Advertisement

The Limits of Securing and Marketizing Natural Resources and a Way Forward

  • Michael D. Beevers
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, Beevers compares decade-long efforts to address natural resources after the armed conflicts in Liberia and Sierra Leone. It shows that international peacebuilders in both countries pursued a strategy to transform “conflict resources” into “peace resources” vis-à-vis a policy agenda that emphasized securitization and marketization. Beevers argues that while the worst of the resource plunder is over, a skewed approach to natural resource governance has recreated the conditions that historically created contention and violence around resources and runs the risk of exacerbating tensions. The chapter draws attention to the ways in which narratives about the links between natural resources, armed conflict and peace framed the policy agenda and brought to the forefront certain interventions but ignored others. The chapter concludes with practical recommendations for strengthening natural resources governance for peace that goes beyond Liberia and Sierra Leone.

References

  1. Autesserre, Séverine. 2010. The Trouble with Congo: Local Violence and the Failure of International Peacebuilding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ———. 2012. Dangerous Tales: Dominant Narratives on the Congo and Their Unintended Consequences. African Affairs 111 (443): 202–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ———. 2014. Peaceland: Conflict Resolution and the Everyday Politics of International Intervention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bannon, Ian, and Paul Collier, eds. 2003. Natural Resources and Violent Conflict. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  5. Barnett, Michael, and Martha Finnemore. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Beevers, Michael D. 2015. Peace Resources? Governing Liberia’s Forests in the Aftermath of Conflict. International Peacekeeping 22 (1): 26–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brima, Abu. 2003. Making Human Rights Work in a Globalizing World. Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs.Google Scholar
  8. CNN (Cable News Network). 2000. Lust for Diamonds Kills Thousands in African Wars, January 12.Google Scholar
  9. Collier, Paul. 2007. The Bottom Billion: Why the Poorest Countries Are Failing and What Can Be Done About It. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Collier, Paul, and Anthony J. Venables. 2011. Plundered Nations? Successes and Failure in Natural Resource Extraction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Conca, Ken. 2006. Governing Water: Contentious Transnational Politics and Global Institution Building. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2015. An Unfinished Foundation: The United Nations and Global Environmental Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Conca, Ken, and Geoffrey Dabelko. 2002. Environmental Peacemaking. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar
  14. Conca, Ken, and Jennifer Wallace. 2009. Environment and Peacebuilding in War-Torn Societies: Lessons from UN Environment Programme’s Experience with Postconflict Assessment. Global Governance 15 (4): 485–504.Google Scholar
  15. Conca, Ken, and Michael D. Beevers. 2018. Environmental Pathways to Peace. In Routledge Handbook of Environmental Conflict and Peacebuilding, ed. Ashok Swain and Joakim Ojendal, 54–72. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Fofana, Lansana. 2009. Mining Bill Queried. IPS News, December 23.Google Scholar
  17. Global Witness. 2010. Lessons Unlearned: How the UN and Member States Must Do More to End Natural Resource-Fuelled Conflicts. London: Global Witness.Google Scholar
  18. GOL (Government of Liberia). 2014. Land Rights Policy, July 3.Google Scholar
  19. Hamm, Brigitte I. 2001. A Human Rights Approach to Development. Human Rights Quarterly 23 (4): 1005–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Human Rights Watch. 2014. Whose Development? Human Rights Abuses in Sierra Leone’s Mining Boom. Washington, DC: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
  21. IMF (International Monetary Fund). 2005. Sierra Leone: Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
  22. Keen, David. 2005. Conflict and Collusion in Sierra Leone. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  23. Keck Margaret, E., and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Kindornay, Shannon, James Ron, and Charli Carpenter. 2012. Rights-Based Approaches to Development: Implications for NGOs. Human Rights Quarterly 34 (2): 472–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Larson, Anne M., and Fernanda Soto. 2008. Decentralization of Natural Resource Governance Regimes. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 33: 213–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. LRCFP (Land Rights and Community Forestry Program). 2011. Final Evaluation of the Land Rights and Community Forestry Program. Washington, DC: USAID.Google Scholar
  27. Lynch, Cecilia. 2013. Neoliberal Ethics, the Humanitarian International, and Practices of Peacebuilding. In Globalization, Social Movements, and Peacebuilding, ed. Jackie Smith and Ernesto Verdeja, 47–68. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Maconachie, Roy. 2012. Diamond Mining, Urbanization and Social Transformation in Sierra Leone. Journal of Contemporary African Studies 30 (4): 705–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Manson, Katrina. 2012. Sierra Leone’s War Trauma Gives Way to Resource Bonanza. Financial Times, July 13.Google Scholar
  30. Martin, Adrian. 2005. Environmental Conflict Between Refugee and Host Communities. Journal of Peace Research 42 (3): 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mining Working Group of the UN. 2014. A Rights-Based Approach to Resource Extraction in Pursuit of Sustainable Development. Advocacy: Brief.Google Scholar
  32. Nelson, Paul J., and Ellen Dorsey. 2008. New Rights Advocacy: Changing Strategies of Development and Human Rights NGOs. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  33. NGO Open Letter. 2006. Open Letter: NGO Statement on the Enactment of Liberia’s New National Forestry Reform Law – What’s Left for Communities? September 25.Google Scholar
  34. Paris, Roland. 2003. Peacekeeping and the Constraints of Global Culture. European Journal of International Relations 9 (3): 441–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. ———. 2004. At War’s End: Building Peace After Civil Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Parlevliet, Michelle. 2002. Bridging the Divide: Exploring the Relationship between Human Rights and Conflict Management. Track Two: Constructive Approaches to Community and Political Conflict 11 (1): 1–29.Google Scholar
  37. Peluso, Nancy Lee, and Michael Watts. 2001. Violent Environments. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Persha, Lauren, Arun Agrawal, and Ashwini Chhatre. 2011. Social and Ecological Synergy: Local Rulemaking, Forest Livelihoods, and Biodiversity Conservation. Science 311 (6024): 1606–1608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Richards, Paul, et al. 2005. Community Cohesion in Liberia: A Post-War Rapid Social Assessment. Conflict Prevention and Reconstruction, Social Development Papers. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  40. Rustad, Siri Aas, Päivi Lujala, and Philippe Le Billon. 2012. Building or Spoiling Peace? Lessons from the Management of High-Value Natural Resources. In High-Value Natural Resources and Post-Conflict Peacebuilding, ed. Päivi Lujala and Siri Aas Rustad, 571–621. New York: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  41. Shearman, Phil L. 2009. An Assessment of Liberian Forest Area, Dynamics, FDA Concession Plans, and Their Relevance to Revenue Projections. Washington, DC: Rights and Resources.Google Scholar
  42. Skoog, Olof. 2017. Security Council Briefing on Liberia, June 27.Google Scholar
  43. UN (United Nations). 2003. UN Common Understanding on the Human Rights Based Approach to Development Cooperation. Inter-Agency Workshop on Human Rights Based Approach in the Context of UN Reforms, May 3–5.Google Scholar
  44. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). 2004. Desk Study on the Environment in Liberia. Nairobi: UNEP.Google Scholar
  45. ———. 2009. From Conflict to Peacebuilding: The Role of Natural Resources and the Environment. Nairobi: UNEP.Google Scholar
  46. ———. 2010. Sierra Leone: Environment, Conflict and Peacebuilding Assessment. Geneva: UNEP.Google Scholar
  47. UNDPA and UNEP (United Nations Department of Political Affairs and United Nations Environment Programme). 2015. Natural Resources and Conflict: A Guide for Mediation Practitioners. Nairobi and New York: UNEP and UNDPA.Google Scholar
  48. Uvin, Peter. 2007. From the Right to Development to the Rights-Based Approach: How ‘Human Rights’ Entered Development. Development in Practice 17 (4): 597–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vandenhole, Wouter, and Paul Gready. 2014. Failures and Successes of Human Rights-Based Approaches to Development: Towards a Change Perspective. Nordic Journal of Human Rights 32 (4): 291–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wallace, Jennifer, and Ken Conca. 2012. Peace Through Sustainable Forest Management in Asia: The USAID Forest Conflict Initiative. In High-Value Natural Resources and Post-Conflict Peacebuilding, ed. Päivi Lujala and Siri Aas Rustad, 503–528. New York: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  51. Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy/Center for International Earth Science Information Network at Columbia University. 2014. Environmental Performance Index.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael D. Beevers
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental StudiesDickinson CollegeCarlisleUSA

Personalised recommendations