Advertisement

The Role of Systems Thinking in the Practice of Implementing Sustainable Development Goals

  • Martin ReynoldsEmail author
  • Christine Blackmore
  • Ray Ison
  • Rupesh Shah
  • Elaine Wedlock
Chapter
Part of the World Sustainability Series book series (WSUSE)

Abstract

Implementing the sustainable development goals (SDGs) adopted at the UN Summit in September 2015 specifically invites the creation of “an integrated, holistic, multi-stakeholder approach”. This implies the need for systems thinking in practice, a tradition that draws on systems theories, tools and techniques able to facilitate better conversation and cooperation between agencies. As an approach it goes beyond development of competencies through formal education programmes. This paper focuses on SDG 17—the means of implementation—and the role of systems thinking in practice for supporting both competence and SDG implementation capability. Two inter-linked initiatives led by systems thinking practitioners in the field of sustainability science are reported; one is an action research inquiry exploring the praxis (theory-informed-action) challenges of applying systems thinking in practice in contemporary workplaces ranging from in-field development projects to government administrations and business ventures, and another which built on the findings from this inquiry—a proposal for developing an action-learning platform for SDG implementation. Experience suggests that implementing SDGs requires not only competence in systems thinking but a capability of putting systems thinking into practice in a dynamic way, as praxis. The proposed action-learning platform can also be regarded as a learning laboratory in the sense that it will offer learning support and a chance to collaborate and experiment. This platform aims to be co-designed with multi-agency practitioners from international development, government planning, business/social enterprise and NGOs. The proposed platform draws on open-source resources, and ideas of social learning, developmental evaluation and systems thinking in practice traditions.

Keywords

Competency framework Capability approach Developmental evaluation Integration Learning laboratory Praxis Sustainable development goals Systemic sensibility Systems thinking Systems thinking in practice 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Appreciation is given to copyright owner The Open University (UK) for permission to reproduce Figs. 2, 3 and 6

The action research inquiry—Enhancing Systems Thinking in Practice at the Workplace—was funded by eSTEeM—The Open University Centre for promoting STEM (science, technology, engineering, and maths) Pedagogy. eSTEeM is continuing to fund the development of a competency framework arising from this inquiry.

Appreciation is extended to academic practitioners Seanna Davidson, Ray Ison, and Phil Wallis, on the Systemic Governance Research Program (SGRP) at the Monash Sustainability Institute (Monash University, Australia) for their permission to use material including Fig. 4 in this manuscript, from their original concept note Proposal to create aLearning Laboratory’ (Ison et al. 2016).

The learning laboratory initiative—Facilitating effective implementation of Global Goals for Sustainable Development through Applied Systems Thinking—has involved active collaboration with the following colleagues to whom I’m indebted: Valérie Amato (Independent Consultant), Richard Pinder (OU Qualifications Director, Development Policy and Practice), and Ellen Scott (OU Senior Project Manager, International Development Office).

References

  1. Abson, D. J., Fischer, J., Leventon, J., Newig, J., Schomerus, T., Vilsmaier, U., et al. (2017). Leverage points for sustainability transformation. Ambio, 46(1), 30–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barth, M., Michelsen, G., Rieckmann, M., & Thomas, I. (Eds.). (2016). Routledge handbook of higher education for sustainable development. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Berardi, A., Mistry, J., Tschirhart, C., Bignante, E., Davis, O., Haynes, L., et al. (2015). Applying the system viability framework for cross-scalar governance of nested social-ecological systems in the Guiana Shield, South America. Ecology and Society, 20(3). Google Scholar
  4. Blackmore, C. (2010). Social learning systems and communities of practice (pp. 44–50). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blackmore, C., & Ison, R. (1995) Learning how to use a systems approach for sustainability. In The greening of higher education conference (Vol. 6).Google Scholar
  6. Blackmore, C., Ison, R., & Reynolds, M. (2014). Thinking differently about sustainability: Experiences from the UK Open University. In W. Leal Filho, U. Azeiteiro, F. Alves, & S. Caeiro (Eds.), Integrating sustainability thinking in science and engineering curricula (pp. 613–630), World Sustainability Series Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Blackmore, C., Reynolds, M., Ison, R., & Lane, A. (2015). Embedding sustainability through systems thinking in practice: Some experiences from the Open University. In L. Wyness (Ed.), Education for sustainable development pedagogy: Criticality, creativity, and collaboration (pp. 32–35). PedRIO occasional papers (8). Pedagogic Research Institute and Observatory (PedRIO), Plymouth University.Google Scholar
  8. Cook, S. N., & Wagenaar, H. (2012). Navigating the eternally unfolding present toward an epistemology of practice. The American Review of Public Administration, 42(1), 3–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Disterheft, A., Caeiro, S., Azeiteiro, U. M., & Leal Filho, W. (2013). Sustainability science and education for sustainable development in universities: A way for transition. In Sustainability assessment tools in higher education institutions (pp. 3–27). London: Springer. Google Scholar
  10. Foster, N., Collins, K., Ison, R., & Blackmore, C. (2016). Water governance in England: Improving understandings and practices through systemic co-inquiry. Water, 8(11), 540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ha, T. M., Bosch, O. J., & Nguyen, N. C. (2016). Practical contributions of the systems-based Evolutionary Learning Laboratory to knowledge and stakeholder management. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 29(3), 261–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ison, R. (2010). Systems practice: How to act in a climate change world. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ison, R. (2016). What is systemic about innovation systems? The implications for policies. Governance and institutionalization. In J. Francis, L. Mytelka, A. van Huis, & N. Röling (Eds.), Innovation systems: Towards effective strategies in support of smallholder farmers (pp. 37–52). Wageningen: Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA) and Wageningen University and Research (WUR)/Convergence of Sciences-Strengthening Innovation Systems (CoS-SIS).Google Scholar
  14. Ison, R., & Shelley, M. (2016). Governing in the Anthropocene: Contributions from systems thinking in practice? Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 33(5), 589–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ison, R. L., Collins, K. B., & Wallis, P. J. (2015). Institutionalising social learning: Towards systemic and adaptive governance. Environmental Science & Policy, 53, 105–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ison, R., Davidson, S., & Wallis, P. (2016). Proposal to create a ‘Learning Laboratory’. Concept note for Monash University, Sustainability Institute’s ‘Systemic Governance Research Program (Unpublished).Google Scholar
  17. Kajikawa, Y. (2008). Research core and framework of sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 3(2), 215–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P., et al. (2012). Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: Practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science, 7(1), 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Law, P., & Jelfs, A. (2016). Ten years of open practice: A reflection on the impact of OpenLearn. Open Praxis, 8(2), 143–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lazarus, R. J. (2008). Super wicked problems and climate change: Restraining the present to liberate the future. Cornell Law Review, 94, 1153.Google Scholar
  21. Le Blanc, D. (2015). Towards integration at last? The sustainable development goals as a network of targets. Sustainable Development, 23(3), 176–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leal Filho, W. (2011). About the role of universities and their contribution to sustainable development. Higher Education Policy, 24(4), 427–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martin, S., Brannigan, J., & Hall, A. (2005). Sustainability, systems thinking and professional practice. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29(1), 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Munro, E., Turnell, A., & Murphy, T. (2016). ‘You can’t grow roses in concrete’. Organisational reform to support high quality signs of safety practice. Action Research Final Report. Signs of Safety English Innovations Project. http://munroturnellmurphy.com/eip-report/.
  25. Oldekop, J. A., Fontana, L. B., Grugel, J., Roughton, N., Adu-Ampong, E. A., Bird, G. K., et al. (2016). 100 Key research questions for the post-2015 development agenda. Development Policy Review, 34(1), 55–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Patton, M. Q. (2011). Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. New York City: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  27. Ramage, M., & Shipp, K. (2009a). Geoffrey Vickers. In Systems thinkers (pp. 77–86). London: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Ramage, M., & Shipp, K. (2009b). Russell Ackoff. In Systems thinkers (pp. 139–147). London: Springer.Google Scholar
  29. Reynolds, M. (2011). Bells that still can ring: Systems thinking in practice. In A. Tait & K. Richardson (Eds.), Moving forward with complexity: Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on complex systems thinking and real world applications (pp. 327–349). Litchfield Park, AZ: Emergent Publications.Google Scholar
  30. Reynolds, M. (2013). Managing systemic risk using systems thinking in practice. AWER Procedia Advances in Applied Sciences, 1, 217–224.Google Scholar
  31. Reynolds, M. (2014). Triple-loop learning and conversing with reality. Kybernetes, 43(9/10), 1381–1391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reynolds, M. (2015). (Breaking) The iron triangle of evaluation. IDS Bulletin, 46(1), 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reynolds, M., & Holwell, S. (2010). Epilogue: Systems approaches and systems practice. In M. Reynolds & S. Holwell (Eds.), Systems approaches to managing change: A practical guide (pp. 293–306). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Reynolds, M., Amato, V., Pinder, R., & Scott, E. (2017). Facilitating effective implementation of global goals for sustainable development through applied systems thinking. Concept Note (Unpublished). Google Scholar
  35. Reynolds, M., Shah, R., Wedlock, E., Ison, R., & Blackmore, C. (2016a). Enhancing systems thinking in practice at the workplace: eSTEeM final report. The OU Centre for STEM Pedagogy. Milton Keynes: The Open University.Google Scholar
  36. Reynolds, M., Gates, E., Hummelbrunner, R., Marra, M., & Williams, B. (2016b). Towards systemic evaluation. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 33(5), 662–673.Google Scholar
  37. Scanlon, E., McAndrew, P., & O’Shea, T. (2015). Designing for educational technology to enhance the experience of learners in distance education: How open educational resources, learning design and Moocs are influencing learning. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2015(1).Google Scholar
  38. Stafford-Smith, M., Griggs, D., Gaffney, O., Ullah, F., Reyers, B., Kanie, N., et al. (2016). Integration: The key to implementing the sustainable development goals. Sustainability Science. doi: 10.1007/s11625-016-0383-3.Google Scholar
  39. Sterling, S. (2004). Higher education, sustainability, and the role of systemic learning. In Higher education and the challenge of sustainability (pp. 49–70). Springer.Google Scholar
  40. Stibbe, A. (Ed.). (2009). The handbook of sustainability literacy: Skills for a changing world. Totnes: Green Books.Google Scholar
  41. Yarime, M., Trencher, G., Mino, T., Scholz, R. W., Olsson, L., Ness, B., et al. (2012). Establishing sustainability science in higher education institutions: Towards an integration of academic development, institutionalization, and stakeholder collaborations. Sustainability Science, 7(1), 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Reynolds
    • 1
    Email author
  • Christine Blackmore
    • 1
  • Ray Ison
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Rupesh Shah
    • 1
  • Elaine Wedlock
    • 1
  1. 1.Applied Systems Thinking in Practice (ASTiP) Group, School of Engineering and Innovation, Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)The Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK
  2. 2.Centre for Policy DevelopmentSydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Institute for Sustainable FuturesUniversity of Technology AustraliaSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations