Advertisement

Pelvic Lymphadenectomy

  • Jordi PonceEmail author
  • Marc Barahona
  • M. Jesus Pla
Chapter

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to describe the technique tips and tricks of robotic pelvic lymphadenectomy. We explain the differences between the Da Vinci S ® , Da Vinci Si ® and Da Vinci Xi ® systems, docking and instruments. We also describe the boundaries of dissection and surgical technique. We explain our methodology step by step and include pictures and videos. We also detail possible complications and their resolution.

Keywords

Pelvic lymphadenectomy Robotic surgery DaVinci 

Supplementary material

Video 16.1

Da Vinci S ® conventional docking (MP4 58923 kb)

Video 16.2

Da Vinci Xi ® double docking (MP4 42533 kb)

Video 16.3

Starting dissection from superior vesical artery (MP4 312940 kb)

Video 16.4

Dissection on external iliac vessels (MP4 393105 kb)

Video 16.5

Lateral approach to the obturator fossa (MP4 198916 kb)

Video 16.6

Lymph node dissection and extraction (MP4 186661 kb)

Video 16.7

Final visualisation of the dissected field (MP4 104911 kb)

Video 16.8

Vascular injury and suture (MP4 103283 kb)

Video 16.9

Obturator nerve suture (MP4 107747 kb)

Video 16.10

Sentinel node by ICG and Firefly ® system (MP4 81781 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Balasubramani L, Milliken DA, Shepherd JH, Ind TEJ. Differences in hand movements and task completion times between laparoscopic, robotically assisted, and open surgery: An in vitro study. J Robot Surg. 2011;5(2):137–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rashid T, Kini M, Ind TEJ. Comparing the learning curve for robotically assisted and straight stick laparoscopic procedures in surgical novices. Int J Med Robot. 2010;6:306–3010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Magrina JF. Robotic surgery in gynecology. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2007;28(2):77–82. Epub 2007/05/08.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Magrina JF, Long JB, Kho RM, Giles DL, Montero RP, Magtibay PM. Robotic transperitoneal infrarenal aortic lymphadenectomy: technique and results. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010;20(1):184–7. Epub 2010/02/05.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ponce J, Barahona M, Marti MD, Pla MJ, Gine L, Pola E, Salazar A, Bartolome C, Corbella X, García A. Combined robotic procedures, pelvis and upper abdomen. Standardization with two surgical approaches: high aorto-cava limphadenectomy by transperitoneal robotic approach using double docking and 180° rotation of operation table. J Robot Surg. 2012;6(Sup 1):S13.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hudry D, Ahmad S, Zanagnolo V, Narducci F, Fastrez M, Ponce J, Tucher E, Lecuru F, Conri V, Leguevaque P, Goffin F, Kolher C, Leblanc E, Maggioni A, Holloway RW, Houvenaeghel G, Lambaudie E. Robotic-assisted para-aortic lymphadenectomy: surgical results. J Robot Surg. 2012;6(Suppl 1):S11.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fastrez M, Goffin F, Vergote I, Vandromme J, Petit P, Leunen K, et al. Multi-center experience of 331 robot-assisted laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy for staging of locally advanced cervical 332 carcinoma. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92:895–901.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zanagnolo V, Rollo D, Tomaselli T, et al. Robotic-assisted transperitoneal aortic lymphadenectomy as part of staging procedure for gynaecological malignancies: single institution experience. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2013;2013:931318.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brown JV III, Mendivil AA, Abaid LN, Rettenmaier MA, Micha JP, Wabe MA, et al. The safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted lymph node staging in early-stage ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014;24(8):1493–8. Epub 2014/08/01.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hudry D, Ahmad S, Zanangnolo V, Narducci F, Fastrez M, Ponce J, Tucher F, Lécuru F, Conri V, Leguevaque P, Goffin F, Holloway RW, Lambaudie E. With the collaboration of the SERGS group. Robotically assisted paraaortic lymphadenectomy: surgical results in a cohort study of 487 patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015;25:504–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Franke O, Narducci F, Chereau-Ewald E, et al. Role of a double docking to improve lymph node dissection: when robotically assisted laparoscopy for para-aortic lymphadenectomy is associated to a pelvic procedure. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015;25:331–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ponce J, Barahona M, Pla MJ, Rovira J, Gil-Ibañez B, Gaspar HM, Sabria E, Bartolome C, Marti L. Robotic transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy with double docking: technique, learning curve and perioperative outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23(4):622–7. DOI  10.1016/j.jmig.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Feb 16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University Hospital of Bellvitge (IDIBELL)University of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations