Advertisement

On the Line pp 235-250 | Cite as

Exploring the Factors Affecting Student Academic Performance in Online Programs: A Literature Review

  • Fotios MisopoulosEmail author
  • Maria Argyropoulou
  • Dionisia Tzavara
Chapter

Abstract

Online education has been receiving an increasing interest, and there are several studies focusing on student satisfaction with fully online or blended learning models. This paper has been written with a view to explore the recent developments and literature in the field of online courses and e-learning education, in general, focusing on pertinent published research. Aiming at an understanding of the factors that have an impact on student performance in the online education, a literature review of the pertinent publications has been conducted. Sixty papers have been carefully reviewed to provide a synthesis of previous and recent findings. To our understanding, this is the first systematic review focusing on student performance in the online setting, and this work will help teachers and institutions develop an understanding of what drives academic performance of online students so that they can create the appropriate e-environment for e-teaching and e-learning.

Keywords

E-learning Online education Student outcomes Student satisfaction Student performance 

References

  1. Al-Azawei, A., & Lundqist, K. (2015). Learner differences in perceived satisfaction of an online learning: An extension to the technologies acceptance model in an Arabic sample. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 13(5), 408–426.Google Scholar
  2. AlHamad, A. Q., Al Qawasmi, K. I., & AlHamad, A. Q. (2014). Key factors in determining students’ satisfaction in online learning based on ‘Web Programming’ course within Zarqa University. International Journal of Global Business, 7(1), 7–14.Google Scholar
  3. AlJeraisy, M. N., Mohammad, H., Fayyoumi, A., & Alrashideh, W. (2015). Web 2.0 in education: The impact of discussion board on student performance and satisfaction. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(2), 247–259.Google Scholar
  4. Al-Mutairi, A. (2011). Factors affecting business students’ performance in Arab Open University: The case of Kuwait. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(5), 146–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Al-Qahtani, A. A., & Higgins, S. E. (2013). Effects of traditional, blended and e-learning on students’ achievement in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(3), 220–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anstine, J., & Skidmore, M. (2005). A small study of traditional and online courses with sample selection adjustment. Journal of Economic Education, 36(2), 107–127.Google Scholar
  7. Arbaugh, J. B., & Rau, B. L. (2007). A study of disciplinary, structural, and behavioral effects on course outcomes in online MBA courses. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 5(1), 65–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ary, E. J., & Brune, C. W. (2011). A comparison of student learning outcomes in traditional and online personal finance courses. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(4), 465–474.Google Scholar
  9. Bennett, D. S., Padgham, G. L., McCarthy, C. S., & Carter, M. S. (2007). Teaching principles of economics: Internet vs. traditional classroom instruction. Journal of Economics and Economic Education Research, 8(1), 21–31.Google Scholar
  10. Beqiri, M., Chase, N., & Bishka, A. (2010). Online course delivery: An empirical investigation of factors affecting student satisfaction. Journal of Education for Business, 85, 95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bowen, W. G., Chingos, M. M., Lack, K. A., & Nygren, T. I. (2012). Interactive learning online at public universities: Evidence from randomized trials. Ithaka S+R, 4–52. https://doi.org/10.18665/sr.22464 http://www.sr.ithaka.org/publications/interactive-learning-online-at-public-universities-evidence-from-randomizedtrials/
  12. Bray, E., Aoki, K., & Dlugosh, L. (2008). Predictors of learning satisfaction in Japanese online distance learners. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(3), 1–24.Google Scholar
  13. Burnett, K., Bonnici, L., Miksa, S., & Kim, J. (2007). Frequency, intensity and topicality in online learning: An exploration of the interaction dimensions that contribute to student satisfaction in online learning. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 48(1), 21–35.Google Scholar
  14. Busato, V., Prins, F., Elshout, J., & Hamaker, C. (1998). The relation between learning styles, the Big Five personality traits and achievement motivation in higher education. Personality and Individual Differences, 26(1), 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Callaway, S. (2012). Implications of online learning: Measuring student satisfaction and learning for online and traditional students. Insights to a Changing World Journal, 2, 1–28.Google Scholar
  16. Calli, L., Balcikanli, C., & Calli, F. (2013). Identifying factors that contribute to the satisfaction of students in E-learning. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14(1), 85–101.Google Scholar
  17. Cavanaugh, C., Hargis, J., & Mayberry, J. (2016). Participation in the virtual environment of blended courses: An activity study of student performance. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 263–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Furnham, A., & Lewis, M. (2007). Personality and approaches to learning predict preference for different teaching methods. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 241–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chen, W. S., & Yao, A. Y. T. (2016). An empirical evaluation of critical factors influencing learner satisfaction in blended learning: A pilot study. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(7), 1667–1671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cole, M., Shelley, D., & Swartz, L. (2014). Online instruction, e-learning, and student satisfaction: A three year study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(6), 112–113.Google Scholar
  21. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO–PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO–FFI): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  22. Cotton, S. J., Dollard, M. F., & de Jonge, J. (2002). Stress and student job design: Satisfaction, well-being and performance in University students. International Journal of Stress Management, 9(3), 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Daymount, T., & Blau, G. (2008). Student performance in online and traditional sections of an undergraduate management course. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 9(3), 275–294.Google Scholar
  24. Dendir, S. (2016). An online premium? Characteristics and performance of online versus face-to-face students in principles of microeconomics. Journal of Education for Business, 91(2), 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dennen, V. P., Darabi, A. A., & Smith, L. J. (2007). Instructor-learner interaction in online courses: The relative perceived importance of particular instructor actions on performance and satisfaction. Distance Education, 28(1), 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Driscoll, A., Jicha, K., Hunt, A. N., Tichavsky, L., & Thompson, G. (2012). Can online courses deliver in-class results? A comparison of student performance and satisfaction in an online versus a face-to-face introductory sociology course. Teaching Sociology, 40(4), 312–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Du, C., & Wu, J. (2014). The effect of human interactions on student performance and satisfaction of blended learning. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 18(3), 11–21.Google Scholar
  28. Duggal, M., & Mehta, P. (2015). Antecedents to academic performance of college students: An empirical investigation. Paradigm, 19(2), 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Eom, S. (2009). Effects of interaction on students’ perceived learning satisfaction in university online education: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Global Management Studies, 1(2), 60–74.Google Scholar
  30. Ferguson, J. M., & DeFelice, A. E. (2010). Length of online course and student satisfaction, perceived learning, and academic performance. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 11(2), 73–84.Google Scholar
  31. Figlio, D. N., Rush, M., & Yin, L. (2010). Is it live or is it internet? Experimental estimates of the effects of online instruction on student learning (Working Paper No. 16089). Location: Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  32. Friday, E., Friday-Stroud, S. S., Green, L. A., & Hill, A. Y. (2006). A multi-semester comparison of student performance between multiple traditional and online sections of two management courses. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 8(1), 66–81.Google Scholar
  33. Gallien, T., & Oomen-Early, J. (2008). Personalized versus collective instructor feedback in the online classroom: Does type of feedback affect student satisfaction, academic performance and perceived connectedness with the instructor? International Journal on E-Learning, 7(3), 463–476.Google Scholar
  34. Gilbert, J., Morton, S., & Rowley, J. (2007). E-learning: The student experience. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 560–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. González-Gómez, F., Guardiola, J., Rodríguez, O. M., & Alonso, M. A. (2012). Gender differences in e-learning satisfaction. Computers & Education, 58, 283–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gray, J., & DiLoreto, M. (2016). The effects of student engagement, student satisfaction, and perceived learning in online learning environments. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 11(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
  37. Grayson, J. P. (2004). The relationship between grades and academic program satisfaction over four years of study. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, XXXIV(2), 1–34.Google Scholar
  38. Haughton, J., & Kelly, A. (2015). Student performance in an introductory Business statistics course: Does delivery mode matter? Journal of Education for Business, 90(1), 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Karemera, D., Reuben, L. J., & Sillah, M. R. (2003). The effects of academic environment and background characteristics on student satisfaction and performance. Student College Journal, 37(2), 298–308.Google Scholar
  40. Kattoua, T., Al-Lozi, M., & Alrowwad, A. (2016). A review of literature on E-learning systems in higher education. International Journal of Business Management and Economic Research (IJBMER), 7(5), 754–762.Google Scholar
  41. Ke, F., & Kwak, D. (2013). Constructs of student-centered on learning satisfaction of a diverse online student body: A structural equation modelling approach. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(1), 97–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A., Belland, B., & Schroder, K. (2014). Interaction, internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ladyshewsky, R. (2013). Instructor presence in online courses and student satisfaction. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lam, M. (2009). Effectiveness of web-based courses on technical learning. Journal of Education for Business, 6, 323–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Li, F., Qi, J., Wang, G., & Wang, X. (2014). Traditional classroom VS E-learning in higher education: Difference between students’ behavioral engagement. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 9(2), 48–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Liaw, S. S. (2008). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education, 51, 864–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lu, H. P., & Chiou, M. J. (2010). The impact of individual differences on e-learning system satisfaction: A contingency approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 307–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Martín-Rodríguez, O., Fernández-Molina, J. C., Montero-Alonso, M. A., & González-Gómez, F. (2015). The main components of satisfaction with e-learning. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(2), 267–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McCoy, L. P. (2005). Effect of demographic and personal variables on achievement in eighth grade algebra. Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 131–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mushtaq, I., & Khan, S. N. (2012). Factors affecting students’ academic performance. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 12(9), 16–22.Google Scholar
  51. Najafabadi, P. A. T., Najafabadi, O. M., & Farid-Roahani, R. M. (2012). Factors contributing to academic achievement: A Bayesian structure equation modelling study. International Journal of Mathematical Education, 44(4), 490–500.Google Scholar
  52. O’Connor, M., & Paunonen, S. (2007). Big Five personality predictors of post-secondary academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 971–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perception of Servqual. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.Google Scholar
  54. Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 401–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pinto, M. B., & Anderson, W. (2013). A little knowledge goes a long way: Student expectation and satisfaction with hybrid learning. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 10, 65–76.Google Scholar
  56. Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceive learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68–88.Google Scholar
  57. Sembring, M. (2015). Validating student satisfaction related to persistence, academic performance, retention and career advancement within ODL perspectives. Open Praxis, 7(4), 325–337.Google Scholar
  58. Stöhr, C., Demazière, C., & Adawi, T. (2016). Comparing student activity and performance in the classroom and a virtual learning environment. Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on e-Learning ECEL. 2016, 15(2048–8637), 664–671.Google Scholar
  59. Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y.-Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50, 1183–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Teo, T., & Wong, S. L. (2013). Modeling key drivers of E-learning satisfaction among student teachers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(1), 71–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Topal, A. D. (2016). Examination of University students’ level of satisfaction and readiness for E-courses and the relationship between them. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 15(1), 7–23.Google Scholar
  62. Umek, L., Aristovnik, A., Tomaževic, N., & Keržic, D. (2015). Analysis of selected aspects of students’ performance and satisfaction in a Moodle-based E-learning system environment. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(6), 1495–1505.Google Scholar
  63. Wickersham, L., & McGee, P. (2008). Perceptions of satisfaction and deeper learning in an online course. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9(1), 73–83.Google Scholar
  64. Wilson, D., & Allen, D. (2014). Success rates of online versus traditional college students. Research in Higher Education, 14, 1–14.Google Scholar
  65. Wu, J. H., Tennyson, R. D., & Hsia, T. L. (2010). A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system evaluation. Computers & Education, 55, 155–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zeitun, R. M., Abdulqader, K. S., & Alshare, K. A. (2013). Team satisfaction and student group performance: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Education for Business, 88(5), 286–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fotios Misopoulos
    • 1
    Email author
  • Maria Argyropoulou
    • 2
  • Dionisia Tzavara
    • 3
  1. 1.University of Liverpool Management School, University of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
  2. 2.Athens University of Economics and BusinessAthensGreece
  3. 3.Laureate Online EducationAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations