Advertisement

Ventral Brainstem Anatomy: An Endoscopic Transoral Perspective

  • Oreste de DivitiisEmail author
  • Alfredo Conti
  • Teresa Somma
  • Flavio Angileri
  • Paolo Cappabianca
Chapter
Part of the Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement book series (NEUROCHIRURGICA, volume 125)

Abstract

In recent years the use of the endoscope through the transclival route has gained new attention as a minimally invasive operative method to successfully treat numerous clival pathologies such as chordomas, meningiomas, haemangiopericytomas, enterogenous and epidermoid cysts, and metastasis(Cappabianca et al. Neurosurgery 55:933–940, 2004; Cappabianca et al. Childs Nerv Syst 20:796–801, 2004; Cappabianca et al. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 33:151–199, 2008; Cappabianca et al. Neurosurgery 49:473–475, 2001; Cappabianca et al. Surg Neurol 62:227–233, 2004; Dehdashti et al. Neurosurgery 63:299–307, 2008; Kerschbaumer et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:2708–2715, 2000; Saito et al. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 154:879–886, 2012; Stippler et al. Neurosurgery 64:268–277, 2009). Here we describe the endoscopic anatomy of the region reached through an endoscopic transoral approach. Fresh and formalin-fixed cadaver specimens were used to demonstrate both the feasibility of an endoscopic transoral–transclival intradural approach and its potential exposure. The transoral approach was performed using a clival opening of 20 × 15 mm. This smaller access point through the clivus, which allowed insertion of the endoscope and its instruments, did not limit the complete exposure of the cisternal spaces and permitted reconstruction of all anatomical layers.

This endoscopic approach thus provides excellent exposure of some of the most dangerous and inaccessible territories of the brain, respecting the anatomy and remaining a minimally invasive approach. Further extensive clinical experience is necessary to prove its safety. The endoscopic transoral–transclival approach will presumably be selected to gain access to lesions of the lower ventral brainstem and the surrounding cisternal spaces, with development of new and more efficient surgical strategies for dural and bone defect repair.

Keywords

Transoral Endoscopy Brainstem Vertebro-basilar system Anatomy Brain tumour 

References

  1. 1.
    Apuzzo ML, Weiss MH, Heiden JS. Transoral exposure of the atlantoaxial region. Neurosurgery. 1978;3:201–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, de Divitiis E. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery. Neurosurgery. 2004;55:933–40. Discussion 940-931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Esposito F, de Divitiis E. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: procedure, endoscopic equipment and instrumentation. Childs Nerv Syst. 2004;20:796–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Esposito F, De Divitiis O, Messina A, De Divitiis E. Extended endoscopic endonasal approach to the midline skull base: the evolving role of transsphenoidal surgery. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg. 2008;33:151–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Mariniello G, de Divitiis O, Romero AD, de Divitiis E. Easy sellar reconstruction in endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery with polyester–silicone dural substitute and fibrin glue: technical note. Neurosurgery. 2001;49:473–5. Discussion 475-476.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Valente V, Romano I, D’Enza AI, Esposito F, et al. Sellar repair with fibrin sealant and collagen fleece after endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery. Surg Neurol. 2004;62:227–33. Discussion 233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cha ST, Jarrahy R, Yong WH, Eby T, Shahinian HK. A rare symptomatic presentation of ecchordosis physaliphora and unique endoscope-assisted surgical management. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2002;45:36–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chan AK, Benet A, Ohya J, Zhang X, Vogel TD, Flis DW, et al. The endoscopic transoral approach to the craniovertebral junction: an anatomical study with a clinical example. Neurosurg Focus. 2016;40(2):E11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Crockard HA, Pozo JL, Ransford AO, Stevens JM, Kendall BE, Essigman WK. Transoral decompression and posterior fusion for rheumatoid atlanto-axial subluxation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986;68:350–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Crockard HA, Sen CN. The transoral approach for the management of intradural lesions at the craniovertebral junction: review of 7 cases. Neurosurgery. 1991;28:88–97. Discussion 97-88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dehdashti AR, Karabatsou K, Ganna A, Witterick I, Gentili F. Expanded endoscopic endonasal approach for treatment of clival chordomas: early results in 12 patients. Neurosurgery. 2008;63:299–307. Discussion 307-299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Di Lorenzo N. Transoral approach to extradural lesions of the lower clivus and upper cervical spine: an experience of 19 cases. Neurosurgery. 1989;24:37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Drake CG. Surgical treatment of ruptured aneurysms of the basilar artery. Experience with 14 cases. J Neurosurg. 1965;23:457–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Drake CG. The surgical treatment of aneurysms of the basilar artery. J Neurosurg. 1968;29:436–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Frempong-Boadu AK, Faunce WA, Fessler RG. Endoscopically assisted transoral–transpharyngeal approach to the craniovertebral junction. Neurosurgery. 2002;51:S60–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    George B, Dematons C, Cophignon J. Lateral approach to the anterior portion of the foramen magnum. Application to surgical removal of 14 benign tumors: technical note. Surg Neurol. 1988;29:484–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    George B, Lot G, Boissonnet H. Meningioma of the foramen magnum: a series of 40 cases. Surg Neurol. 1997;47:371–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gilsbach JM. Extreme lateral approach to intradural lesions of the cervical spine and foramen magnum. Neurosurgery. 1991;28:779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hadley MN, Spetzler RF, Sonntag VK. The transoral approach to the superior cervical spine. A review of 53 cases of extradural cervicomedullary compression. J Neurosurg. 1989;71:16–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    James D, Crockard HA. Surgical access to the base of skull and upper cervical spine by extended maxillotomy. Neurosurgery. 1991;29:411–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Gardner P, Mintz A. Endoneurosurgical hemostasis techniques: lessons learned from 400 cases. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;19:E7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kerschbaumer F, Kandziora F, Klein C, Mittlmeier T, Starker M. Transoral decompression, anterior plate fixation, and posterior wire fusion for irreducible atlantoaxial kyphosis in rheumatoid arthritis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:2708–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    La Corte E, Aldana PR. Endoscopic approach to the upper cervical spine and clivus: an anatomical study of the upper limits of the transoral corridor. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017;159(4):633–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lee SH, Park K, Kong DS, Kim ES, Eoh W. Long-term follow up of transoral anterior decompression and posterior fusion for irreducible bony compression of the craniovertebral junction. J Clin Neurosci. 2010;17:455–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Menezes AH, VanGilder JC. Transoral–transpharyngeal approach to the anterior craniocervical junction. Ten-year experience with 72 patients. J Neurosurg. 1988;69:895–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mullan S, Naunton R, Hekmat-Panah J, Vailati G. The use of an anterior approach to ventrally placed tumors in the foramen magnum and vertebral column. J Neurosurg. 1966;24:536–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Reisch R, Bettag M, Perneczky A. Transoral transclival removal of anteriorly placed cavernous malformations of the brainstem. Surg Neurol. 2001;56:106–15. Discussion 115-106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rhoton AL Jr. The posterior fossa cisterns. Neurosurgery. 2000;47:S287–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rhoton AL Jr, Tedeschi H. Lateral approaches to the cerebellopontine angle and petroclival region (honored guest lecture). Clin Neurosurg. 1994;41:517–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Saito I, Takahashi H, Joshita H, Usui M, Sasaki T, Sano K. Clipping of vertebro-basilar aneurysms by the transoral transclival approach. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 1980;20:753–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Saito K, Toda M, Tomita T, Ogawa K, Yoshida K. Surgical results of an endoscopic endonasal approach for clival chordomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012;154:879–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sekhar LN, Nanda A, Sen CN, Snyderman CN, Janecka IP. The extended frontal approach to tumors of the anterior, middle, and posterior skull base. J Neurosurg. 1992;76:198–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sen CN, Sekhar LN. An extreme lateral approach to intradural lesions of the cervical spine and foramen magnum. Neurosurgery. 1990;27:197–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Seoane E, Tedeschi H, de Oliveira E, Wen HT, Rhoton AL Jr. The pretemporal transcavernous approach to the interpeduncular and prepontine cisterns: microsurgical anatomy and technique application. Neurosurgery. 2000;46:891–8. Discussion 898-899.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Spetzler RF, Hadley MN, Sonntag VK. The transoral approach to the anterior superior cervical spine. A review of 29 cases. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien). 1988;43:69–74.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Stippler M, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Prevedello DM, Kassam AB. Endoscopic endonasal approach for clival chordomas. Neurosurgery. 2009;64:268–77. Discussion 277-268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Tedeschi H, Rhoton AL Jr. Lateral approaches to the petroclival region. Surg Neurol. 1994;41:180–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Uttley D, Moore A, Archer DJ. Surgical management of midline skull-base tumors: a new approach. J Neurosurg. 1989;71:705–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Visocchi M, Signorelli F, Liao C, Rigante M, Paludetti G, Barbagallo G, et al. Transoral versus transnasal approach for craniovertebral junction pathologies: never say never. World Neurosurg. 2018;110:592–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Welch WC, Kassam A. Endoscopically assisted transoral–transpharyngeal approach to the craniovertebral junction. Neurosurgery. 2003;52:1511–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wen HT, Rhoton AL Jr, Katsuta T, de Oliveira E. Microsurgical anatomy of the transcondylar, supracondylar, and paracondylar extensions of the far-lateral approach. J Neurosurg. 1997;87:555–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Yamamoto T, Yano S, Hide T, Kuratsu J. A case of ecchordosis physaliphora presenting with an abducens nerve palsy: a rare symptomatic case managed with endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery. Surg Neurol Int. 2013;4:13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oreste de Divitiis
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alfredo Conti
    • 2
  • Teresa Somma
    • 1
  • Flavio Angileri
    • 2
  • Paolo Cappabianca
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, School of Medicine and SurgeryFederico II University of NaplesNaplesItaly
  2. 2.Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences, and Morpho-functional ImagingUniversity of MessinaMessinaItaly

Personalised recommendations