Advertisement

A ‘Logical’ Explanation of Screen Production as Method-Led Research

  • Susan KerriganEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Screen production research brings new knowledge to the practice of filmmaking, screenwriting, and digital media production. This type of creative research is attractive to those who have worked professionally, are aspiring to do so, or want an academic career specialising in screen production practice. Choosing an appropriate methodology, epistemology and ontology that supports an enquiry into practice requires a deeper appreciation of the philosophical position of the researcher, who chooses to examine their subjective point of view through their creative practice. This chapter provides an explanation of an appropriate research design to allow a screen production researcher to logically defend their research enquiry and decision to use practice, be that filmmaking, screenwriting or editing, as a method that leads the research process. This aligns with practice-led, research-led, practice-based and practice as research, which are popular approaches used in creative practice research enquiries.

References

  1. Banks, M. (2005). Visual Anthropology: Image, Object and Interpretation. In J. Prosser (Ed.), Image Based Research: A Sourcebook for Qualitative Researchers. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, D. (2008). Is There a Doctor in the House? A Riposte to Victor Burgin on Practice-Based Arts and Audiovisual Research. Journal of Media Practice, 9(2), 171–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blaikie, N. (1993). Approaches to Social Enquiry. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. Blaikie, N. (2000). Approaches to Social Enquiry: Advancing Knowledge. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bolt, B. (2007). The Magic is in Handling. In E. Barrett & B. Bolt (Eds.), Practice as Research: Approaches to Creative Arts Enquiry (pp. 27–34). London and New York: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  6. Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Candy, L., & Edmonds, E. (2011). The Role of the Artefact and Frameworks for Practice-Based Research. In M. Biggs & H. Karlsson (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts (pp. 120–138). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Crotty, M. (1998). The Foundations of Social Research. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  9. Dallow, P. (2003). Representing Creativeness: Practice-Based Approaches to Research in Creative Arts. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 2(1&2), 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Daymon, C., & Holloway, I. (2011). Choosing Between Different Types of Research. In C. Daymon & I. Holloway (Eds.), Qualitative Research Methods in Public Relations and Marketing Communications (2nd ed., pp. 99–113). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Frayling, C. (1997). Practice-Based Doctorates in the Creative and Performing Arts and Design. Coventry: UK Council for Graduate Education.Google Scholar
  12. Grix, J. (2004). The Foundations of Research (2nd ed.). Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Haseman, B. (2006). A Manifesto for Performative Research. Media International Australia Incorporating Culture and Policy, 118, 98–106.Google Scholar
  14. Kerrigan, S. (2016). Creative Documentary Practice. In P. McIntyre, J. Fulton, & E. Paton (Eds.), The Creative System in Action. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Kerrigan, S., & Callaghan, J. (2016). The Filmmakers’ Research Perspectives: An Overview of Australian and UK Filmmaking Research. Refereed Proceedings: Australian Screen Production Education and Research Association Annual Conference: Screen Production Research: The Big Questions, 5–7 July 2016, University of Canberra. www.aspera.org.au/research/conferenceproceedings/2016. Accessed January 22, 2017.
  16. Kerrigan, S., Berkeley, L., Maher, S., Sergi, M., & Wotherspoon, A. (2015). Screen Production Enquiry: A Study of Five Australian Doctorates. Studies in Australasian Cinema, 9(2), 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Maher, S. (2010). Noir and the Urban Imaginary. PhD in Creative Works, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane.Google Scholar
  18. Marsh, D., & Furlong, P. (2002). A Skin, Not a Sweater: Ontology and Epistemology in Political Science. In D. Marsh & G. Stoker (Eds.), Theory and Methods in Political Science (pp. 17–41). Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Mason, J. (1998). Qualitative Researching. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. McIntyre, P. (2006). Creative Practice as Research: ‘Testing Out’ the Systems Model of Creativity through Practitioner Based Enquiry. Paper presented at the Speculations and Innovations: Applying Practice Led Research in the Creative Industries Conference, Queensland University of Technology.Google Scholar
  21. Meany, M., & Clark, T. (2012). Chat-bot Humour: A Survey of Methodological Approaches for a Creative New Media Project. The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge, and Society, 8(1), 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Milech, B., & Schilo, A. (2004). ‘Exit Jesus’: Relating the Exegesis and Creative/Production Component of a Research Thesis. TEXT, Special Issue No. 3 (April). Retrieved from www.textjournal.com.au/speciss/issue3/milechschilo.htm
  23. Murray, L., & Lawrence, B. (2000). Practitioner-Based Enquiry: Principles for PostGraduate Research. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  24. Ruddock, A. (2001). Understanding Audiences. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schön, D. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  26. Smith, H., & Dean, R. (2009). Practice-Led Research and Research-Led Practice in the Creative Arts. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Spencer, S. (2011). Visual Research Methods in the Social Sciences: Awakening Vision. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Sullivan, G. (2005). Art Practice as Research: Inquiry in the Visual Arts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Wadsworth, Y. (1998). What is Participatory Action Research. Action Research International, Paper 2.Google Scholar
  30. Wiles, R. (2013). What are Qualitative Research Ethics? London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of NewcastleNewcastleAustralia

Personalised recommendations