Advertisement

Science Diplomacy and Dispute Management in the South China Sea

  • James Borton
Chapter
Part of the Critical Studies of the Asia-Pacific book series (CSAP)

Abstract

Protecting marine environments and ensuring the ocean’s sustainability is a global issue, and nowhere is this more important right now than in the South China Sea, a body of water offering abundant and complex marine ecosystems. However, because of disputed territorial claims between China, Vietnam, Taiwan, the Philippines, Malaysia, and Brunei, the South China Sea disputes remain a serious threat to political and ecological security in Southeast Asia. Science diplomacy is advantageous to this dispute management process, and the probability that it can contribute to successfully managing it is high. It is imperative that global scientific, conservation, and legal communities unite to halt coral reef destruction, biodiversity loss, and fisheries depletion. This chapter offers a framework aimed at achieving cooperation and ensuring security in the region.

Bibliography

  1. ABS-CBN News. “PNoy: JMSU with China, Vietnam ‘Shouldn’t Have Happened’.” ABS-CBN News (Quezon City), January 4, 2011. http://news.abs-cbn.com/nation/01/04/11/pnoy-jmsu-china-vietnam-shouldnt-have-happened. Accessed March 14, 2017.
  2. Amindoni, Ayomi. “Indonesia Ready to Drive Peace, Prosperity in Asia: Jokowi.” The Jakarta Post, May 27, 2016. http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2016/05/27/indonesia-ready-to-drive-peace-prosperity-in-asia-jokowi.html. Accessed March 14, 2017.
  3. Ataka, Hiroaki. “Geopolitics or Geobody Politics? Understanding the Rise of China and its Actions in the South China Sea.” Asian Journal of Peacebuilding 4, no. 1 (June 2016), 77–95. http://tongil.snu.ac.kr/xe/ajp. Accessed March 14, 2017.
  4. Bensurto, Henry S. Jr. “Cooperation in the South China Sea: Views on the Philippines – Vietnam Cooperation on Maritime and Ocean Concerns.” Program for East Sea (South China Sea) Studies (blog). July 20, 2011. Second International Workshop on the South China Sea. http://nghiencuubiendong.vn/en/conferences-and-seminars-/second-international-workshop/593-593-. Accessed March 14, 2017.
  5. Bergenas, Johan, and Ariella Knight. Secure Oceans: Collaborative Policy and Technology Recommendations for the World’s Largest Crime Scene. Washington, DC: The Stimson Center, 2016. https://www.stimson.org/sites/default/files/file-attachments/Secure-Oceans.pdf. Accessed March 14, 2017.
  6. Bertelsen, Rasmus G., and Vincent F. Gallucci. “The Return of China, Post-Cold War Russia and the Arctic: Changes on Land and at Sea.” Marine Policy 72 (2016), 240–45.Google Scholar
  7. Berkman, Paul A., Michael Lang, David W. Walton, and Oran R. Young, editors. Science Diplomacy: Antarctica, Science, and the Governance of International Spaces. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press, 2011.Google Scholar
  8. Boisseau du Rocher, Sophie. “Scientific Cooperation in the South China Sea: Another Lever for China.” The Strategist: The Australian Strategic Policy Institute Blog. October 1, 2015. https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/scientific-cooperation-in-the-south-china-sea-another-lever-for-china/. Accessed March 14, 2017.
  9. Borton, James. “After The Hague, ASEAN Must Reach an Ecological Security Consensus.” Geopolitical Monitor, July 19, 2016a. https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/after-the-hague-asean-must-reach-an-ecological-security-consensus/. Accessed March 14, 2017.
  10. Borton, James. “Dispatches from the East Sea: Vietnam Showcases Island’s Environmental Policy.” Geopolitical Monitor, June 29, 2016b. https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/dispatches-from-the-east-sea-vietnam-showcases-islands-environmental-policy/. Accessed March 14, 2017.
  11. Cassotta, Sandra. “Re: Science Diplomacy.” Message to James Borton. Email, November 22, 2016.Google Scholar
  12. Chu, Manh Trinh. “Re: Question/Answer for Publication from James Borton.” Message to James Borton. Email, October 10, 2016.Google Scholar
  13. Delizo, Michael Joe T., Llanesca T. Panti, and Jefferson Antiporda. “Dispute Not Over Yet – Analyst.” The Catholic Media Network (Manila), July 13, 2016. http://www.catholicmedianetwork.org/2016/07/dispute-not-over-yet-analyst/. Accessed March 14, 2017.
  14. Dokken, Karin. “Environment, Security and Regionalism in the Asia-Pacific: Is Environmental Security a Useful Concept?” The Pacific Review 14, no. 4 (2010), 509–30.Google Scholar
  15. Glaser, Bonnie. “Re: Renewed Communication from James Borton, Environmental Policy Writer Working on SCS Science Diplomacy Policy Paper.” Message to James Borton. Email, November 3, 2016.Google Scholar
  16. Gomez, E.D. “Destroyed Reefs, Vanishing Giant Clams: Marine Imperialism.” In In the Wake of Arbitration. Papers from the Sixth Annual CSIS South China Sea Conference, edited by Murray Hiebert, Gregory B. Poling, and Conor Cronin, 113–23. Lanham, Boulder, New York. London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2017.Google Scholar
  17. Harvard Law School. Stakeholder Assessment Prepared for the Devising Seminar on Arctic Fisheries. Cambridge, MA: Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School, 2014a. https://scienceimpact.mit.edu/sites/default/files/documents/AFDS_StakeholderAssessment.pdf. Accessed March 14, 2017.
  18. Harvard Law School. Summary Report Prepared for the Devising Seminar on Arctic Fisheries. Cambridge, MA: Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School, 2014b. https://lawrencesusskind.mit.edu/sites/default/files/documents/AFDS_SummaryReport.pdf. Accessed March 14, 2017.
  19. Hong, Nong. “Marine Environmental Security as a Driving Force of Cooperation in the South China Sea.” Paper presented at Taiwan and the 2016 Elections: The Road Ahead – The Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference on Taiwan Affairs, Walker Institute of International and Area Studies University of South Carolina, September 24, 2016.Google Scholar
  20. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. “History of IIASA.” IIASA – International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. Last modified July 11, 2016. http://www.iiasa.ac.at/web/home/about/whatisiiasa/history/history_of_iiasa.html. Accessed March 14, 2017.
  21. Knoblich, Ruth. “The Role of Science and Technology in the Dynamics of Global Change and the Significance of International Knowledge Cooperation in the Post-Western World: An Interview with Dirk Messner.” In The Global Politics of Science and Technology, edited by Maximilian Mayer, Mariana Carpes, and Ruth Knoblich, 267–73. Berlin: Springer, 2014.Google Scholar
  22. Krasner, Stephen D. “Think Again: Sovereignty.” Foreign Policy, November 20, 2009. http://foreignpolicy.com/2009/11/20/think-again-sovereignty/. Accessed March 14, 2017.
  23. Mak, J.N. “Sovereignty in ASEAN and the Problem of Maritime Cooperation in the South China Sea.” In Security and International Politics in the South China Sea: Toward a Co-operative Management Regime, edited by Sam Bateman and Ralf Emmers, 110–27. London: Routledge, 2009. Routledge Security in Asia Pacific SeriesGoogle Scholar
  24. McKirdy, Euan, and Kathy Quiano. “Philippines’ Duterte to US: ‘Do Not Make Us Your Dogs’.” CNN, October 25, 2016. http://edition.cnn.com/2016/10/25/asia/duterte-us-comments/index.html. Accessed March 14, 2017.
  25. McManus, John, Kwang-Tsao Shao, and Szu-Yin Lin. “Toward Establishing a Spratly Islands International Marine Peace Park: Ecological Importance and Supportive Collaborative Activities with an Emphasis on the Role of Taiwan.” Ocean Development & International Law 41, no. 3 Issues in the South China Sea (2010), 270–80.Google Scholar
  26. McManus, John, and James Borton. “The Convergence of Marine Science and Geopolitics in South China Sea.” Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington, DC May 21, 2015. Panel.Google Scholar
  27. Moss, Trefor. “South China Sea Ruling Could Pose Dilemma for Philippines’ Rodrigo Duterte.” The Wall Street Journal, July 12, 2016. http://www.wsj.com/articles/tribunal-ruling-on-south-china-sea-could-create-dilemma-for-philippines-duterte-1468323025. Accessed March 14, 2017.
  28. Nguyen, Chu Hoi. “Re: Question for Attribution in Academic Article Science & Diplomacy Journal.” Message to James Borton. Email, October 1, 2016.Google Scholar
  29. Nguyễn, Chu Hồi. “Phán quyết về môi trường Biển Đông trong vụ Philipin kiện Trung Quốc.” Vietnam Association for Conservation of Nature and Environment (Hanoi), November 11, 2016, 61–4. http://www.vacne.org.vn/phan-quyet-ve-moi-truong-bien-dong-trong-vu-philipin-kien-trung-quoc/215643.html. Accessed March 14, 2017.
  30. Page, Jeremy, and Trefor Moss. “South China Sea Ruling Puts Beijing in a Corner.” The Wall Street Journal, July 11, 2016. https://www.wsj.com/articles/south-china-sea-ruling-puts-beijing-in-a-corner-1468365807. Accessed March 14, 2017.
  31. Parameswaran, Prashanth. “America’s New Maritime Security Initiative for Southeast Asia.” The Diplomat, April 2, 2016. http://thediplomat.com/2016/04/americas-new-maritime-security-initiative-for-southeast-asia/. Accessed March 14, 2017.
  32. Parameswaran, Prashanth. “Malaysia Responds to China’s South China Sea Intrusion.” The Diplomat, June 9, 2015. http://thediplomat.com/2015/06/malaysia-responds-to-chinas-south-china-sea-intrusion/. Accessed March 14, 2017.
  33. Patrick, Stewart M. “Divert Course: Beijing Needs A Way to Save Face in the South China Sea.” Defense One. April 13, 2016. http://www.defenseone.com/ideas/2016/04/divert-course-beijing-needs-way-save-face-south-china-sea/127449/. Accessed March 14, 2017.
  34. Pitcher, Tony J., Reg Watson, Nigel Haggan, Sylvie Guénette, Robin Kennish, Ussif R. Sumaila, David Cook, Keith Wilson, and Albert Leung. “Marine Reserves and the Restoration of Fisheries and Marine Ecosystems in the South China Sea.” Bulletin of Marine Science 66, no. 3 (2000), 543–66. http://www.rsmas.miami.edu/bms/. Accessed March 14, 2017.
  35. Plakokefalos, Ilias. “Environmental Law Aspects of the Arbitral Tribunal Award in the South China Sea Dispute.” December 5, 2016. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2880624. Accessed March 15, 2017.
  36. Ramos, Fidel V. “Breaking the Ice in the South China Sea.” The Straits Times (Singapore), October 13, 2016. http://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/breaking-the-ice-in-the-south-china-sea. Accessed March 14, 2017.
  37. The Royal Society. New Frontiers in Science Diplomacy: Navigating the Changing Balance of Power. London: The Royal Society and AAAS, 2010.Google Scholar
  38. Song, Yann-huei. “A Marine Biodiversity Project in the South China Sea: Joint Efforts Made in the SCS Workshop Process.” The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 26, no. 1 (2011), 119–49. doi: 10.1163/157180811x541413.
  39. The Straits Times. “Thailand, Indonesia Call for Peace and Stability in South China Sea Ahead of Tribunal Ruling.” The Straits Times (Singapore), July 12, 2016. http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/indonesia-urges-all-parties-to-exercise-restraint-ahead-of-south-china-sea-ruling. Accessed March 14, 2017.
  40. Susskind, Larry. “Re: Follow-Up from James Borton Researcher/Writer on Environmental Security in the South China Sea.” Message to James Borton. Email, October 10, 2016.Google Scholar
  41. Susskind, Lawrence E., and Saleem H. Ali. Environmental Diplomacy: Negotiating More Effective Global Agreements, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
  42. Susskind, Lawrence E., and Danya Rumore. “Using Devising Seminars to Advance Collaborative Problem Solving in Complicated Public Policy Disputes.” Negotiation Journal 31, no. 3 (2015), 223–35. doi: 10.1111/nejo.12092.
  43. UN General Assembly. “Convention on the Law of the Sea.” December 10, 1982. http://www.refworld.org/docid/3dd8fd1b4.html. Accessed March 14, 2017.
  44. UNEP. Report of the Sixteenth Meeting of the Coordinating Body on the Seas of East Asia (COBSEA) on the East Asian Seas Action Plan. Bangkok: United Nations Environment Programme EAS/RCU, 2001. http://www.cobsea.org/documents/report_meeting/COBSEA16.pdf. UNEP(DEC)/EAS IG.16/3. Accessed March 14, 2017.
  45. UNEPSCS. “The UNEP/GEF South China Sea Project.” United Nations Environment Program. http://www.unepscs.org/Project_Background.html. Accessed March 14, 2017.
  46. Walsh, Kathleen A. “The Blue Economy & Environmental Security: Implications for the South China Sea.” Paper presented at Taiwan and the 2016 Elections: The Road Ahead – The Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference on Taiwan Affairs, Walker Institute of International and Area Studies University of South Carolina, September 24, 2016.Google Scholar
  47. Xinhua. “Xi: There Is No Gene for Invasion in Our Blood.” China Daily, May 16, 2014. http://usa.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2014-05/16/content_17511170.htm. Accessed March 14, 2017.
  48. Yap, Helen T., and Josh Brann. Terminal Evaluation: Reversing Environmental Degradation Trends in the South China Sea and Gulf of Thailand. United Nations Environment Programme, 2009. http://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/7400/Terminal_evaluation_of_the_UNEP_GEF_project_Reversing_environmental_degradation_trends_in_the_South_China_Sea_and_Gulf_of_Thailand.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Accessed March 14, 2017.
  49. Zou, Xinqing. “Re: Greetings from James Borton Welcome Chinese Comment on Marine Protected Areas.” Message to James Borton. Email, November 26, 2016.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Borton
    • 1
  1. 1.James Borton Nonresident FellowThe Stimson CenterWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations