Public Value Co-creation via Gov2.0 Complexity Cube

  • Mohammed Aladalah
  • Yen Cheung
  • Vicent C. S. Lee
  • Sultan Alamri


Whilst digital connectivity via platforms such as Gov2.0 has provided huge opportunities for governments and citizens to interact and create public value, actual usage of these platforms is below expectations. This chapter explains the complexity of government-citizen interactions using a co-creation perspective via the proposed Gov2.0 complexity cube. The chapter discusses the results of Australian government agencies’ (Government dimension) use of Twitter to identify the co-creation modes. Via the proposed Gov2.0 complexity cube, the degree and understanding of co-creation in the Gov2.0 context can be enhanced. Further testing of the Gov2.0 complexity cube involves validating the other two dimensions, i.e. community and citizens, to reveal other types of co-creation.


  1. Aladalah, M., Cheung, Y., & Lee, V. (2014). Towards sustainability of Emarket places. Proceedings of the 18th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, (PACIS 2014, 24–28 June), Chengdu, China.Google Scholar
  2. Aladalah, M., Cheung, Y., & Lee, V. (2015a). GOV2.0: A service science perspective. Proceedings of the 19th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, (PACIS 2015, 5–9 July), Singapore.Google Scholar
  3. Aladalah, M., Cheung, Y., & Lee, V. (2015b). Enabling citizen participation in Gov 2.0: An empowerment perspective. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 13(2), 77–93.Google Scholar
  4. Aladalah M., Cheung, Y., & Lee, V. (2016a). Delivering public value: Synergistic integration via Gov 2.0. Paper presented at the 49th Hawaii International Conference System Sciences (HICSS 2016, January 5–8), Hawaii.Google Scholar
  5. Aladalah, M., Cheung, Y., & Lee, V. (2016b). Winning digital citizens: A model and instrument. Paper presented at the 20th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, (PACIS 2016, June 27–July 1), Chiayi, Taiwan.Google Scholar
  6. Alford, J., & O’Flynn, J. (2009). Making sense of public value: Concepts, critiques and emergent meanings. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3–4), 171–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Andersen, K. N., Henriksen, H. Z., Medaglia, R., Danziger, J. N., Sannarnes, M. K., & Enemærke, M. (2010). Fads and facts of e-government: A review of impacts of egovernment (2003–2009). International Journal of Public Administration, 33(11), 564–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. August, K., Kern, T., & Moran, E. (2007). Are you ready for the future of media? Highlights from Deloitte’s 2007 state of the media democracy survey. Retrieved July 15, 2016, from
  10. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2016). Household use of information technology, Australia, 2014–15. Retrieved July 15, 2016, from
  11. Australian Electoral Commission AEC. (2014). Three levels of government. Retrieved July 15, 2016, from
  12. Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2014). ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for research. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Benington, J. (2009). Creating the public in order to create public value? International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3–4), 232–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2012). Promoting transparency and accountability through ICTs, social media, and collaborative e-government. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 6(1), 78–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bonsón, E., Torres, L., Royo, S., & Flores, F. (2012). Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Borzaga, C., & Defourny, J. (2004). The emergence of social enterprise (Vol. 4). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brabham, D. C. (2009). Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects. Planning Theory, 8(3), 242–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bryer, T. A., & Zavattaro, S. M. (2011). Social media and public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 33(3), 325–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Burby, R. J. (2003). Making plans that matter: Citizen involvement and government action. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(1), 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Burris, E. R. (2016). Can your employees really speak freely? Harvard Business Review, 94(1), 80–87.Google Scholar
  22. eC3. (2007). Government in the age of YouTube: The implications of internet social networks to government. eC3 Symposium White Paper, presented at the 2007 eC3 Annual Conference, December 3–5, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
  23. Ceccagnoli, M., Forman, C., Huang, P., & Wu, D. J. (2012). Co-creation of value in a platform ecosystem: The case of enterprise software. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 263–290.Google Scholar
  24. Center for Technology in Government. (2009). Exploratory social media project. Retrieved August 4, 2017, from
  25. Chang, A.-M., & Kannan, P. K. (2008). Leveraging Web 2.0 in government. E-Government/Technology Series, IBM Center for the Business of Government, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  26. Choudary, S. P., Van Alstyne, M. W., & Parker, G. G. (2016). Platform revolution: How networked markets are transforming the economy—And how to make them work for you. New York: WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  27. Criado, J. I., Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2013). Government innovation through social media. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 319–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dart, R. (2004). The legitimacy of social enterprise. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14(4), 411–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Defourny, J. (2001). From third sector to social enterprise. The emergence of social enterprise.Google Scholar
  30. Department for Trade and Industry (DTI). (2002). Social enterprise: A strategy for success. London: Department for Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
  31. Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2016). Can your employees really speak freely? Harvard Business Review, 94(1–2), 80–87.Google Scholar
  32. Di Maio, A. (2007). Gartner publication. What does Web 2.0 mean to government? Retrieved October 15, 2016, from https://www.gartnercom/doc/501956/does-web-mean-government
  33. Ferro, E., & Molinari, F. (2010). Making sense of Gov 2.0 strategies: “No citizens, no party”. JeDEM-eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 2(1), 56–68.Google Scholar
  34. Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Martinez-Moyano, I. J. (2007). Understanding the evolution of egovernment: The influence of systems of rules on public sector dynamics. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), 266–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Golbeck, J., Grimes, J. M., & Rogers, A. (2010). Twitter use by the US Congress. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(8), 1612–1621.Google Scholar
  36. Grover, V., & Kohli, R. (2012). Cocreating IT value: New capabilities and metrics for multifirm environments. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 225–232.Google Scholar
  37. Hand, L. C., & Ching, B. D. (2011). “You have one friend request”: An exploration of power and citizen engagement in local governments’ use of social media. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 33(3), 362–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Holden, S. H., Norris, D. F., & Fletcher, P. D. (2003). Electronic government at the local level: Progress to date and future issues. Public Performance & Management Review, 26, 325–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Honeycutt, C., & Herring, S. C. (2009). Beyond microblogging: Conversation and collaboration via Twitter. Paper presented at the 42th Hawaii International Conference System Sciences (HICSS, January), Hawaii.Google Scholar
  40. Islam, M. S. (2008). Towards a sustainable e-Participation implementation model. European Journal of ePractice, 5(10), 1–12.Google Scholar
  41. Jaeger, P. T. (2003). The endless wire: E-government as global phenomenon. Government Information Quarterly, 20(4), 323–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., & Tseng, B. (2007). Why we twitter: Understanding microblogging usage and communities. In Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web mining and social network analysis (pp. 56–65).Google Scholar
  43. Kaplan, D. (2005). e-Inclusion: New challenges and policy recommendations. Brussels: eEurope Advisory Group.Google Scholar
  44. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kavanaugh, A. L., Fox, E. A., Sheetz, S. D., Yang, S., Li, L. T., Shoemaker, D. J., Natsev, A., & Xie, L. (2012). Social media use by government: From the routine to the critical. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 480–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kelly, G., Mulgan, G., & Muers, S. (2002). Creating public value: An analytical framework for public service reform. London: Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office.Google Scholar
  47. Kohli, R., & Grover, V. (2008). Business value of IT: An essay on expanding research directions to keep up with the times. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(1), 23.Google Scholar
  48. Le Grand, J. (2009). The other invisible hand: Delivering public services through choice and competition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Linders, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 446–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lindgren, I., & Jansson, G. (2013). Electronic services in the public sector: A conceptual framework. Government Information Quarterly, 30(2), 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Macintosh, A. (2004). Characterizing e-participation in policy-making. Paper presented at the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference the System Sciences, 2004.Google Scholar
  52. Mergel, I. (2012a). Social media in the public sector: A guide to participation, collaboration and transparency in the networked world. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  53. Mergel, I. (2012b). Measuring the impact of social media use in the public sector. Public Service, Governance and Web 2.0 Technologies: Future Trends in Social Media, 48.Google Scholar
  54. Mergel, I., & Desouza, K. C. (2013). Implementing open innovation in the public sector: The case of Challenge. gov. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 882–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Nam, T. (2012). Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via Government 2.0. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ndou, V. (2004). E-government for developing countries: Opportunities and challenges. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 18, 1–24.Google Scholar
  58. Nevo, S., & Wade, M. R. (2010). The formation and value of it-enabled resources: Antecedents and consequences. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 10.Google Scholar
  59. O’Flynn, J. (2007). From new public management to public value: Paradigmatic change and managerial implications. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(3), 353–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. O’Reilly, T. (2011). Government as a Platform. Innovations, 6(1), 13–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. OECD. (2014). The organisation for economic cooperation and development. Citizens as partners. Retrieved July 15, 2016, from
  62. Peristeras, V., Mentzas, G., Tarabanis, K. A., & Abecker, A. (2009). Transforming E-government and E-participation through IT. Intelligent Systems, IEEE, 24(5), 14–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creating unique value with customers. Strategy & Leadership, 32(3), 4–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rapoport, A. (1966). Mathematical aspects of general systems analysis. General Systems, 11(3), 1–28.Google Scholar
  65. Reddick, C. G. (2004). A two-stage model of e-government growth: Theories and empirical evidence for US cities. Government Information Quarterly, 21(1), 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rowley, J. (2011). e-Government stakeholders—Who are they and what do they want? International Journal of Information Management, 31(1), 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sahraoui, S. (2007). E-inclusion as a further stage of e-government?.Transforming. Government: People, Process and Policy, 1(1), 44–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2012). Are government internet portals evolving towards more interaction, participation, and collaboration? Revisiting the rhetoric of e-government among municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29, S72–S81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sarker, S., Sarker, S., Sahaym, A., & Bjørn-Andersen, N. (2012). Exploring value co-creation in relationships between an ERP vendor and its partners: A revelatory case study. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 317–338.Google Scholar
  70. Sarno, D. (2009). Twitter creator Jack Dorsey illuminates the site’s founding document. Part I. Los Angeles Times, 18.Google Scholar
  71. Scholl, H. J. (2008). Discipline or interdisciplinary study domain? Challenges and promises in electronic government research. In Digital government (pp. 21–41). Boston, MA: Springer.Google Scholar
  72. Sensis. (2016). Social media report 2016. How Australian people and businesses are using social media. Retrieved July 15, 2016, from
  73. Shao, G. (2009). Understanding the appeal of user-generated media: A uses and gratification perspective. Internet Research, 19(1), 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Statista. (2016). Statistics and facts about social networks. Retrieved July 15, 2016, from
  75. Stoker, G. (2006). Public value management a new narrative for networked governance? The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Thompson, F. J., & Riccucci, N. M. (1998). Reinventing government. Annual Review of Political Science, 1(1), 231–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. UK Cabinet Office. (2002). In the service of democracy – A consultation paper on a policy for electronic government.Google Scholar
  78. United Nations. (2003). World public sector report 2003: E-Government at the crossroads. Retrieved July 15, 2016, from
  79. Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2012). Adoption and impacts of interorganizational business process standards: Role of partnering synergy. Information Systems Research, 23(4), 1131–1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. West, D. M. (2004). E-Government and the Transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. White House. (2010). Open government initiative. Retrieved July 15, 2016, from
  82. World Bank. (2014). Strategic framework for mainstreaming citizen engagement in World Bank group operations. Retrieved July 15, 2016, from
  83. Yin, J., Lampert, A., Cameron, M., Robinson, B., & Power, R. (2012). Using social media to enhance emergency situation awareness. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 27(6), 52–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zimmerman, M. A., & Rappaport, J. (1988). Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16(5), 725–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammed Aladalah
    • 1
  • Yen Cheung
    • 1
  • Vicent C. S. Lee
    • 1
  • Sultan Alamri
    • 2
  1. 1.Monash UniversityClaytonAustralia
  2. 2.Saudi Electronic UniversityDammamSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations