Alternative Energy Sources and Energy Justice

Nuclear, Hydro and Wind
  • Darren McCauley


The imperative of climate change is driving significant investment in low-carbon technologies. Justice scholars need to be cognisant of emerging injustices that are inherent to alternative low-carbon energy sources. This chapter assesses the main justice implications for the three energy sources: nuclear, hydro and wind. It spans the range of low-carbon technologies from the leading large-scale options in the form of nuclear and hydro as well as the more modern micro-solutions in wind energy. It includes an examination of resource availability including production and security concerns, accessibility in relation to consumption patterns and trade flows as well as broader sustainability questions. The energy justice framework is then applied to each low-carbon source in a similar manner to the previous chapter.


Energy justice Hydropower Nuclear Wind Low carbon Sustainability 


  1. Ameye, E. 2015. United States and India: Two nuclear states with legislation that truly holds responsible parties liable in case of a nuclear accident. Journal of Risk Research 18: 1070–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Besley, J. 2010. Public engagement and the impact of fairness perceptions on decision favorability and acceptance. Science Communication 32: 256–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bickerstaff, K. 2012. “Because we’ve got history here”: Nuclear waste, cooperative siting, and the relational geography of a complex issue. Environment and Planning A 44: 2611–2628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BNEF. 2016. New energy outlook: Powering a changing world. London: BNEF. Google Scholar
  5. BP. 2016. Statistical review of world energy June 2016. London: BP.Google Scholar
  6. Bulkeley, H., G.A.S. Edwards, and S. Fuller. 2014. Contesting climate justice in the city: Examining politics and practice in urban climate change experiments. Global Environmental Change 25: 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Capaccioli A., G. Poderi, M. Bettega, et al. 2017. Exploring participatory energy budgeting as a policy instrument to foster energy justice. Energy Policy.Google Scholar
  8. Chatterton T.J., J. Barnes, J. Anable, et al. 2016. Mapping household direct energy consumption in the United Kingdom to provide a new perspective on energy justice. Energy Research and Social Science 18: 71–87.Google Scholar
  9. CNPC. 2016. World and China: Energy outlook 2050. Beijing: CNPC.Google Scholar
  10. Cowell, R., G. Bristow, and M. Munday. 2011. Acceptance, acceptability and environmental justice: The role of community benefits in wind energy development. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 54: 539–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Culley, M., and H. Angelique. 2011. Participation, power, and the role of community psychology in environmental disputes: A tale of two nuclear cities. American Journal of Community Psychology 47: 410–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Damgaard, C., D. McCauley, and J. Long. 2017. Assessing the energy justice implications of bioenergy development in Nepal. Energy, Sustainability and Society: In press.Google Scholar
  13. Day, R., G. Walker, and N. Simcock. 2016. Conceptualising energy use and energy poverty using a capabilities framework. Energy Policy 93: 255–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Emil Hess, C.E., and W.C. Ribeiro. 2016. Energy and environmental justice: Closing the gap. Environmental Justice 19394071 (9): 153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fan, M. 2006. Environmental justice and nuclear waste conflicts in Taiwan. Environmental Politics 15: 417–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Finley-Brook, M., and E. Holloman. 2016. Empowering energy justice. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 13: 926–945. Google Scholar
  17. Firestone, J., W. Kempton, M.B. Lilley, et al. 2012. Public acceptance of offshore wind power: Does perceived fairness of process matter? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 55: 1387–1402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Futter, A. 2015. The politics of nuclear weapons. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gowda, M., and D. Easterling. 2000. Voluntary siting and equity: The MRS facility experience in native America. Risk Analysis 20: 917–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. GP. 2015. Energy revoultion: A sustainable world energy outlook 2015. Germany: GP.Google Scholar
  21. Green, N., B. Sovacool, and K. Hancock. 2015. Grand designs: Assessing the African energy security implications of the Grand Inga Dam. African Studies Review 58: 133–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Habich, S. 2017. Reasons to Dam: China’s hydropower politics and its socio-environmental consequences. In Governance, domestic change & social policy in China, ed. K. Lin and J. Blanchard, 103–127. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  23. Hatch, M.T. 2015. Politics and nuclear power: Energy policy in Western Europe. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
  24. Heffron, R.J., and D. McCauley. 2014. Achieving sustainable supply chains through energy justice. Applied Energy 123: 435–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hensengerth, O. 2015. Global norms in domestic politics: Environmental norm contestation in Cambodia’s hydropower sector. Pacific Review 28: 505–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hiteva, R., and B. Sovacool. 2017. Harnessing social innovation for energy justice: A business model perspective. Energy Policy.Google Scholar
  27. Hommes, L., R. Boelens, and H. Maat. 2016. Contested hydrosocial territories and disputed water governance: Struggles and competing claims over the Ilisu Dam development in southeastern Turkey. Geoforum 71: 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. IAEA. 2016. Energy, electricity and nuclear power estimates for the period up to 2050. Paris: IAEA.Google Scholar
  29. IEA. 2015. Projected costs of generating electricity. Paris: IEA.Google Scholar
  30. IEA. 2016a. CO2 emissions from fuel combustion, 1–533. Paris: IEA.Google Scholar
  31. IEA. 2016b. Renewables information: Statistics and data. Paris: IEA.Google Scholar
  32. IEA. 2016c. Statistics on global electricity information. Paris: IEA.Google Scholar
  33. IEA. 2016d. World energy investment 2016. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  34. IEA. 2016e. World energy statistics 2016, 1–786. Paris: IEA.Google Scholar
  35. IEA. 2017. Technology roadmaps—Nuclear energy 2015. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  36. IRENA. 2016. Remap: A roadmap for a renewable energy future. Abu Dhabi: IRENA.Google Scholar
  37. Islar, M., S. Brogaard, and M. Lemberg-Pedersen. 2017. Feasibility of energy justice: Exploring national and local efforts for energy development in Nepal. Energy Policy 105: 668–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jenkins, K., R.J. Heffron, and D. McCauley. 2016a. The political economy of energy justice: A nuclear energy perspective. In Palgrave handbook of the international political economy of energy, ed. T. Van de Graaf, B. Sovacool, A. Ghosh, et al., 661. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jenkins, K., D. McCauley, R. Heffron, et al. 2016b. Energy justice: A conceptual review. Energy Research & Social Science 11: 174–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Johnston, A., R.J. Heffron, and D. McCauley. 2014. Rethinking the scope and necessity of energy subsidies in the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science 3: 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jones, C., B. Orr, and J. Eiser. 2011. When is enough, enough? Identifying predictors of capacity estimates for onshore wind-power development in a region of the UK. Energy Policy 39: 4563–4577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Karlsson, R. 2012. Carbon lock-in, rebound effects and China at the limits of statism. Energy Policy 51: 939–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kayir, Ö. 2017. Violations of water rights, socio-ecological destruction and injustice in Turkey By hydro-electric power plants. Transactions on Ecology and the Environment 200: 147–158.Google Scholar
  44. Kerselaers, E., E. Rogge, E. Vanempten, et al. 2013. Changing land use in the countryside: Stakeholders’ perception of the ongoing rural planning processes in Flanders. Land Use Policy 32: 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Khan, T. 2012. “Dam” the Irony for the greater common good: A critical cultural analysis of the Narmada dam debate. International Journal of Communication 6: 194–212.Google Scholar
  46. Kyne, D. 2016. Living with the invisible risks in the U.S. urban areas: Potential nuclear power-induced disasters, urban emergency management challenges, and environmental justice issues. Risk Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy 7: 176–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Langer, K., T. Decker, J. Roosen, et al. 2016. A qualitative analysis to understand the acceptance of wind energy in Bavaria. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 64: 248–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Liljenfeldt, J., and Ö. Pettersson. 2017. Distributional justice in Swedish wind power development—An odds ratio analysis of windmill localization and local residents’ socio-economic characteristics. Energy Policy 105: 648–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Marques, S., M. Lima, S. Moreira, et al. 2015. Local identity as an amplifier: Procedural justice, local identity and attitudes towards new dam projects. Journal of Environmental Psychology 44: 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McCauley, D. 2015. Sustainable development in energy policy: A governance assessment of environmental stakeholder inclusion in waste-to-energy. Sustainable Development 23: 273–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mirumachi, N., and J. Torriti. 2012. The use of public participation and economic appraisal for public involvement in large-scale hydropower projects: Case study of the Nam Theun 2 hydropower project. Energy Policy 47: 125–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Moss, J. 2015. Climate change and justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Munro, P., G. van der Horst, and S. Healy. 2017. Energy justice for all? Rethinking sustainable development goal 7 through struggles over traditional energy practices in Sierra Leone. Energy Policy 105: 635–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Otsuki, K. 2016. Procedural equity and corporeality: Imagining a just recovery in Fukushima. Journal of Rural Studies 47: 300–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pepermans, Y., and I. Loots. 2013. Wind farm struggles in Flanders fields: A sociological perspective. Energy Policy 59: 321–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schlor, H., W. Fischer, and J. Hake. 2013. Sustainable development, justice and the Atkinson index: Measuring the distributional effects of the German energy transition. Applied Energy 112: 1493–1499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Scudder, T. 2008. Hydropower corruption and the politics of resettlement. In Global Corruption Report, 1–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  58. Simcock, N. 2016. Procedural justice and the implementation of community wind energy projects: A case study from South Yorkshire, UK. Land Use Policy 59: 467–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sneddon, C., and C. Fox. 2008. Struggles over dams as struggles for justice: The World Commission on Dams (WCD) and anti-dam campaigns in Thailand and Mozambique. Society & Natural Resources 21: 625–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sovacool, B.K. 2017. Reviewing, reforming, and rethinking global energy subsidies: Towards a political economy research agenda. Ecological Economics 135: 150–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sovacool, B., and J. Scarpaci. 2016. Energy justice and the contested petroleum politics of stranded assets: Policy insights from the Yasuni-ITT initiative in Ecuador. Energy Policy 95: 158–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sovacool, B.K., and S.V. Valentine. 2012. The national politics of nuclear power: Economics, security, and governance. Abingdon, OX: Routledge.Google Scholar
  63. Stern, P.C., B.K. Sovacool, and T. Dietz. 2016. Towards a science of climate and energy choices. Nature Climate Change 6: 547–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Szarka, J. 2012. Learning from wind power: Governance, societal and policy perspectives on sustainable energy [Electronic book]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  65. Taebi, B., S. Roeser, and I. van de Poet. 2012. The ethics of nuclear power: Social experiments, intergenerational justice, and emotions. Energy Policy 51: 202–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Upham, P., and J.G. Perez. 2015. A cognitive mapping approach to understanding public objection to energy infrastructure: The case of wind power in Galicia, Spain. Renewable Energy 83: 587–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Walker, B.J.A., D. Russel, and T. Kurz. 2017. Community benefits or community bribes? An experimental analysis of strategies for managing community perceptions of bribery surrounding the siting of renewable energy projects. Environment and Behavior 49: 59–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. WEC. 2016a. World energy perspectives: Energy efficiency policies. London: WEC.Google Scholar
  69. WEC. 2016b. World energy resources full report 2016. London: WEC.Google Scholar
  70. WEC. 2016c. World energy scenarios: The grand transition. London: WEC.Google Scholar
  71. WEC. 2017a. Hydropower in global perspective. London: WEC.Google Scholar
  72. WEC. 2017b. Wind energy capacity and production. London: WEC.Google Scholar
  73. Xu, Y.-C., and C. Palgrave. 2010. The politics of nuclear energy in China. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  74. Young, I.M. 2004. Responsibility and global labor justice. Journal of Political Philosophy 12: 365–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Young, I.M. 2006. Responsibility and global justice: A social connection model. Social Philosophy & Policy 23: 102–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Young, I.M. 2008. Responsibility and global justice: A social connection model. In Handbook of research on global corporate citizenship, 137–165. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  77. Young, I.M. 2010. Responsibility and global labor justice. In Responsibility in context: Perspectives, 53–76. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  78. Young, I.M. 2011. Responsibility for justice. Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of St. AndrewsSt. AndrewsUK

Personalised recommendations