Advertisement

The Primacy of Practice: Establishing the Terms of Reference of Creative Arts and Media Research

  • Desmond BellEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter seeks to define some of the key terms at play in discussions of practice-based arts and media research, and places this endeavour in its institutional setting. A review of the various forms of arts research currently being practiced in higher education reveals the marginalisation of the forms of research and project development conducted by artists in the course making their work, which the academy is loath to acknowledge. To advance the artistic research paradigm, we may need a broader historical perspective on artistic research. The historic avant-garde pioneered a revolution in arts pedagogy in the first decades of the twentieth century, and this provides the basis for the emergence of a tradition of artistic theorising and research practice that we can continue to learn from. The chapter sketches the model of artistic research that emerged at this time, and argues that this still has cogency for contemporary practice-based, creative arts and media research.

References

  1. Aumont, J. (1987). Montage Eisenstein. London: BFI.Google Scholar
  2. Barry Lyndon. (1975). Dir. Stanley Kubrick, Warner Bros, USA, 187 mins.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, D. (2004). Practice Makes Perfect: Film and Media Studies and the Challenge of Creative Practice. Media, Culture and Society, 26(5), 737–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell, D. (2006). Creative Film and Media Practice as Research: In Pursuit of the Obscure Object of Knowledge. Journal of Media Practice, 7(2), 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell, D. (Ed.). (2016). Mind the Gap: Working Papers on Practice-Based Doctoral Research in the Creative Arts and Media. Dublin: Distillers Press.Google Scholar
  6. Borgdoff, H. (2013). A Brief Survey of Current Debates on the Concepts and Practices of Research in the Arts. In M. Wilson and S. van Ruiten (Eds.), SHARE Handbook for Artistic Research Education. Available at: http://www.elia-artschools.org/userfiles/Image/customimages/products/120/share-handbook-for-artistic-research-education-high-definition.pdf. Accessed 27 Feb 2017.
  7. Bruzzi, S. (2000). New Documentary: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Frayling, C. (1993). Research in Art and Design. Royal College of Art Research Papers, 1(1), 1–5.Google Scholar
  9. Gordon, D., & Parreno, P. (2005–2006). Zidane: A 21st Century Portrait. Edinburgh: The Scottish National Gallery of Modern Art.Google Scholar
  10. Nicholls, B. (1991). Representing Reality: Issues and Concepts in Documentary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Read, H. (1968). A Concise History of Modern Art. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
  12. Sheikh, S. (2009). Objects of Study or Commodification of Knowledge? Remarks on Artistic Research. Art and Research: A Journal of Ideas, Context and Methods 2(2). Available at: http://www.artandresearch.org.uk/v2n2/sheikh.html. Accessed 28 Feb 2017.
  13. Tarnation. (2003). Dir. Jonathan Caouette, Wellspring Media, USA, 91 mins.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National College of Art and DesignDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations