Advertisement

Indagante: A Proposal for a Social Multiplatform Game to Motivate Interaction in the Living Room

  • Bernardo Cardoso
  • Jorge Ferraz de Abreu
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 689)

Abstract

Nowadays, the access to new personal and portable digital equipment capable to reproduce all kinds of media content is getting increasingly easy. However, the presence of these new devices in the living room resulted in family members sharing the same physical space but not talking to each other. In this article, we intend to highlight these observations, as well to present a proposal based on a digital game, associated with television content, which has the potential to create an effect of discussion and conversation between those present in the living room. We will also highlight the way this game and its dynamics were designed, with the Interaction Design process in mind, to allow the game to reach its full potential: be fun and breed discussion.

Keywords

Games Living room TV Quiz Interaction design 

References

  1. 1.
    Lull, J.: The social uses of television. Hum. Commun. Res. 6, 197–209 (1980). doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1980.tb00140.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Turkle, S.: Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Basic Books Inc., New York (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ley, B., Ogonowski, C., Hess, J., et al.: Impacts of new technologies on media usage and social behaviour in domestic environments. Behav. Inf. Technol. 33, 815–828 (2014). doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2013.832383 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wilson, S.: In the living room: second screens and TV audiences. Telev. New Media 17, 174–191 (2015). doi: 10.1177/1527476415593348 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McGill, M., Williamson, J.H., Brewster, S.A.: A review of collocated multi-user TV: Examining the changing role of the TV in the multi-viewer, multi-screen home. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 19, 743–759 (2015). doi: 10.1007/s00779-015-0860-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ofcom: Communications Market Report (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deloitt: Digital Democracy Survey A multi-generational view of consumer technology, media and telecom trends (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Turkle, S.: Reclaiming Conversation: The Power of Talk in a Digital Age. Penguin Publishing Group (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lucero, A., Jones, M., Jokela, T., Robinson, S.: Mobile collocated interactions: taking an offline break together. Interactions 20, 26–32 (2013). doi: 10.1145/2427076.2427083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Geerts, D., Cesar, P., Bulterman, D.: The implications of program genres for the design of social television systems. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Designing Interactive User Experiences for TV and Video (UXTV 2008), pp. 71–80 (2008). doi: 10.1145/1453805.1453822
  11. 11.
    Almeida, P., Ferraz, J., Pinho, A., Costa, D.: Engaging viewers through social TV games. In: Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video, EuroiTV 2012, pp. 175–183 (2012). doi: 10.1145/2325616.2325651
  12. 12.
    Miller, M.: Game show classroom: Comparing Kahoot!, Quizizz, Quizlet Live and Quizalize. http://ditchthattextbook.com/2016/04/21/game-show-classroom-comparing-kahoot-quizizz-quizlet-live-and-quizalize/. Accessed 24 Jan 2017
  13. 13.
    Wang, A.I.: The wear out effect of a game-based student response system. Comput. Educ. 82, 217–227 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Monterosa: TV proves its digital influence again as Monterosa’s new Play-Along app for Cue The Music TV show hits the No. 1 App Store spot in Portugal (2017). https://www.monterosa.co/newslist/2017/1/18/cuethemusic-portugal. Accessed 10 Feb 2017
  15. 15.
    Preece, J., Sharp, H., Rogers, Y.: Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction, 4th edn. Wiley (2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Morville, P., Rosenfeld, L.: Information Architecture for the World Wide Web, 3rd edn. O’Reilly (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Seyler, D., Yahya, M., Berberich, K.: Knowledge Questions from Knowledge Graphs. ArXiv e-prints (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Norman, D.A.: The design of everyday things, Revised an. Basic Books (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Adams, E.: Fundamentals of Game Design, 2nd edn. (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Abreu, J., Almeida, P., Silva, T., Aresta, M.: Notifications efficiency, impact, and interference in second-screen scenarios. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. (2016). doi: 10.1080/10447318.2016.1210870 Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang, A.I., Øfsdahl, T., Mørch-Storstein, O.K.: An evaluation of a mobile game concept for lectures. Software Engineering Education Conference Proceedings, pp. 197–204 (2008). doi: 10.1109/CSEET.2008.15
  22. 22.
    Salen, K., Zimmerman, E.: Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals (2004)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Følstad, A.: Living labs for innovation and development of information and communication technology: a literature review. Electron. J. Virtual Organ. Netw. 10, 99–131 (2008)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nielsen, J.: Usability 101: Introduction to Usability (2012)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Abreu, J., Almeida, P., Silva, T.: A UX evaluation approach for second-screen applications. Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci. 605, 105–120 (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-38907-3_9 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of AveiroAveiroPortugal

Personalised recommendations