Effective Iris Recognition for Distant Images Using Log-Gabor Wavelet Based Contourlet Transform Features

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10361)

Abstract

Distant iris recognition has become an active research topic in biometric as well as computer vision, but it is still a very challenging problem. In order to solve it effectively, we propose a novel framework by utilizing Log-Gabor wavelet based Contourlet transform (LGCT) feature descriptor with an effective kernel based extreme learning machine (KELM) classifier. The experiments are conducted on CASIA-v4 which is a typical database of distant iris images. It is demonstrated by the experimental results that our proposed LGCT features are quite effective for distant iris recognition and the highest accuracy can arrive at 95.93% when they are fused with the convolutional neural networks (CNN) and gradient local auto-correlations (GLAC) features together.

Keywords

Iris recognition Distant iris image Log-Gabor wavelet Contourlet transform CNN KELM 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China for Grant 61171138. We also acknowledge the Institute of Automation (Chinese Academy of Science, China) for the contributions of the database employed in this work.

References

  1. 1.
    Daugman, J.G.: Biometric personal identification system based on iris analysis. United States Patent, Patent Number: 5291560 (1994)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boles, W., Boashash, B.: A human identification techniques using images of the iris and wavelet transform. IEEE Trans. Sig. Process. 46(4), 1185–1188 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Daugman, J.G.: How iris recognition works. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Video Technol. 14(1), 21–30 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Seung-In, N., Bae, K., Park, Y., Kim, J.: A novel method to extract features for iris recognition system. In: Kittler, J., Nixon, M.S. (eds.) AVBPA 2003. LNCS, vol. 2688, pp. 862–868. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). doi: 10.1007/3-540-44887-X_100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Monro, D.M., Rakshit, S., Zhang, D.: DCT-based iris recognition. IEEE Trans. PAMI 29(4), 586–595 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    He, Z., Tan, T., Sun, Z., Qiu, X.: Toward accurate and fast iris segmentation for iris biometrics. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 31(9), 1670–1684 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kumar, A., Passi, A.: Comparison and combination of iris matchers for reliable personal authentication. Pattern Recogn. 43(3), 1016–1026 (2010)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fancourt, C., Bogoni, L., Hanna, K., Guo, Y., Wildes, R., Takahashi, N., Jain, U.: Iris recognition at a distance. In: Kanade, T., Jain, A., Ratha, N.K. (eds.) AVBPA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3546, pp. 1–13. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). doi: 10.1007/11527923_1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tan, C.-W., Kumar, A.: Unified frame work for automated iris segmentation using distantly acquired face image. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 21(9), 4068–4078 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tan, C.-W., Kumar, A.: Efficient iris segmentation using grow-cut algorithm for remotely acquired iris images. In: 15th International Conference on BTAS, pp. 99–104. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tan, C.-W., Kumar, A.: Towards online iris and periocular recognition under relaxed imaging constraints. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 22(10), 3751–3765 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kumar, A., Chan, T.-S.: Iris recognition using quaternionic sparse orientation code (QSOC). In: Proceedings of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), pp. 56–64 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tan, C.-W., Kumar, A.: Accurate iris recognition at a distance using stabilized iris encoding and zernike moments phase features. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 23(9), 3962–3974 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hollingsworth, K.P., Bowyer, K.W., Flynn, P.J.: The best bits in an iris code. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 31(6), 964–973 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wenbo, D., Zhenan, S., Tieniu, T.: Iris matching based on personalized weight map. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 33(9), 1744–1757 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kobayashi, T., Otsu, N.: Image feature extraction using gradient local auto-correlations. In: Forsyth, D., Torr, P., Zisserman, A. (eds.) ECCV 2008. LNCS, vol. 5302, pp. 346–358. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-88682-2_27 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ali, L.E., Luo, J., Ma, J.: Iris recognition from distant images based on multiple feature descriptors and classifiers. In: Proceedings of IEEE 13th International Conference on Signal Processing (ICSP), pp. 1357–1362 (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Field, D.: Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 4(12), 2379–2394 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Do, M.N., Vetterli, M.: The Contourlet transform: an efficient directional multiresolution image representation. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 14(12), 2091–2106 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Huang, G.-B., Zhou, H., Ding, X., Zhang, R.: Extreme learning machine for regression and multiclass classification. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 42(2), 513–529 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
    Jia, Y., Shelhamer, E., Donahue, J., Karayev, S., Long, J., Girshick, R., Guadarrama, S., Darrell, T.: Caffe: Convolutional architecture for fast feature embedding. arXiv preprint arXiv:14085093 (2014)
  23. 23.
    Kobayashi, T., Otsu, N.: Motion recognition using local auto-correlation of space-time gradient. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 33, 1188–1195 (2012). ElsevierCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information Science, School of Mathematical Sciences and LMAMPeking UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations