Advertisement

Extraperitoneal Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy by Robot-Assisted Laparoscopy (S, SI, and XI Systems)

  • Fabrice NarducciEmail author
  • Lucie Bresson
  • Delphine Hudry
  • Eric Leblanc
Chapter

Abstract

Background

Here, we report the use of extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy by robot-assisted laparoscopy in one cancer center.

Materials and Methods

Forty-one consecutive patients were described: 31 patients with the S system from Da Vinci and 10 with the Xi system.

Results

Forty-one consecutive patients were analyzed (51 years, BMI 28) with the following types of cancer: cervical cancer (n = 27), endometrial cancer (n = 9), adnexal cancer (n = 4), and vaginal cancer (n = 1). Operative time, estimated blood loss, and the mean number of para-aortic lymph nodes resected were 207.2 (±61.2), 104.8 mL (±126.8 mL), and 19.7 (±10.5), respectively.

There was one failure with pneumoperitoneum in an obese patient without the possibility of transperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Two other patients had failure with pneumoperitoneum, but they underwent transperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy by robot-assisted laparoscopy. One patient had hemorrhage lateral to the IMA, so we used extraperitoneal laparoscopy for coagulation (hemorrhage, 600 mL, but no transfusion).

With a follow-up of 33 months, we reported 32% of postoperative complications, such as drainage of lymphocysts, lymphedema, and dysesthesia.

Conclusion

Extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy by robot-assisted laparoscopy exhibited rates of failure, preoperative complications, and postoperative complications of 2.5%, 2.5%, and 32%, respectively. Peritoneal marsupialization could be useful to reduce symptomatic lymphocysts, except in cases of macroscopically involved para-aortic lymph nodes.

Keywords

Para-aortic lymphadenectomy Extraperitoneal laparoscopy Learning curve Gynecologic oncology Robot-assisted laparoscopy 

Supplementary material

Video 18.1

Robot extra Ao-placement of ballon trocar Film 18.1 (MOV 56168 kb)

Video 18.2

Robot extra Ao-placement of others trocars Film 18.2 (MOV 94374 kb)

Video 18.3

Extraperitoneal aortic robot Xi increase in the extra extraperitoneal space and placement of the cephalic 8-mm trocar and the 12-mm assistant trocar Film 18.3 (M4V 328880 kb)

Video 18.4

Extraperitoneal aortic robot Xi targeting Film 18.4 (M4V 24427 kb)

Video 18.5

Extraperitoneal aortic robot Xi left interiliac bifurcation and left ureter Film 18.5 (M4V 126482 kb)

Video 18.6

Extraperitoneal aortic robot Xi left renal vein Film 18.6 (M4V 330705 kb)

Video 18.7

Extraperitoneal aortic robot Xi common iliac arteries and aortic bifurcation Film 18.7 (M4V 151251 kb)

Video 18.8

Extraperitoneal aortic robot Xi right interiliac bifurcation right ureter Film 18.8 (M4V 83074 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Querleu D, Leblanc E, Castelain B. Laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy in the staging of early carcinoma of the cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;164:579–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dargent D, Ansquer Y, Mathevet P. Technical development and results of left extraperitoneal laparoscopic paraaortic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;77:87–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Leblanc E, Narducci F, Frumovitz M, et al. Therapeutic value of pretherapeutic extraperitoneal laparoscopic staging of locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;105:304–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vergote I, Pouseele B, Van Gorp T, et al. Robotic retroperitoneal lower para-aortic lymphadenectomy in cervical carcinoma: first report on the technique used in 5 patients. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87:783–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Magrina JF, Kho R, Montero RP, et al. Robotic extraperitoneal aortic lymphadenectomy: development of a technique. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;113:32–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Narducci F, Lambaudie E, Houvenaeghel G, et al. Early experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopy for extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy up to the left renal vein. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;115:172–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fastrez M, Goffin F, Vergote I, et al. Multi-center experience of robot-assisted laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy for staging of locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92:895–901.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Diaz-Feijoo B, Gil-Ibanez B, Pe’rez-Benavente A, et al. Comparison of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopy for extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;132:98–101.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bats AS, Mimouni M, Bensaid C, et al. Robotic extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in gynecological cancers: feasibility, safety, and short-term outcomes of isolated and combined procedures. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014;24:1486–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Narducci F, Lambaudie E, Mautone D, Hudry D, Bresson L, Leblanc E. Extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy by robot-assisted laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015;25:1494–502.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leblanc E, Katdare N, Narducci F, Bresson L, Gouy S, Morice P, Ferron G, Querleu D, Martinez A. Should systematic infrarenal para-aortic dissection be the rule in the pretherapeutic staging of primary or recurrent locally advanced cervix cancer patients with a negative preoperative para-aortic PET imaging? Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016;26:169–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lambaudie E, Narducci F, Leblanc E, et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopy for paraaortic lymphadenectomy: technical description and results of an initial experience. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:2430–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kazaryan A, Rosok B, Edwin B. Morbidity assessment in surgery: refinement proposal based on a concept of perioperative adverse events. ISRN Surg. 2013; article ID 625093, 7 pages.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fabrice Narducci
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lucie Bresson
    • 1
  • Delphine Hudry
    • 1
  • Eric Leblanc
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Gynecologic OncologyCancer Center Oscar LambretLille CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations