Advertisement

Method in Madness: A Case Study in Practice Research Methods

  • Erik KnudsenEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

To embark on the making of a feature film is sheer madness. Yet some of us cannot help but be driven to engage with this form by adopting creative and managerial methods, routines, processes and discourses that help us navigate our way towards creating some kind of impact. In this chapter, I seek to describe and articulate an example of a film project as research, with a particular emphasis on looking at how documentation and critical reflection form the core methodology of the project. In the madness that is filmmaking, how can methodology and method be employed to provide the basis for rigour in the research enquiry?

References

  1. Adams, J. (2013). Presenting the Evidence: The REF Output Statement and Portfolio. Journal of Media Practice, 14(4), 279–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bresson, R. (1967). Mouchette [Film]. France.Google Scholar
  3. Ceylan, N. B. (1998). Kasaba [Film]. Turkey.Google Scholar
  4. Davidson, R. (1983). The Courage to Doubt. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
  5. HEFCE. (2016). Evaluation of REF 2014. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/rsrch/REFreview/. Accessed 14 Nov 2016.
  6. Knudsen, E. (1991). One Day Tafo [Film]. UK.Google Scholar
  7. Knudsen, E. (2010). Zen and the Art of Film Narrative. Journal of Screenwriting, 1(2), 343–355.Google Scholar
  8. Knudsen, E. (2015a). Eyes and Narrative Perspectives on Story: A Practice Led Exploration of the Use of Eyes and Eye Lines in Fiction Film. Journal of Media Practice, 15(1), 3–20.Google Scholar
  9. Knudsen, E. (2015b). The Raven on the Jetty [Film]. UK.Google Scholar
  10. Knudsen, E. (2015c). The Raven on the Jetty [Production Scrapbook and DVD of the Film]. Todmorden: One Day Films.Google Scholar
  11. Knudsen, E. (2016). The Total Filmmaker: Thinking of Screenwriting, Directing and Editing as One Role. New Writing: The International Journal for the Practice and Theory of Creative Writing, 13(1), 109–129.Google Scholar
  12. Knudsen, E. (2017). Doubt [Film]. UK.Google Scholar
  13. Leonard, D., & Sensiper, S. (1998). The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation. California Management Review, 40, 112–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nelson, R. (2013). Practice as Research in the Arts. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. One Day Films. onedayfilms.com. Accessed 29 Aug 2016.
  16. Reed-Danahay, D. E. (Ed.). (1997). Auto/Ethnography: Rewriting the Self and the Social. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  17. Rouch, J., & Morin, E. (1961). Chronicle of a Summer [Film]. France.Google Scholar
  18. Silverman, D. (2000). Doing Qualitative Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Stein, G. (1992). Sacred Emily in Geography of Plays. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press. Google Scholar
  20. The Raven on the Jetty. theravenonthejetty.com. Accessed 29 Aug 2016.
  21. REF. (2014). Research Excellence Framework 2014 Overview Report by Main Panel D and Sub-Panels 27 to 36. REF 2014 was Conducted Jointly by the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE), the Scottish Funding Council (SFC), the Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (HEFCW) and the Department for Employment and Learning, Northern Ireland (DEL), http://www.ref.ac.uk/media/ref/content/expanel/member/Main%20Panel%20D%20overview%20report.pdf. Accessed 29 Aug 2016.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Central LancashireLancashireUK

Personalised recommendations