A.: Acetylcholine and attention. Behav. Brain Res. 221, 430–442 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jordi-Ysard Puigbò
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Miguel Ángel Gonzalez-Ballester
    • 2
    • 3
  • Paul F. M. J. Verschure
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Laboratory of Synthetic, Perceptive, Emotive and Cognitive Science (SPECS), DTICUniversitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF)BarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Laboratory for Simulating, Imaging, and Modeling of Biological Systems (SIMBIOsys), DTICUniversitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF)BarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.Catalan Research Institute and Advanced Studies (ICREA)BarcelonaSpain
  4. 4.Catalan Institute of BioEngineering (IBEC)BarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations