Advertisement

South China Sea as a Microcosm of Chinese Foreign Policy and Prospects for Asian Polarization

  • Dean Karalekas
Chapter
Part of the Critical Studies of the Asia-Pacific book series (CSAP)

Abstract

Western prognostications about China have been largely inaccurate as they have been predicated on misunderstandings of that government’s motivations and desired outcomes: misunderstandings too often engendered by simply imposing Western values and aspirations on Chinese words and actions. An analysis of China’s foreign-policy actions in pursuing its South China Sea (SCS) claims demonstrates three things: (1) that the forces of history play an indispensable role in framing the foreign-policy goals and aspirations of leaders in Beijing; (2) that efforts by Western powers to adopt China policies designed to entice political liberalization have not worked; and (3) that Beijing employs a realist framework when setting regional plans and priorities. This chapter examines these processes to determine Beijing’s framework for conflict resolution in the SCS. It concludes that realism dominates foreign-policy formulation in Beijing and that this dooms efforts by other powers to employ policies based on liberalism or constructivism to defuse tensions. It then offers some predictions for how this dynamic will affect political developments in the contested waters.

References

  1. Angle, Stephen C. Human Rights and Chinese Thought: A Cross-Cultural Inquiry. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  2. Bachman, David. “Structure and Process in the Making of Chinese Foreign Policy.” In China and the World: Chinese Foreign Policy Faces the New Millennium, edited by Samuel S. Kim. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  3. Brooks, G. G., and William C. Wohlforth. “The Once and Future Superpower: Why China Won’t Overtake the United States.” Foreign Affairs, 2016.Google Scholar
  4. Buzan, Barry, and Rosemary Foot. Does China Matter?: A Reassessment: Essays in Memory of Gerald Segal. London: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar
  5. Coutaz, Gregory. “Disaster Management in the South China Sea: A Chance for Peace and Cooperation.” In Beneath the Surface: Enterprises, Localities, People, and Policy in the South China Sea, edited by Jonathan Spangler, Dean Karalekas, and Moises Lopes de Souza. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.Google Scholar
  6. Dorn, James A. “U.S.-China Relations: The Case for Economic Liberalism.” The Cato Journal 26, no. 3 (September 2006): 425–43.Google Scholar
  7. Gilley, Bruce. “Elite-Led Democratization in China: Prospects, Perils, and Policy Implications.” International Journal 61, no. 2 (2006): 341–58. doi: 10.2307/40204162.Google Scholar
  8. Goldstein, Avery, Rising to the Challenge: China’s Grand Strategy and International Security. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  9. Holmes, James. “Offshore Balancing and Taiwan.” The Taipei Times, June 3, 2011.Google Scholar
  10. Huisken, Ron. “Civilizing the Anarchical Society: Multilateral Security Processes in the Asia-Pacific.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 24, no. 2 (2002): 187–202. doi: 10.1355/cs24-2a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Itzkoff, Seymour. “China—Emerging Hegemony: A Speculative Essay.” The Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies 28, no. 4 (Winter 2003): 487–96.Google Scholar
  12. Kang, David C. China Rising: Peace, Power, and Order in East Asia. New York: Columbia University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
  13. Krauthammer, Charles. “The Unipolar Moment Revisited.” The National Interest 70 (Winter 2002): 5–17.Google Scholar
  14. Ma, Ying. “China’s Stubborn Anti-Democracy.” Policy Review 141 (February 1, 2007). http://www.aei.org/publication/chinas-stubborn-anti-democracy/. Accessed February 4, 2017.
  15. Metzger, Thomas A. “How Serious Is the Divergence Between Western Liberalism and the Political Logic of Chinese Civilization?” China Review International 14, no. 1 (Spring 2007): 1–19. doi:10.1353/cri.0.0033.Google Scholar
  16. “Senkaku Boat Incident Update: China’s Petty Tactics.” Japan Probe, September 22, 2010. http://www.japanprobe.com/2010/09/22/senkaku-boat-incident-update-chinas-petty-tactics/. Accessed February 4, 2017.
  17. Shambaugh, David. “China’s Propaganda System: Institutions, Processes and Efficacy.” The China Journal 57 (January 2007): 25–58. doi: 10.1086/tcj.57.20066240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shiraishi, Takashi. “Chinese Motives Behind the Senkaku Incident.” Japan Echo Web, November 2, 2010.Google Scholar
  19. Souza, Moises Lopes. “Beneath the Surface of Consensus: The Development of Confidence-Building Measures Between the PRC and ASEAN in the South China Sea Disputes.” In Beneath the Surface: Enterprises, Localities, People, and Policy in the South China Sea, edited by Jonathan Spangler, Dean Karalekas, and Moises Lopes de Souza. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.Google Scholar
  20. Stuart-Fox, Martin. A Short History of China and Southeast Asia: Tribute, Trade and Influence. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin, 2003.Google Scholar
  21. Tang, Shiping, and Yunling Zhang. “China’s Regional Strategy.” In Power Shift: China and Asia’s New Dynamics, edited by David Shambaugh, 48–68. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2006.Google Scholar
  22. Walt, Stephen M. “International Relations: One World, Many Theories.” Foreign Policy, Special Edition: Frontiers of Knowledge, no. 110 (Spring 1998): 29–32, 34–46. doi: 10.2307/1149275.
  23. Wang, Qingxin Ken. Hegemonic Cooperation and Conflict: Postwar Japan’s China Policy and the United States. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2000.Google Scholar
  24. Zehfuss, Maja. Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhuang, Junju. “China’s Socialist Market Economy and Its Difference from Neoliberalism.” Nature, Society, and Thought 20, no. 3/4 (2007).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dean Karalekas
    • 1
  1. 1.Taiwan Center for Security StudiesTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations