Living Machines 2017: Biomimetic and Biohybrid Systems pp 181-192 | Cite as
Reducing Versatile Bat Wing Conformations to a 1-DoF Machine
Abstract
Recent works have shown success in mimicking the flapping flight of bats on the robotic platform Bat Bot (B2). This robot has only five actuators but retains the ability to flap and fold-unfold its wings in flight. However, this bat-like robot has been unable to perform folding-unfolding of its wings within the period of a wingbeat cycle, about 100 ms. The DC motors operating the spindle mechanisms cannot attain this folding speed. Biological bats rely on this periodic folding of their wings during the upstroke of the wingbeat cycle. It reduces the moment of inertia of the wings and limits the negative lift generated during the upstroke. Thus, we consider it important to achieve wing folding during the upstroke. A mechanism was designed to couple the flapping cycle to the folding cycle of the robot. We then use biological data to further optimize the mechanism such that the kinematic synergies of the robot best match those of a biological bat. This ensures that folding is performed at the correct point in the wingbeat cycle.
Keywords
Aerial robotics Bats Biologically-inspired robots KinematicsNotes
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the team of graduate and undergraduate students from aerospace, electrical, computer, and mechanical engineering departments at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign for their contribution to construct the initial prototype of B2.
The biological motion capture data set was provided by Dr. Kenneth Breuer and Dr. Sharon Swartz from Brown University. We would like to thank them in their assistance with this, as well as José Iriarte-Díaz for compiling the data.
This work was supported by NSF Grant 1427111.
References
- 1.Bahlman, J.W., Swartz, S.M., Breuer, K.S.: Design and characterization of a multi-articulated robotic bat wing. Bioinsp. Biomim. 8(1), 016009 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Bernstein, N.A.: The Coordination and Regulation of Movements. Pergamon Press, Oxford (1967)Google Scholar
- 3.Brown, C.Y., Asada, H.H.: Inter-finger coordination and postural synergies in robot hands via mechanical implementation of principal components analysis. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 2877–2882 (2007)Google Scholar
- 4.Catalano, M.G., Grioli, G., Farnioli, E., Serio, A., Piazza, C., Bicchi, A.: Adaptive synergies for the design and control of the Pisa/IIT SoftHand. Int. J. Robot. Res. 33(5), 768–782 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Conn, A., Burgess, S., Ling, C.: Design of a parallel crank-rocker flapping mechanism for insect-inspired micro air vehicles. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 221(10), 1211–1222 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Fenelon, M.A., Furukawa, T.: Design of an active flapping wing mechanism and a micro aerial vehicle using a rotary actuator. Mech. Mach. Theor. 45(2), 137–146 (2010)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 7.Hoff, J., Ramezani, A., Chung, S.-J., Hutchinson, S..: Synergistic design of a bio-inspired micro aerial vehicle with articulated wings. In: Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS) (2016)Google Scholar
- 8.Lin, J., Wu, Y., Huang, T.S.: Modeling the constraints of human hand motion. In: IEEE Workshop on Human Motion, pp. 121–126 (2000)Google Scholar
- 9.Mueller, D., Gerdes, J.W., Gupta, S.K.: Incorporation of passive wing folding in flapping wing miniature air vehicles. In: ASME Mechanism and Robotics Conference, pp. 797–805 (2009)Google Scholar
- 10.Norberg, U.M., Rayner, J.M.: Ecological morphology and flight in bats (Mammalia; Chiroptera): wing adaptations, flight performance, foraging strategy and echolocation. Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. B: Biolog. Sci. 316(1179), 335–427 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Ramezani, A., Chung, S.-J., Hutchinson, S.: A biomimetic robotic platform to study flight specializations of bats. Sci. Robot. 2(3) (2017)Google Scholar
- 12.Ramezani, A., Shi, X., Chung, S.-J., Hutchinson, S.: Lagrangian modeling and flight control of articulated-winged bat robot. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 2867–2874 (2015)Google Scholar
- 13.Ramezani, A., Shi, X., Chung, S.-J., Hutchinson, S.: Bat Bot (B2), a biologically inspired flying machine. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 3219–3226 (2016)Google Scholar
- 14.Ramezani, A., Shi, X., Chung, S.-J., Hutchinson, S.: Modeling and nonlinear flight controller synthesis of a bat-inspired micro aerial vehicle. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, p. 1376 (2016)Google Scholar
- 15.Riskin, D.K., Bergou, A., Breuer, K.S., Swartz, S.M.: Upstroke wing flexion and the inertial cost of bat flight. Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. B: Biolog. Sci 279(1740), 2945–2950 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Riskin, D.K., Willis, D.J., Iriarte-Díaz, J., Hedrick, T.L., Kostandov, M., Chen, J., Laidlaw, D.H., Breuer, K.S., Swartz, S.M.: Quantifying the complexity of bat wing kinematics. J. Theor. Biol. 254(3), 604–615 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Santello, M., Flanders, M., Soechting, J.F.: Postural hand synergies for tool use. J. Neurosci. 18(23), 10105–10115 (1998)Google Scholar
- 18.Stowers, A.K., Lentink, D.: Folding in and out: passive morphing in flapping wings. Bioinsp. Biomim. 10(2), 025001 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Wissa, A., Tummala, Y., Hubbard, J., Frecker, M.: Passively morphing ornithopter wings constructed using a novel compliant spine: design and testing. Smart Mater. Struct. 21(9), 094028 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Zbikowski, R., Galinski, C., Pedersen, C.B.: Four-bar linkage mechanism for insectlike flapping wings in hover: Concept and an outline of its realization. Trans. ASME: J. Mech. Des. 127(4), 817–824 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar