Being, Doing, and Becoming: Fostering Possibilities for Agentive Dialogue

Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Cultural Psychology of Education book series (CPED, volume 5)

Abstract

In recent decades, efforts toward standardization in U.S. classrooms have limited what and how students and teachers express the many cultural stances they bring to teaching and learning, providing little to no room for students and teachers to act in agentive ways. Drawing on Bakhtinian and Dialogical Self Theory, we focus on two case studies, both part of larger qualitative studies, to explore how a student and teacher engaged in dialogues with the many cultural I-positions within and the many cultural contexts they encountered. We profile a transgender youth’s heteroglossia in motion and “otherness in the self” as he aimed to support his own and others’ selves-in-dialogue. We also describe a secondary English teacher who, through dialogue with his many I-positions that converged in his classroom, positioned himself as an advocate for un(der)documented students. Finally, we discuss issues these dialogues and contexts raised and consider what is it that schools can and should be doing to foster possibilities for agentive dialogue that supports being, doing, and becoming.

Keywords

agency Bakhtin becoming Dialogical Self Theory dialogue teacher transgender undocumented 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Altman, I. (2016). Ian’s story. In B. Fecho, M. Falter & X. Hong (Eds.), Teaching outside the box: making room for dialogue (pp. 45–63). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bakhtin, M. (1981). Discourse in the novel. In M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination (trans: Emerson, C. & Holquist, M.). (pp. 259–422). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bakhtin, M. (1984). Rabelais and his world. (trans: Iswolsky, H.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cooper, M., & Hermans, H. J. M. (2007). Honoring self-otherness: alterity and the intrapersonal. In L. Simao & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Otherness in question: labyrinths of the self (pp. 305–15). Greenwich: Information Age.Google Scholar
  5. Fecho, B. (2011). Teaching for the students: habits of heart, mind, and practice in the engaged classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  6. Fecho, B., & Clifton, J. (2017). Dialoguing across cultures, identities, and earning: crosscurrents and complexities in literacy classrooms. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  8. Hermans, H., & Dimaggio, G. (2007). Self, identity, and globalization in times of uncertainty: a dialogical analysis. Review of General Psychology, 11(1), 31–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hermans, H., & Hermans-Konopka, A. (2010). Dialogical self theory: positioning and counter-positioning in a globalizing society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hermans, H., & Kempen, H. (1993). The dialogical self: meaning as movement. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hermans, H., Konopka, A., Oosterwegel, A., & Zomer, P. (2016). Fields of tension in a boundary-crossing world: towards a democratic organization of the self. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. 1–31. Springerlink.comGoogle Scholar
  12. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (vol. 1). London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Joseph, J. (2006). Applied linguistics and the choices people make (or do they?). International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 237–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Lyons, S. (2010). X-marks: native signatures of assent. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Nikulin, D. (2006). On dialogue. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  18. Phillips, K. (2006). Rhetorical maneuvers: subjectivity, power, and resistance. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 39(4), 310–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rickert, T. (2013). Ambient rhetoric: the attunements of rhetorical being. Pittsburgh: U of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Springsteen, B. (2016). Born to run. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  21. Steensma, T. D., McGuire, J. K., & Kreukels, B. P. C., et al. (2013). Factors associated with desistence and persistence of childhood gender dysphoria: a quantitative follow-up study. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 52(6), 582–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tannehill, B. (2014). Do your homework, Dr. Ablow. Huffpost Queer Voices. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brynn-tannehill/how-much-evidence-does-it_b_4616722.html. Accessed 11 Jan 2017.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of English (Rhetoric and Writing Studies)The University of Texas at El PasoEl PasoUSA
  2. 2.English Education Program Teachers CollegeColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations