Advertisement

Experiences of E-Government Development Implementation in Developing Countries: Challenges and Solutions

  • Laura Alcaide Muñoz
  • Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar
Chapter

Abstract

This book chapter analyses past experiences in the implementation of e-government in developing countries to learn lessons for improving its implementation in the future, which could help to achieve more transparent, participative and democratic societies. To achieve this aim, a systematic review on e-government research has been performed to examine the main limiting factors in e-government implementations. In this sense, we think that a systemic thinking approach is needed to be applied in developing countries to undertake successful e-government implementation. This means acting in three different scopes at the same time: (a) organizational structure and processes; (b) investment in IT infrastructure; and (c) investment in education to make citizens ready to use IT. These findings would help politicians and public managers in developing countries to make efficient decisions when implementing e-government initiatives.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was carried out with financial support from the Regional Government of Andalusia (Spain), Department of Innovation, Science and Enterprise (Research project number P11-SEJ-7700).

References

  1. Alcaide Muñoz, L., & Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. (2015). Understanding e-government research. A perspective from the information and library science field of knowledge. Internet Research, 25(4), 633–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alcaide Muñoz, L., Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P., & Garde Sánchez, R. (2014). Estudio cienciométrico de la investigación en trasparencia informativa, participación ciudadana y prestación de servicios públicos mediante la implementación del e-Gobierno. Revista de Contabilidad – Spanish Accounting Review, 17(2), 130–142.Google Scholar
  3. Andersen, T. B. (2009). E-government as an anti-corruption. Information Economics and Policy, 21(3), 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andersen, T. B., Bentzen, J. S., Dalgaard, C. J., & Selaya, P. (2011). Does the internet reduce corruption? Evidence from U.S. states and across countries. World Bank Economic Review, 25(3), 387–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arendsen, R., Peters, O., Ter Hedde, M., & Van Dijk, J. (2014). Does e-government reduce the administrative burden of businesses? An assessment of business-to-government systems usage in the Netherlands. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 160–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Atkin, D. J., Lau, T. Y., Aboulhoson, M., & Lin, C. (2008). Adoption of e-government in three Latin American countries: Argentina, Brazil and Mexico. Telecommunications Policy, 32, 88–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Axelsson, K., Melin, U., & Lindren, I. (2013). Public e-services for agency efficiency and citizen benefit – Findings from a stakeholder centered analysis. Government Information Quarterly, 30(1), 10–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Basu, S. (2004). E-government and developing countries: An overview. International Review of Law, Computer & Technology, 18(1), 109–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, D. H., & Thompson, S. (2011). Priorities, policies and practice of e-government in a development country context: ICT infrastructure and diffusion in Jamaica. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(3), 329–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caba Pérez, C., López Hernández, A. M., & Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. (2005). Citizens’ access to on-line governmental financial information: Practices in the European Union countries. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 258–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Calista, D. J., & Melitski, J. (2007). E-government and e-governance: Converging constructs of public sector information and communications technologies. Public Administration Quarterly, 31(1), 87–120.Google Scholar
  12. Callanan, M. (2005). Institutionalizing participation and governance? New participative structures in local government in Ireland. Public Administration, 83(4), 909–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chan, Y. L. (2004). Performance measurement and adoption of balanced scorecards. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 27(3), 204–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chan, H. S., & Chow, K. W. (2007). Public management policy and practice in western China: Metapolicy, tacit knowledge, and implications for management innovation transfer. American Review of Public Administration, 37(4), 479–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cheng, Y., Liang, J., & Leung, L. (2015). Social network service use on mobile devices: An examination of gratifications, civic attitudes and civic engagement in China. New Media and Society, 17(7), 1096–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Choi, H., Park, M. J., Rho, J. J., & Zo, H. (2016). Rethinking the assessment of e-government implementation in developing countries from the perspective of the design-reality gap: Applications in the Indonesia e-procurement system. Telecommunications Policy, 40(7), 644–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De’, R. (2006). Evaluation of e-government systems: Project assessment vs. development assessment. Electronic Government Proceedings, 4084, 317–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Estevez, E., & Janowski, T. (2013). Electronic governance for sustainable development – Conceptual framework and state of research. Government Information Quarterly, 30, S94–S109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Evans, D., & Yen, D. C. (2006). E-government: Evolving relationship of citizens and government, domestic, and international development. Government Information Quarterly, 23(2), 207–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gil-García, J. R., & Pardo, T. A. (2005). E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundation. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 187–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations: What different countries get for their research spending. Nature, 430(6997), 311–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kromidha, E. (2012). Strategic e-government development and the role of benchmarking. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 573–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee, L. C., Lin, P. H., Chuang, Y. W., & Lee, Y. Y. (2011). Research output and economic productivity: A ganger causality test. Scientometrics, 89(2), 465–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu, S. M., & Yuan, Q. (2015). The evolution of information and communication technology in public administration. Public Administration and Development, 35, 140–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Luna-Reyes, L. F., & Gil-García, J. R. (2011). Using institutional theory and dynamic simulation to understand complex e-government phenomena. Government Information Quarterly, 28(3), 329–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Navarra, D. (2010). The architecture of global ICT programs: A case study of e-governance in Jordan. Information Technology for Development, 16(2), 128–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. OECD. (2013). Global forum on transparency 2013. Global forum on transparency and exchange of information for tax purposes. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/tax/transparency
  28. Picazo-Vela, S., Gutiérrez-Martínez, I., & Luna-Reyes, L. F. (2012). Understanding risks, benefits, and strategic alternatives of social media applications in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 504–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reddick, C. G. (2011). Citizen interaction and e-government: Evidence for the managerial, consultative, and participatory models. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 5(2), 167–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reddick, C. G., Abdelsalam, H. M., & Elkadi, H. (2011). The influence of e-government on administrative discretion: The case of local governments in Egypt. Public Administration and Development, 31(5), 390–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P., Alcaide Muñoz, L., & López Hernández, A. M. (2016). Scientometric study of the progress and development of e-government research during the period 2000–2012. Information Technology for Development, 22(1), 36–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P., Caba Pérez, C., & López Hernández, A. M. (2006). Cultural contexts and governmental digital reporting. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 72(2), 269–290.Google Scholar
  33. Sá, F., Rocha, A., & Pérez Cota, M. (2016). From the quality of traditional services to the quality of local e-government online services: A literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schuppan, T. (2009). E-government in developing countries: Experiences from sub-Saharan Africa. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 118–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schwab, K., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (Eds.). (2015). The Global Competitiveness Report 2014–2015: Full Data Edition, published by the World Economic Forum within the framework of The Global Competitiveness and Benchmarking Network. World Economic Forum, 09/2015.Google Scholar
  36. Serenko, A., Bontis, N., Booker, L., Sadeddin, K., & Hardie, T. (2010). A Scientometric analysis of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic literature (1994–2008). Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(1), 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sharifi, M., & Manian, A. (2010). The study of the success indicators for pre-implementation activities of Iran’s e-government development projects. Government Information Quarterly, 27(1), 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Smith, M. L. (2010). Building institutional trust through e-government trustworthiness cues. Information Technology & People, 23(3), 222–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Susha, I., & Grönlund, A. (2014). Context clues for the stall of the citizens’ initiative: Lessons for opening up e-participation development practice. Government Information Quarterly, 31(3), 454–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. UN General Assembly. (2011). Programme of action for the least developed countries for the decade 2011–2020, Istanbul, May 2011. Retrieved from http://documents.wfp.org/stellent/groups/public/documents/eb/wfpdoc061607.pdf?_ga=1.164316415.1927046461.1488306887
  41. UNDESA, UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2016). United Nations e-government survey 2016: E-government in support of sustainable development. New York. ISBN 978-92-1-123205-9. Retrieved from https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/Portals/egovkb/Documents/un/2016-Survey/Executive%20Summary.pdf
  42. United Nations. (2002). The e-Government handbook for developing countries. Information for Development Program (infoDev). Retrieved from http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/APCITY/UNPAN007462.pdf
  43. United Nations. (2012). E-government survey 2012. E-government for the people. Retrieved from http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan048065.pdf
  44. Weerakkody, V., Dwivedi, Y. L., & Kurunananda, A. (2009). Implementing e-government in Sri Lanka: Lessons from the UK. Information Technology for Development, 15(3), 171–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhao, F., Collier, A., & Deng, H. (2014). A multidimensional and integrative approach to study global digital divide and e-government development. Information Technology and People, 27(1), 38–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhao, F., Scavarda, A. J., & Waxin, M. F. (2012). Key issues and challenges in e-government development. An integrative case study of the number one eCity in the Arab world. Information Technology for Development, 25(4), 395–422.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura Alcaide Muñoz
    • 1
  • Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar
    • 1
  1. 1.University of GranadaGranadaSpain

Personalised recommendations