Torture Laid Bare: Global English and Human Rights

  • Annabelle Mooney


The prohibition against torture is a well settled, absolute right in international law and human rights. As such, it presents an ideal case to understand what is at stake in human rights generally. The chapter considers the definitions of ‘torture’ contained in the UN Convention Against Torture and the Rome Statute, and then attempts to distill their essence into clear explanatory texts in Minimal English. This offers a way of thinking about the being at the heart of human rights: the human person.


  1. Association for the Prevention of Torture. 2008. Torture in International Law, a Guide to Jurisprudence, with Centre for Justice and Intentional Law. APT and CEJIL.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, C. 1997. Universal Human Rights: A Critique. International Journal of Human Rights 1 (1): 41–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burchard, Christoph. 2008. Torture in the Jurisprudence of the Ad Hoc Tribunals. Journal of International Criminal Justice 6: 159–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cobain, Ian. 2010. Cruel Britannia: A Secret History of Torture. London: Portobello Books.Google Scholar
  5. Cunniffe, Diarmuid. 2013. The Worst Scars Are in the Mind: Deconstructing Psychological Torture. ICL Journal: Vienna Journal of Constitutional Law 7: 1(13): 1–59 Accessed 9 Feb 2016.
  6. Dembour, M.-B. 2010. What Are Human Rights? Four Schools of Thought. Human Rights Quarterly 32 (1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Franck, Thomas M., and Peter Prows. 2005. The Role of Presumptions in International Tribunals. The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 4: 197–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grear, Anna. 2010. Redirecting Human Rights: Facing the Challenge of Corporate Legal Humanity. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harper, Julianne. 2009. Defining Torture: Bridging the Gap Between Rhetoric and Reality. Santa Clara Law Review 49: 893–928.Google Scholar
  10. Hathaway, Oona A., Aileen Nowlan, and Julia Spiegel. 2012. Tortured Reasoning: The Intent to Torture Under International and Domestic Law. Virginia Journal of International Law 52: 791–837.Google Scholar
  11. Ingelse, Chris. 2001. United Nations Committee Against Torture: An Assessment. The Hague: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Klayman, Barry M. 1978. The Definition of Torture in International Law. Temple Law Quarterly 51: 499–517.Google Scholar
  13. Lewis, Michael W. 2010. A Dark Descent into Reality: Making the Case for an Objective Definition of Torture. Washington and Lee Law Review 67: 77–136.Google Scholar
  14. Luban, David, and Henry Shue. 2011. Mental Torture: A Critique of Erasures in US Law. Georgetown Law Journal 100: 823–863.Google Scholar
  15. Miller, Gail. 2005. Defining Torture. Floersheimer Center for Constitutional Democracy, Occasional Paper 3. Available at Accessed 12 May 2015.
  16. Mooney, Annabelle. 2014. Human Rights and the Body. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  17. Nowak, Manfred. 2006. What Practices Constitute Torture?: The US and UN Standards. Human Rights Quarterly 28 (4): 809–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Parekh, S. 2007. Resisting “Dull and Torpid” Assent: Returning to the Debate Over the Foundations of Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly 29: 754–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rejali, Darius. 2009. Torture and Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rodley, N. 1997. Special Rapporteur on Torture, U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/1997/7, (Jan 10) at Accessed 12 May 2015.
  21. ———. 2002. The Definition(s) of Torture in International Law. Current Legal Problems 55 (1): 467–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Saif-Alden Wattad, Mohammed. 2008. The Torturing Debate on Torture. Northern Illinois Law Review 29: 1–49.Google Scholar
  23. Scarry, Elaine. 1985. The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Schechter, Rebecca. 2003. Intentional Starvation as Torture: Exploring the Gray Area Between Ill-Treatment and Torture. American University International Law Review 18: 1233–1270.Google Scholar
  25. Stanley, Elizabeth. 2005. Truth Commissions and the Recognition of State Crime. British Journal of Criminology 45 (4): 582–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stollznow, Karen. 2008. Dehumanisation in Language and Thought. Journal of Language and Politics 7 (2): 177–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tiersma, Peter. 2001. The Rocky Road to Legal Reform: Improving the Language of Jury Instructions. Brooklyn Law Review 66 (4): 1081–1119.Google Scholar
  28. Turner, Bryan S. 2006. Vulnerability and Human Rights. University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
  29. UN. 1966. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Accessed 8 May 2015.
  30. ———. 1984. Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Punishment or Treatment. Last Accessed 2 Oct 2015.
  31. Weissbrodt, David, and Cheryl Heilman. 2011. Defining Torture and Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment. Law and Inequality 29: 343.Google Scholar
  32. Wierzbicka, Anna. 1996. Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. ———. 2007. ‘Reasonable Man’ and ‘Reasonable Doubt’: The English Language, Anglo Culture and Anglo-American Law. International Journal of Speech Language and the Law 10 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. ———. 2014a. Imprisoned in English. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. ———. 2014b. “Pain” and “Suffering” in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. International Journal of Language and Culture 1 (2): 149–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wolcher, Louis. 2006. How Legal Language Works. Harvard Journal of Legislation 2: 91–125.Google Scholar
  37. Wordbanks Online. n.d. Collins Wordbanks Online. Accessed 12 June 2015.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Annabelle Mooney
    • 1
  1. 1.University of RoehamptonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations