Scientific Cooperation in a German Polish Border Region in the Light of EU Enlargement

  • Jutta Günther
  • Gresa Latifi
  • Judyta Lubacha-Sember
  • Daniel Töbelmann
Chapter
Part of the Science, Technology and Innovation Studies book series (STAIS)

Abstract

Starting point of this paper is the Eastern enlargement of the EU and the economic advantages and disadvantages for the old and the new EU member states. It focuses on the impact of the enlargement on border regions, especially between Germany and Poland, and introduces into the EU support programs which aim to integrate regions on both sides of the border. The scientific cooperation is picked as an example of cross-border activities which had to be (re-)established after the system break. An empirical study on the example of Europa University Viadrina—a newly founded university in the German-Polish border region—shows the extent of German-Polish cooperation based on co-publication activity.

Keywords

Cross-border cooperation Scientific cooperation EU enlargement Bibliometrics 

Notes

Acknowledgement

We thank Mahmood Shubbak (Faculty of Business Studies and Economics at the University of Bremen) for his kind assistance in running the network analysis and Marcel Lange (Faculty of Business Studies and Economics at the University of Bremen) for his kind assistance in data collection and formatting.

References

  1. Anacka M, Fihel A (2012) Return migration to Poland in the post-accession period. In: Galgoczi B, Leschke J, Watt A (eds) EU labour migration in troubled times. Skills mismatch, return and policy responses. Routledge, London, pp 143–168Google Scholar
  2. Aumann B, Scheufele R (2011) Is east Germany catching up? A time series perspective. Post-Communist Econ 22(2):177–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balazs P et al (eds) (2014) 25 Years after the fall of the iron curtain. The state of integration of East and West in the European Union. European Commission, BrusselGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldwin RE (1995) The eastern enlargement of the European Union. Eur Econ Rev 39(3):474–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baldwin RE, Francois JF, Portes R (1997) The costs and benefits of eastern enlargement: the impact on the EU and central Europe. Econ Policy 12:125–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barrell R, Fitz Gerald J, Riley R (2010) EU enlargement and migration: assessing the macroeconomic impacts. J Common Mark Stud 48(2):373–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boeri T (2002) Who’s afraid of the big enlargement economic and social implications of the European Union’s prospective eastern expansion. Centre for Economic Policy Research, Policy paper no. 7Google Scholar
  8. Boeri T, Brücker H (2001) Eastern enlargement and EU-labour-markets: perceptions, challenges and opportunities. IZA discussion paper series no. 256Google Scholar
  9. Braun T, Glänzel W (1996) International collaboration: will it be keeping alive East European research? Scientometrics 36(2):247–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bröcker J (1998) How would an EU-membership of the Visegrád-countries affect Europe’s economic geography? EU-membership of the Visegrád-countries. Ann Reg Sci 32(1):91–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bröcker J, Jäger-Roschko O (1996) Eastern reforms, trade, and spatial change in the EU. Pap Reg Sci 75(1):23–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brülhart M, Crozet M, Koenig P (2004) Enlargement and the EU periphery: the impact of changing market potential. HWWA discussion paper No. 270Google Scholar
  13. Cieślik A (2005) Location of foreign firms and national border effects: the case of Poland. Tijdschr Econ en Soc Geogr 96(3):287–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cunderlikova M (2007) The European Union Phare programme. National Bank of Slovakia [online]. http://www.nbs.sk/_img/Documents/BIATEC/BIA01_07/13.pdf (last visited 23.06.2016)
  15. Curzon Price V, Landau A (1999) Introduction. The enlargement of the European Union: dealing with complexity. In: Curzon Price V, Landau A, Whitman RG (eds) The enlargement of the European Union. Issues and strategies. Routledge, London, pp 10–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diez T, Stetter S, Albert M (2006) The European Union and border conflicts: the transformative power of integration. Int Organ 60(3):563–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eichhorst W, Wozny F (2012) Migration policies in Germany. Research reports recommendations. Institute of Public Affairs, WarszawaGoogle Scholar
  18. Ellison D (2006) Divide and conquer: the European Union enlargements successful conclusion? Int Stud Rev 8(1):150–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elvert J (2004) A fool’s game or a comedy of errors? EU enlargements in comparative perspective. In: Kaiser W, Elvert J (eds) European Union enlargement a comparative history. Routledge, London, pp 201–221Google Scholar
  20. Epstein RA (2014) Overcoming “economic backwardness” in the European Union. J Common Mark Stud 52(1):17–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Epstein RA, Jacoby W (2014) Eastern enlargement ten years on: transcending the East–West divide? J Common Mark Stud 52(1):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. European Commission (2003) Enlargement of the European Union. An historic opportunity. European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  23. European Commission (2011) European territorial cooperation. Building bridges between people. European Commission—Directorate General for Regional PolicyGoogle Scholar
  24. European University Viadrina (2015) [online] https://www.wiwi.europa-uni.de/en/lehrstuhl/index.html (last visited 05.07.2016)
  25. Forgo B, Jevcak A (2015) Economic convergence of Central and Eastern European EU member states over the last decade (2004–2014). European economy discussion papers, 001|July 2015Google Scholar
  26. Francois JF, Shiells CR (1994) AGE models of North American free trade. In: Francois JF, Shiells CR (eds) Modelling trade policy: applied general equilibrium assessments of North American free trade. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 3–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Glänzel W, Winterhager M (1992) International collaboration of three East European countries with Germany in the sciences, 1980–1989. Scientometrics 25(2):219–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Glänzel W, Schubert A, Czerwon HJ (1999) A bibliometric analysis of international scientific cooperation of the European Union (1985–1995). Scientometrics 45(2):185–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gruchman B, Walk F (1997) Trans-boundary cooperation in the Polish-German border region. In: Ganster P, Lorey DE (eds) Borders and border regions in Europe and North America. SR Books, Lanham, pp 177–191Google Scholar
  30. Heimpold G, Titze M (2014) Development in East Germany since German unification. Results, shortcomings and implications for economic policy. In: Collignon S, Esposito P (eds) Competitiveness in the European economy, Routledge studies in the European economy. Routledge, London, pp 184–196Google Scholar
  31. Henrekson M, Torstensson J, Torstensson R (1997) Growth effects of European integration. Eur Econ Rev 41(8):1537–1557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. INTERREG EUROPE (2015) INTERREG EUROPE 2014–2020. CCI 2014 TC 16 RFIR 001. Cooperation Programme document. FinalGoogle Scholar
  33. Kahanec M, Zimmermann KF (2009) Migration in an enlarged EU: a challenging solution? European economy, Economic papers 363, MarchGoogle Scholar
  34. Kałużyńska M et al (eds) (2014) Poland’s 10 years in the European Union. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, WarszawaGoogle Scholar
  35. Kohl H (2015) Convergence and divergence – 10 years since EU enlargement. Transfer 21(3):285–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lejour AM, De Mooijand AR, Nahuis R (2001) EU enlargement: economic implications for countries and industries. CPB document No 011Google Scholar
  37. Ludwig U (2015) Der unvollendete Aufholprozess der ostdeutschen Wirtschaft. Berl Debatte Initial 26(2):34–49Google Scholar
  38. Mikulić D, Lovrinčević Z, Galić Nagyszombaty A (2013) Regional convergence in the European Union, new Member States and Croatia. South East Eur J Econ Bus 8(1):7–19Google Scholar
  39. Monastriotis V (2011) Regional growth dynamics in Central and Eastern Europe. LSE ‘Europe in question’ discussion paper series, LEQS paper No. 33/2011Google Scholar
  40. Moravcsik A, Vachudova AM (2002) National interests, state power, and EU enlargement. East Eur Polit Soc 17(1):42–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moravcsik A, Vachudova AM (2005) Preferences, power and equilibrium. The causes and consequences of EU enlargement. In: Schimmelfennig F, Sedelmeier U (eds) The politics of European Union enlargement. Theoretical approaches. Routledge, New York, pp 198–212Google Scholar
  42. Niebuhr A (2006) Spatial effects of European integration: do border regions benefit above average? Rev Reg Stud 36(3):254–278Google Scholar
  43. Niebuhr A (2008) The impact of EU enlargement on European border regions. Int J Public Policy 3(3):163–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Niebuhr A, Stiller S (2002) Integration effects in border regions – a survey of economic theory and empirical studies. HWWA discussion paper 179Google Scholar
  45. O’Dowd L (2002) The changing significance of European borders. Reg Fed Stud 12(4):13–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Oblath G, Palocz E, Popper D, Valentinyi A (2015) Economic convergence and structural change in the new member states of the European Union. Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Discussion papers MT-DP – 2015/44Google Scholar
  47. Operationelles Programm zur grenzübergreifenden Zusammenarbeit – Polen (Wojewodschaft Lubuskie) – Brandenburg 2007–2013 im Rahmen der “Europäischen territorialen Zusammenarbeit”, Genehmigt von der Europäischen Kommission am 25.03.2008Google Scholar
  48. Perkmann M (2003) Cross-border regions in Europe significance and drivers of regional cross-border co-operation. Eur Urban Reg Stud 10(2):153–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Preston C (1997) The enlargement and integration of the European Union: issues and strategies. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Program Operacyjny Współpracy Transgranicznej Polska (Województwo Lubuskie) – Brandenburgia 2007–2013 w ramach “Europejskiej Współpracy Terytorialnej”, Zatwierdzony 25 marca 2008 rGoogle Scholar
  51. Pukeliene V, Butkus M (2012) Evaluation of regional β convergence in EU countries at NUTS3 level. Ekonomika 91(2):22–37Google Scholar
  52. Regulation (EC) No 614/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 May 2007 concerning the financial instrument for the environment (LIFE+)Google Scholar
  53. Regulation (EU) No 1293/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on the establishment of a programme for the environment and climate action (LIFE) and repealing Regulation (EC) No 614/2007Google Scholar
  54. Schimmelfennig F, Sedelmeier U (2002) Theorizing EU enlargement: research focus, hypotheses, and the state of research. J Eur Public Policy 9(4):500–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sjursen H (2002) Why expand? The question of legitimacy and justification in the EU’s enlargement policy. J Common Mark Stud 40(3):491–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stefaniak B (1998) International cooperation of polish researchers with partners from Abroad: a scientometric study. Scientometrics 41(1):155–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tebbe G (1994) Wunsch und Wirklichkeit: Das Problem der Osterweiterung. Europa-Archiv 49:389–396Google Scholar
  58. Verdun A (2005) The challenges of European Union: where are we today, how did we get here and what lies ahead. In: Verdun A, Croci O (eds) The European Union in the Wake of Eastern Enlargement: Institutional and Policy-Making Challenges. Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp 9–22Google Scholar
  59. West Pomeranian Business School Report (2012) Cross-border labour mobility between Poland-Germany [online] www.sb-professionals-project.eu/⋯/Case-Study (last visited 23.06.2016)
  60. Zeff EE, Pirro BE (2006) The European Union and the member states. Lynne Rienner, BoulderGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jutta Günther
    • 1
  • Gresa Latifi
    • 2
  • Judyta Lubacha-Sember
    • 3
  • Daniel Töbelmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Business Studies and EconomicsUniversity of BremenBremenGermany
  2. 2.Department of Management, Economics and Industrial EngineeringPolitecnico di MilanoMilanItaly
  3. 3.Institute of Economics, Finance, and ManagementJagiellonian UniversityCracowPoland

Personalised recommendations