Skip to main content

(Post)Humanist Tangles in Social Ecology and New Materialism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Ecopoetics of Entanglement in Contemporary Turkish and American Literatures

Part of the book series: Literatures, Cultures, and the Environment ((LCE))

  • 385 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter argues that entanglements lie at the core of two prominent schools of ecological thought: social ecology and new materialism. While social ecology, spearheaded by Murray Bookchin, stresses the tangle of ecological and socio-political issues and advocates for a transformative viewpoint in both spheres, new materialism destabilizes the nature/culture dichotomy by reading the production of matter and meaning as co-extensive praxes and by defining phenomena, in Karen Barad’s terms, as the “ontological inseparability of intra-acting agencies.” Ergin reads social ecology and new materialism, respectively, in relation to deconstruction to tease out the different models of entanglement in each school of thought and to elucidate what is at stake in the motif of entanglement. She rethinks these three strands of thought vis-à-vis each other to capture some of the breadth and variety in reconceptualizations of natural-social and material-discursive entanglements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “Ecology and Revolutionary Thought” was initially published in the journal New Directions in Libertarian Thought in 1964. Bookchin referred to this essay when advancing his ideas on social ecology in his first public statement in 1965. “Ecology and Revolutionary Thought” was later published, together with his major essays from the sixties, in the collection titled Post-Scarcity Anarchism. From here on, I refer to the 1986 publication of this collection by Black Rose Books.

References

  • Alaimo, Stacy. 2010. Bodily Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Quantum Entanglements and Hauntological Relations of Inheritance: Dis/continuities‚ SpaceTime Enfoldings‚ and Justice-to-Come. Derrida Today‚ special issue Deconstruction and Science 3 (2): 240–268. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/drt.2010.0206.

  • ———. 2012a. Interview by Rick Dolphijn and Iris van der Tuin. “Matter Feels, Converses, Suffers, Desires, Yearns and Remembers.” In New Materialism: Interviews & Cartographies, ed. Rick Dolphijn and Iris van der Tuin, 48–70. Ann Arbor, MI: Open Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012b. On Touching—The Inhuman That Therefore I Am. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 23 (3): 206–223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/10407391-1892943.

  • Bennett, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biehl, Janet. 1993. Dialectics in the Ethics of Social Ecology. In Environmental Philosophy: From Animal Rights to Radical Ecology, ed. Michael E. Zimmerman, 374–389. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. Introduction. In The Murray Bookchin Reader, ed. Janet Biehl, 1–12. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookchin, Murray. 1962. Our Synthetic Environment. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1964. Ecology and Revolutionary Thought. New Directions in Libertarian Thought. September.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1986. Ecology and Revolutionary Thought. In Post-Scarcity Anarchism, 77–104. Montreal: Black Rose Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1990a. Remaking Society. Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1990b. The Philosophy of Social Ecology. Montreal: Black Rose Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. What is Social Ecology? In Environmental Philosophy: From Animal Rights to Radical Ecology, ed. Michael E. Zimmerman, 354–373. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. Toward an Ecological Society. Montreal: Black Rose Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997a. A Philosophical Naturalism. In The Murray Bookchin Reader, ed. Janet Biehl, 203–218. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997b. Ecologizing the Dialectic. In The Murray Bookchin Reader, ed. Janet Biehl, 218–224. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997c. Images of First Nature. In The Murray Bookchin Reader, ed. Janet Biehl, 39–43. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997d. Objectively Grounded Ethics. In The Murray Bookchin Reader, ed. Janet Biehl, 199–203. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookchin, Murray, and Dave Foreman. 1991. Defending the Earth: A Debate Between Murray Bookchin and Dave Foreman. Montreal: Black Rose Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, Rosi. 2000. Teratologies. In Deleuze and Feminist Theory, ed. Ian Buchanan and Claire Colebrook, 156–172. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Transpositions: On Nomadic Ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, Rachel. 1962. Silent Spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, John. 1993. Introduction. In Environmental Philosophy: From Animal Rights to Radical Ecology, ed. Michael E. Zimmerman, 345–353. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coole, Diane, and Samantha Frost. 2010. Introducing the New Materialisms. In New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics, ed. Diane Coole and Samantha Frost, 1–46. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Culler, Jonathan. 1983. On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism After Structuralism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 1974. Of Grammatology, trans. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1981. Positions, trans. Alan Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1985. The Ear of the Other: Otobiography, Transference, Translation, trans. Peggy and ed. Christie McDonald. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. ‘Eating Well’, or the Calculation of the Subject: An Interview with Jacques Derrida. In Who Comes After the Subject? ed. Eduardo Cadava, Peter Connor, and Jean-Luc Nancy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. Aporias, trans. Thomas Dutoit. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International, trans. Peggy Kamuf. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. Monolingualism of the Other; or, The Prosthesis of Origin, trans. Patrick Mensah. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. On TouchingJean-Luc Nancy, trans. Christine Irizarry. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques, and Maurizio Ferraris. 2001. A Taste for the Secret, trans. Giacomo Donis. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolphijn‚ Rick‚ and Iris van der Tuin. 2012. New Materialism: Interviews and Cartographies. Ann Arbor‚ MI: Open Humanities Press. http://openhumanitiespress.org/books/download/Dolphijn-van-der-Tuin_2013_New-Materialism.pdf.

  • Haraway, Donna J. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iovino, Serenella, and Serpil Oppermann. 2014. Introduction: Stories Come to Matter. In Material Ecocriticism, ed. Serenella Iovino and Serpil Oppermann, 1–17. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, Vicky. 1997. Telling Flesh: The Substance of the Corporeal. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern, trans. Catherine Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. On Actor-Network Theory: A Few Clarifications. Soziale Welt 47 (4): 369–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebduska, Lisa. 2003. How Green was My Advertising: American Ecoconsumerism. In The ISLE Reader: Ecocriticism, 1993–2003, ed. Michael P. Branch and Scott Slovic, 143–154. Athens: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, Richard, and Richard Levins. 2007. Biology Under the Influence: Dialectical Essays on Ecology, Agriculture, and Health. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naess, Arne. 1993. “Simple in Means, Rich in Ends.” Interview by Stephan Bodian. In Environmental Philosophy: From Animal Rights to Radical Ecology, ed. Michael E. Zimmerman, 182–192. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nancy, Jean-Luc. 2000. Being Singular Plural, trans. Robert D. Richardson and Anne E. O’Byrne. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppermann, Serpil. 2014. From Ecological Postmodernism to Material Ecocriticism: Creative Materiality and Narrative Agency. In Material Ecocriticism, ed. Serenella Iovino and Serpil Oppermann, 21–36. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wyck‚ Peter C. 1997. Primitives in the Wilderness: Deep Ecology and the Missing Human Subject. Albany‚ NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, Michael E. 1994. Contesting Earth’s Future: Radical Ecology and Postmodernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meliz Ergin .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ergin, M. (2017). (Post)Humanist Tangles in Social Ecology and New Materialism. In: The Ecopoetics of Entanglement in Contemporary Turkish and American Literatures. Literatures, Cultures, and the Environment. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63263-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics