Industry-University Collaboration for ICT and E-Government Service Development: Learning from Practice of Innovative Türksat-University Case

Chapter
Part of the Science, Technology and Innovation Studies book series (STAIS)

Abstract

The chapter provides a general account of industry-university collaboration with successful results in Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and e-Government area in Turkey. Presented mostly from the perspective of the industrial institution this successful case hopes to provide certain insights and suggestions for improving the strength and effectiveness of industry-university collaboration. A complementary cross-cultural knowledge management model is also proposed to contribute to the conceptual discussions on collaboration models and interface designs. Accordingly, the paper provides firstly information of the industrial institution and related electronic services and project work on the practice side, then the suggested conceptual framework, and finally gained insights and suggestions for the practice.

Keywords

E-academic services E-government Türksat Information and communication technology Industry-university collaboration Cross-cultural knowledge management Reflection and refraction 

Notes

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Yıldırım Beyazıt University and Turksat, as well as organizers of the 2015 EUROLICS workshop on university-industry interactionat METU for their inspiraton and support for the work that has resulted in this paper.

References

  1. Barth TD (2011). Freedom, equality and the quality of democracy: measuring quality in the top 20 democracies of the democracy ranking. Dissertation (Doctoral thesis). University of Vienna, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  2. Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ (2006) Knowledge creation, diffusion, and use in innovation networks and knowledge clusters. In: Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ (eds) A comparative systems approach across the United States, Europe and Asia. Praeger, Westport, CT, pp 1–25Google Scholar
  3. Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ (2009) “Mode 3” and “quadruple helix”: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. Int J Technol Manag 46(3/4):201–234.  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ (2010) Triple helix, quadruple helix and quintuple helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? A proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. Int J Soc Ecol Sustain Dev 1:41–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eldred M (2007) Dialectic of self and other: wrestling with Plato. Hegel, Heidegger. http://www.arte-fact.org/untpltcl/dlctcslf.html. Accessed 7 Dec 2011
  6. Erdil E (2015) Catching-up and the role of university/industry linkages in emerging economies: case of Turkey. EUROLICS 2015Google Scholar
  7. Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L (2000) The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Res Policy 29:109–123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Geyer F (2002) The march of self-reference. Kybernetes 31(7/8):1021–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goguen JA, Varela FJ (1979) Systems and distinctions: duality and complementarity. Int J Gen Syst 5:31–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kaymaz K, Eryiğit K (2013) Industry university collaboration: suggestions from the perspective of academicians. Cashed presentation material. Accessed 20 Mar 2016Google Scholar
  11. Lenski T (2015) Conflict resolution and the ancient art of Kintsugi. http://www.mediate.com/articles/LenskiTb20150123.cfm. Accessed 15 Mar 2016
  12. Martin M (2000) Managing university-industry relations. UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  13. Medeni TD (2008) Educating knowledge managers for global knowledge economy: an action research into IMPM. Dissertion (Doctoral thesis), JAIST, JapanGoogle Scholar
  14. Medeni TD, Medeni İT (2016) Suggesting a new management information systems education programme for knowledge society: implications from Turkish case. INTCESS 2016, İstanbul, FebruaryGoogle Scholar
  15. Medeni T, Medeni İT, Balci A, Dalbay Ö (2009) Suggesting a framework for transition towards more interoperable e-Government in Turkey: a nautilus model of cross-cultural knowledge creation and organizational learning. Int J eGov eBus Stud I(2):1–13Google Scholar
  16. Ministry of Development (2014) Information society strategy and action plan. Ankara, TurkeyGoogle Scholar
  17. Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Perkmann M, Salter A (2012) How to create productive partnerships with universities. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 53(4):79Google Scholar
  19. Tihon A (2006) The informational attractors: a different approach of information and knowledge management Goguen and Varela 1979Google Scholar
  20. Willner M, Hero G, Weiner J (2006) Global history volume I: The ancient world to the age of revolution. Barron’s Educational Series, HauppaugeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.İşletme FakültesiAnkara Yıldırım Beyazıt UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Uydu Kampüsü GölbaşıTürksatAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations