Advertisement

Becoming a Working-Class Male Adult Learner: Formations of Class and Gender in the Finnish Learning Society

  • Toni Kosonen
Chapter
Part of the Global Masculinities book series (GLMAS)

Abstract

This chapter focuses on how class and gender inform Finnish working-class men's relationships with vocational adult education and learning. Current discourses in adult education problematize working-class masculinities and portray working-class men as individuals who fail to meet the currently hegemonic societal expectations in failing to appreciate and engage in ‘lifelong learning’. The study considers how men respond to these normative expectations from their gendered and classed social positions. The data come from interviews with 32 Finnish men from working-class backgrounds who have recently participated in vocational adult education. The results bring forward three cultural forms of being a working-class man that are related to attempts to conform to, disregard and challenge societal expectations prevailing in a late modern Nordic learning society.

References

  1. Archer, L. (2001). Working-class men’s constructions of masculinity and negotiations of (non)participation in higher education. Gender and Education, 13(4), 431–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  3. Bowl, M. (2012). Implication for practice, research and policy. In M. Bowl, R. Tobias, J. Leahy, G. Ferguson, & J. Gage (Eds.), Gender, masculinities and lifelong learning (pp. 161–174). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Bowl, M., Tobias, R., Leahy, J., Ferguson, G., & Gage, J. (Eds.). (2012). Gender, masculinities and lifelong learning. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Brunila, K., Hakala, K., Lahelma, E., & Teittinen, A. (Eds.). (2013). Ammatillinen koulutus ja yhteiskunnalliset eronteot [Vocational education and social distinctions]. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.Google Scholar
  6. Burke, P. J. (2006). Men accessing education: Gendered aspirations. British Educational Research Journal, 32(5), 719–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Connell, R. (2012). Gender, health and theory: Conceptualizing the issue, in local and world perspective. Social Science & Medicine, 74(11), 1675–1683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. Connell, R. W. (2002). Gender. Cambridge: Polity Press; Malden: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender and Society, 19(6), 829–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Devine, F., & Savage, M. (2005). The cultural turn, sociology and class analysis. In F. Devine, M. Savage, J. Scott, & R. Crompton (Eds.), Rethinking class. Culture, identities and lifestyles (pp. 1–23). Hampshire/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Epstein, D., Elwood, J., Hey, V., & Maw, J. (1998). Failing boys? Issues in gender and achievement. Buckingham/Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Illeris, K. (2006). Lifelong learning and the low-skilled. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 25(1), 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Isopahkala-Bouret, U., Lappalainen, S., & Lahelma, E. (2014). Educating worker-citizens: Visions and divisions in curriculum texts. Journal of Education and Work, 27(1), 92–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jauhiainen, A., & Alho-Malmelin, M. (2004). Education as a religion in the learning society. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 23(5), 459–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Julkunen, R. (2012). Mieskysymys suomalaisen tasa-arvopolitiikan asialistalla [The man question on the gender equality policy agenda]. In A. Jokinen (Ed.), Mieskysymys. Miesliike, −työ, −tutkimus ja tasa-arvopolitiikka (pp. 30–43). Tampere: Tampere University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Käyhkö, M. (2015). Working-class girls in a foreign land. Social class and settling into university in a cross-current between two cultures. Gender and Education, 27(4), 445–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kilpi-Jakonen, E., Sirviö, O., & Martikainen, P. (2014). Adult learners in Finland: Formal adult education as an opportunity for reducing inequality? In H.-P. Blossfeld, E. Kilpi-Jakonen, D. Vono de Vilhena, & S. Buchholz (Eds.), Adult learning in modern societies: Patterns and consequences of participation from a life-course perspective (pp. 204–222). Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  19. Koski, L., & Filander, K. (2013). Transforming causal logics in Finnish adult education: Historical and moral transitions rewritten. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 32(5), 583–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kosonen, T. (2016). Opiskeleva ammattimies, yhteiskuntaluokka ja sukupuoli. Tutkimus ammatilliseen aikuiskoulutukseen osallistuvista työläismiehistä. [The studying working man, social class and gender. A study of working-class men participating in vocational adult training]. Joensuu: Itä-Suomen yliopisto.Google Scholar
  21. Lamont, M. (2000). The dignity of working men. Morality and the boundaries of race, class, and immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Manninen, S., Huuki, T., & Sunnari, V. (2011). ‘Earn yo’ respect!’ Respect in the status struggle of Finnish school boys. Men and Masculinities, 14(3), 335–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Markkola, P., Östman, A.-C., & Lamberg, M. (Eds.). (2014). Näkymätön sukupuoli. Mieheyden pitkä historia. [Invisible gender. The long history of manhood]. Tampere: Vastapaino.Google Scholar
  24. McNay, L. (2004). Agency and experience: Gender as a lived relation. In L. Adkins & B. Skeggs (Eds.), Feminism after Bourdieu (pp. 175–190). Oxford/Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Messner, M. (2000). Politics of masculinities. Men in movements. Lanham/Oxford: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  26. Ministry of Education and Culture. (2010). Noste Programme 2003–2009. Final report (Reports of the Ministry of Education and Culture, Finland 2010:8). Helsinki: Helsinki University Print.Google Scholar
  27. Nicoll, K., & Fejes, A. (2008). Mobilizing Foucault in studies of lifelong learning. In A. Fejes & K. Nicoll (Eds.), Foucault and lifelong learning: Governing the subject (pp. 1–18). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. O’Rourke, R. (2012). Men in United Kingdom adult and community education: The politics of practice and pedagogy. In M. Bowl, R. Tobias, J. Leahy, G. Ferguson, & J. Gage (Eds.), Gender, masculinities and lifelong learning (pp. 82–94). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Official Statistics of Finland. (2009). Adult education survey [e-publication]: European comparison 2006. Statistics Finland, Helsinki. http://www.stat.fi/til/aku/2006/04/aku_2006_04_2009-04-24_tie_001_en.html. Accessed 25 Oct 2015.
  30. Official Statistics of Finland. (2013). Aikuiskoulutustutkimus [Participation in adult education, e-publication]. Aikuiskoulutukseen osallistuminen 2012, 1. Aikuisopiskelijoiden määrä yli 1,7 miljoonaa. Tilastokeskus, Helsinki. http://www.stat.fi/til/aku/2012/01/aku_2012_01_2013-06-13_kat_001_fi.html. Accessed 25 Oct 2015.
  31. Pini, B. (2005). Interviewing men. Gender and the collection and interpretation of qualitative data. Journal of Sociology, 41(2), 201–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pini, B., & Pease, B. (Eds.). (2013). Men, masculinities and methodologies. Hampshire/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  33. Reay, D. (2002). Class, authenticity and the transition to higher education for mature students. The Sociological Review, 50(3), 398–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Roberts, S. (2013). Gaining skills or just paying the bills? Workplace learning in low-level retail employment. Journal of Education and Work, 26(3), 267–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Roberts, S. (2014). Introduction: Masculinities in crisis? Opening the debate. In S. Roberts (Ed.), Debating modern masculinities. Change, continuity, crisis? (pp. 1–16). Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  36. Schwalbe, M., & Volkomir, M. (2001). The masculine self as problem and resource in interview studies of men. Men and Masculinities, 4(1), 90–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Simons, M., & Masschelein, J. (2008). Our ‘will to learn’ and the assemblage of a learning apparatus. In A. Fejes & K. Nicoll (Eds.), Foucault and lifelong learning. Governing the subject (pp. 48–60). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Skeggs, B. (1997). Formations of class and gender. Becoming respectable. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  39. Skeggs, B. (2004). Class, self, culture. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Tolonen, T. (Ed.). (2008). Yhteiskuntaluokka ja sukupuoli [Social class and gender]. Tampere: Vastapaino.Google Scholar
  41. Turtiainen, J., & Väänänen, A. (2012). Men of steel? The masculinity of metal industry workers in Finland after World War II. Journal of Social History, 46(2), 449–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labor: How working-class kids get working-class jobs. New York: University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Toni Kosonen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Social SciencesUniversity of Eastern FinlandJoensuuFinland

Personalised recommendations