Working-Class Masculinities at the Nexus of Work, Family and Intimacy in the Age of Neoliberalism: Or, Are the Times Really A-Changin’?

  • Kirsty Whitman
Part of the Global Masculinities book series (GLMAS)


This chapter investigates the often unexplored area of families and intimacy as they relate to the performance of working-class masculinity in Australia. Relying on research conducted in the aftermath of the Global Financial Crisis, it will illustrate how traditional gendered notions still abound in relation to work and labour. However, new, more transgressive ways of doing parenting and partnership are becoming more prevalent in the private sphere. I shall consider intimacy, fathering and the ‘family’ as sites where class and gender intersect in unique ways. In particular, I want to explore whether various conditions that are aligned with being working class in fact create spaces within the working- class family for the challenging of gendered social ‘norms’, and whether these spaces and conditions offer new ways of ‘doing gender’ that challenge the hegemony of neoliberal discourses.


  1. Aaltonen, S., & Karvonen, S. (2016). Floating downstream? Parental support and future expectations of young people from less privileged backgrounds. Sociology, 50(4), 714–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beasley, C. (2008). Rethinking hegemonic masculinity in a globalizing world. Men and Masculinities, 11(1), 86–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beasley, C. (2009). Male bodies at the edge of the world: Re-thinking hegemonic and ‘other’ masculinities in Australian cinema. In S. Fouz-Hernández (Ed.), Mysterious skin: Male bodies in contemporary cinema. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  4. Beasley, C. (2011). Libidinous politics. Australian Feminist Studies, 26(67), 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brady, M., Stevens, E., Coles, L., Zadoroznyj, M., & Martin, B. (2017). ‘You can spend time … but not necessarily be bonding with them’: Australian fathers’ constructions and enactments of infant bonding. Journal of Social Policy, 46(1), 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brady, M., & Perales, F. (2016). Hours of paid work among single and partnered mothers in Australia. Journal of Family Issues, 37(3), 321–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cahill, D. (2008). Hegemony and the neo-liberal historic bloc: The Australian experience. In R. Howson & K. Smith (Eds.), Hegemony: Studies in consensus and coercion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Cha, Y., & Thébaud, S. (2009). Labor markets, breadwinning, and beliefs. Gender & Society, 23(2), 215–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Connell, R. W. (1995, 2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). Allen & Unwin, Crows Nest.Google Scholar
  11. Donaldson, M. (1991). Time of our lives: Labour and love in the working class. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  12. Demetriou, Z. D. (2001). Theory and Society 30(3), 337–361.Google Scholar
  13. Deutsch, F. M. (2007). Undoing gender. Gender & Society, 21(1), 106–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elder, C. (2007). Being Australian: Narratives of national identity. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  15. Elliot, H., Parsons, S., Brannen, J., Elliot, J., & Phoenix, A. (2017). Narratives of fathering young children in Britain: Linking quantitative and qualitative analyses. Community, Work and Family. doi: 10.1080/13668803.2016.1241758.
  16. Gillies, V. (2005a). Meeting parents’ needs? Discourses of ‘support’ and ‘inclusion’ in family policy. Critical Social Policy, 25(1), 70–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gillies, V. (2005b). Raising the ‘meritocracy’: Parenting and the individualization of social class. Sociology, 39(5), 835–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gomm, R. (2004). Social research methodology: A critical introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Gramsci, A. (1971). In Q. Hoare & G. Howell Smith (Eds.), Selections from the prison notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
  20. Habel, C., Whitman, K., & Stokes, J. (2016). Exploring the experience of low-SES students via enabling pathways. Report. National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education, Monash University.Google Scholar
  21. Hearn, J. (2004). From hegemonic masculinity the hegemony of men. Feminist Theory, 5(1), 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Howson, R. (2006). Challenging hegemonic masculinity. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Hughes, K. (2012). Micro-histories and things that matter. Australian Feminist Studies, 27(73), 269–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hunter, S., Riggs, D., & Augoustinos, M. (2017). Hegemonic masculinity versus a caring masculinity: Implications for understanding primary caregiving fathers. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11, 1–9. Scholar
  25. Jamieson, L. (1999). Intimacy transformed? A critical look at the “pure relationship”. Sociology, 33(3), 477–494.Google Scholar
  26. Johnson, P., & Lawler, S. (2005). Coming home to love and class. Sociological Research Online, 10(3).
  27. Kenny. (2006). Directed by Clayton Jacobson. Thunderbox Films, Australia.Google Scholar
  28. Lawler, S. (2002). Mobs and monsters: Independent man meets Paulsgrove woman. Feminist Theory, 3(1), 103–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Legerski, E. M., & Cornwall, M. (2010). Working-class job loss, gender, and the negotiation of household labour. Gender and Society, 24(4), 447–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liong, M. (2015). Sacrifice for the family: Representation and practice of stay-at-home fathers in the intersection of masculinity and class in Hong Kong. Journal of Gender Studies. doi: 10.1080/09589236.2015.11112000.
  31. Loveday, V. (2016). Embodying deficiency through ‘affective practice’: Shame, relationality, and the lived experience of social class and gender in higher education. Sociology, 50(6), 1140–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lyonette, C., & Crompton, R. (2015). Sharing the load? Partners’ relative earnings and the domestic division of labour. Work, Employment and Society, 29(1), 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mauthner, N. S., & Doucet, A. (2003). Reflexive accounts and accounts of reflexivity in qualitative data analysis. Sociology, 37(3), 413–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Morris, L. (2016). The moral economy of austerity: Analysing UK welfare reform. The British Journal of Sociology, 67(1), 97–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Muir, K. (2008). Worth fighting for: Inside the your rights at work campaign. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.Google Scholar
  36. Murrie, L. (1998). The Australian legend: Writing Australian masculinity/writing ‘Australian’ masculine. Journal of Australian Studies, 22(56), 68–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nixon, D. (2009). I can’t put a smiley face on: Working-class masculinity, emotional labour and service work in the “new economy”. Gender, Work and Organization, 16(3), 300–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Peetz, D. (2006). Brave new workplace: How individual contracts are changing our jobs. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  39. Pini, B., & Mayes, R. (2012). Gender, emotions and fly-in fly-out work. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 47(1), 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pocock, B. (2003). The work/life collision. Sydney: The Federation Press.Google Scholar
  41. Pocock, B. (2005). Work/care regimes: Institutions, culture and behaviour and the Australian case. Gender, Work and Organization, 12(1), 32–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pocock, B., van Wanrooy, B., Strazzari, S., & Bridge, K. (2001). Fifty families: What unreasonable hours do to Australians, their families and their communities. Report for the Australian Council of Trade Unions.Google Scholar
  43. Reay, D. (2001). Finding or losing yourself?: Working-class relationships to education. Journal of Education Policy, 16(4), 333–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Roberts, S. (2013). Boys will be boys … won’t they? Change and continuities in contemporary young working-class masculinities. Sociology, 47(4), 671–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shows, C., & Gerstel, N. (2009). Fathering, class, and gender: A comparison of physicians and emergency medical technicians. Gender & Society, 23(2), 161–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Skeggs, B. (2003). Class, self, culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Stahl, G. (2016a). White working-class male narratives of ‘loyalty to self’ in discourses of aspiration. British Journal of Sociology in Education, 37(5), 663–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stahl, G. (2016b). Relationship-building in research: Gendered identity construction in researcher-participant relationships. Studies in Qualitative Methodology, 14, 145–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wall, G., & Arnold, S. (2007). How involved is involved fathering? Gender and Society, 21(4), 508–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Weis, L. (1990). Working-class without work: High school students in a de-industrializing economy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Weis, L. (2004). Class reunion: The remaking of the American white working class. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Weis, L. (2008). Toward a re-thinking of class as nested in race and gender: Tracking the white working class in the final quarter of the twentieth century. In L. Weis (Ed.), The way class works: Readings on school, family and the economy (pp. 291–304). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Western, M., Baxter, J., Pakulski, J., Tranter, B., Western, J., van Egmond, M., Chesters, J., Hosking, A., O’Flaherty, M., & van Gellecum, Y. (2007). Neoliberalism, inequality and politics: The changing face of Australia. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 42, 401–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Whitehead, S. M. (2004). Men and masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  55. Whitman, K. (2013). The ‘Aussie Battler’ and the hegemony of centralizing working-class masculinity in Australia: Gender, class mainstreaming and the axis of visibility in Kenny. Australian Feminist Studies, 28(75), 50–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Whitman, K. (2014). Looking out for the ‘Aussie Bloke’: Gender, class and contextualizing a hegemony of working-class masculinities in Australia. PhD thesis submitted June 2013, University of Adelaide.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kirsty Whitman
    • 1
  1. 1.University of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations