Advertisement

The Dark Side of Entrepreneurship in Coworking-Spaces

  • Ricarda B. BounckenEmail author
  • Mahmood M. Aslam
  • Andreas J. Reuschl
Chapter
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)

Abstract

Entrepreneurs act as an economic engine by creating new businesses and new jobs, intensifying competition and enhancing productivity through creative and novel methods of production and service delivery. Entrepreneurs are characterized as unique personalities with the ability to innovate, start firms, create value, profitability and growth. Coworking-spaces provide a creative and innovative atmosphere to entrepreneurs and working space to run their business operations while interacting and collaborating with other entrepreneurs. However, the professional and social dynamics in coworking-spaces bear the risk of stress, exploitation, conflicts and distrust, which negatively affect entrepreneurial self-efficacy and passion, undermining the advantages of coworking-spaces and leading to withdrawal of entrepreneurs. We argue that coworking-spaces can support entrepreneurs in facing these challenges by developing entrepreneurial communities, providing mentoring, coaching and social support to nascent entrepreneurs.

Keywords

Entrepreneurial passion Stress Communities Coworking-spaces 

References

  1. Aldrich, H. E., & Wiedenmayer, G. (1993). From traits to rats: An ecological perspective on organizational foundings. Advances in Entrepreneurshp, Firm Emergence, and Growth, 1(3), 145–196.Google Scholar
  2. Baron, R. A., Franklin, R. J., & Hmieleski, K. M. (2016). Why entrepreneurs often experience low, not high, levels of stress: The joint effects of selection and psychological capital. Journal of Management, 42(3), 742–768. doi: 10.1177/0149206313495411 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beaver, G., & Jennings, P. (2005). Competitive advantage and entrepreneurial power: The dark side of entrepreneurship. Small Business and Enterprise Development, 12(1), 9–23. doi: 10.1108/14626000510579617 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bilandzic, M., Schroeter, R., & Foth, M. (2013). Gelatine: Making coworking places gel for better collaboration and social learning. In 25th australian computer-human interaction conference on augmentation, application, innovation, collaboration (pp. 427–436). New York, USA: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2541016.2541027 Google Scholar
  5. Bolino, M. C., Turnley, W. H., & Bloodgood, J. M. (2002). Citizenship behavior and the creation of social capital in organization. Academy of Management Journal, 27(4), 505–522.Google Scholar
  6. Bouncken, R. B. (2017). University coworking-spaces: Mechanisms, examples, and suggestions for entrepreneurial universities. International Journal of Technology Management. Google Scholar
  7. Bouncken, R. B., & Reuschl, A. J. (2016). Coworking-spaces: How a phenomenon of the sharing economy builds a novel trend for the workplace and for entrepreneurship. Review of Managerial Science, 1–18. doi: 10.1007/s11846-016-0215-y
  8. Bouncken, R. B., Reuschl, A. J. (2017). Coworking-spaces: Chancen für Entrepreneurship und business model design. Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship. doi:(forthcoming).Google Scholar
  9. Bouncken, R. B., Clauß, T., Reuschl, A. J. (2016). Coworking-spaces in Asia: A business model design perspective. In: SMS. Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  10. Boyd, N. G., & Vozikis, G. S. (1994). The influence of self-efficacy on the development of entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(4), 63–77. doi: 10.1080/02640410152475847 Google Scholar
  11. Butcher, T. (2013). Coworking: Locating community at work. In: Proceedings of the 27th annual australia new zealand academy of management (ANZAM) conference (pp. 1–13).Google Scholar
  12. Cabral, V., Winden, W. V. (2016). Coworking: An analysis of coworking strategies for interaction and innovation. In: Regional studies association annual conference, Graz, Austria. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.4404.5208
  13. Capdevila, I. (2013). Knowledge dynamics in localized communities: Coworking spaces as microclusters. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–18. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2414121
  14. Capdevila, I. (2014a). Different inter-organizational collaboration approaches in coworking spaces in Barcelona. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–30. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2502816
  15. Capdevila, I. (2014b). Coworking spaces and the localized dynamics of innovation. The case of Barcelona. SSRN Electronic Journal, 19(3), 1–25. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2502813 Google Scholar
  16. Carmeli, A. (2005). The relationship between organizational culture and withdrawal intentions and behavior. International Journal of Manpower, 26(2), 177–195. doi: 10.1108/01437720510597667 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Choen, A. M. (2011). Four scenarios for co-working. Futurist, 45(4), 8–10.Google Scholar
  18. Chowdhury, S. (2005). Demographic diversity for building an effective entrepreneurial team: Is it important? Journal of Business Venturing, 20(6), 727–746. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cohen, E. (2016). The dark side of co-working spaces. Medium Corporation. Accessed February 1, 2016, from https://medium.com/@thesocialfairy/the-dark-side-of-co-working-spaces-d6bf46a655b8#.8b6mrnm8e
  20. Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Collewaert, V. (2012). Angel investors’ and entrepreneurs’ intentions to exit their ventures: A conflict perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(4), 753–779. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00456.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Collewaert, V., & Sapienza, H. J. (2016). How does angel investor-entrepreneur conflict affect venture innovation? It depends. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(3), 573–597. doi: 10.1111/etap.12131 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. De Clercq, D., Dimov, D., & Belausteguigoitia, I. (2016). Perceptions of adverse work conditions and innovative behavior: The buffering roles of relational resources. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(3), 515–542. doi: 10.1111/etap.12121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. De Varies, K. (1985). The dark side of entrepreneurship. Harvard Business Review, 85(6), 160–182. doi: 10.1038/nm1095-1002
  25. De Vries, K. (2003). The entrepreneur on the couch. Insead Quarterly, 5, 17–19.Google Scholar
  26. Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Review Literature and Arts of the Americas, 2(1), 335–362.Google Scholar
  27. Ensley, M. D., Pearson, A. W., & Amason, A. C. (2002). Understanding the dynamics of new venture top management teams: Cohesion, conflict, and new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(4), 365–386. doi: 10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00065-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Foertsch, C. (2015). First results of the new global coworking survey. Deskmag. Accessed June 28, 2016, from http://www.deskmag.com/en/first-results-of-the-new-global-coworking-survey-2015-16
  29. Fuzi, A. (2015). Co-working spaces for promoting entrepreneurship in sparse regions: The case of South Wales. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2(1), 462–469. doi: 10.1080/21681376.2015.1072053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gandini, A. (2015). The rise of coworking spaces: A literature review. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organizations, 15(1), 193–205.Google Scholar
  31. Gerdenitsch, C., Scheel, T. E., Andorfer, J., & Korunka, C. (2016). Coworking spaces: A source of social support for independent professionals. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(1), 1–12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00581 Google Scholar
  32. Green, R. (2014). Collaborate or compete: How do landlords respond to the rise in coworking? Cornell Real Estate Review, 12, 52–59.Google Scholar
  33. Higashide, H., & Birley, S. (2002). The consequences of conflict between the venture capitalist and the entrepreneurial team in the United Kingdom from the perspective of the venture capitalist. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(1), 59–81. doi: 10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00057-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kim, P. H., & Aldrich, H. E. (2005). Social capital and entrepreneurship. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 1(2), 55–104. doi: 10.1561/0300000002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Larson, A. (1992). Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(1), 76–104. doi: 10.2307/2393534 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lechler, T. (2001). Social interaction: A determinant of entrepreneurial team venture success. Small Business Economics, 16(4), 263–278. doi: 10.1023/A:1011167519304 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Letaifa, S. B., & Rabeau, Y. (2013). Too close to collaborate? How geographic proximity could impede entrepreneurship and innovation. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 2071–2078. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lin, N. (1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22(1), 28–51. doi: 10.1108/14691930410550381 Google Scholar
  40. McKenna, S. D. (1996). The darker side of the entrepreneur. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 17(17), 41–45. doi: 10.1108/01437739610130519 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Morck, R., & Yeung, B. (2003). Agency problems in large family business groups. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 367–382. doi: 10.1111/1540-8520.t01-1-00015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Morck, R., & Yeung, B. (2004). Family control and the rent-seeking society. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 391–409. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00053.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Moriset, B. (2014). Building new places of the creative economy the rise of coworking spaces. In: 2nd Geography of Innovation International Conference 2014 (pp. 1–24). Utrecht (The Netherlands).Google Scholar
  44. Obschonka, M., Andersson, H., Silbereisen, R. K., & Sverke, M. (2013). Rule-breaking, crime, and entrepreneurship: A replication and extension study with 37-year longitudinal data. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(3), 386–396. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2013.06.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Obstfeld, D. (2005). Social networks, the tertius lungens orientation , and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 100–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Osborne, R. L. (1991). The dark side of the entrepreneur. Long Range Planning, 24(3), 26–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pohler, N. (2012). Getting rid of coworker exploitation, Deskmag. Accessed February 1, 2016, from http://www.deskmag.com/en/getting-rid-of-coworker-exploitation-198
  48. Reuschl, A. J., & Bouncken, R. B. (2017). Coworking-spaces als neue organisationsform in der sharing economy. In: Dienstleistungen 4.0. Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
  49. Ricketts, M. (2009). Theories of entrepreneurship: Historical development and critical assessment. In: The oxford handbook of entrepreneurship. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199546992.003.0002
  50. Ross, P., & Ressia, S. (2015). Neither office nor home: Coworking as an emerging workplace choice. Employment Relations Record, 15(1), 42–57.Google Scholar
  51. Ruef, M., Aldrich, H. E., & Carter, N. M. (2003). The structure of founding teams: Homophily, strong ties, and isolation among U.S. entrepreneurs. American Sociological Review, 68(2), 195–222. doi: 10.2307/1519766 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rus, A., & Orel, M. (2015). Coworking: A community of work. Teorija in Praksa, 52(6), 1017–1038.Google Scholar
  53. Spinuzzi, C. (2012). Working alone, together: Coworking as emergent collaborative activity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(4), 399–441. doi: 10.1177/1050651912444070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Surman, T. (2013). Building social entrepreneurship through the power of coworking. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 8(3–4), 189–195. doi: 10.1162/INOV_a_00195 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Uda, T. (2013). What is coworking? A theoretical study on the concept of coworking. Discussion Paper, Series A, 265, 1–15. http://eprints.lib.hokudai.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/2115/53982/1/DPA265.pdf
  56. Uda, T., Sukanya, R., Nirmala, J., Smith, S., Thorne, C. H., Beasley, R. W., et al. (2015). A theoretical study on the concept of coworking. International Journal of Research in Management, 3(1), 1–12. doi: 10.4172/2167-0234.1000136 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Waters-Lynch, J., Potts, J., Butcher, T., Dodson, J., & Hurley, J. (2016). Coworking: A transdisciplinary overview. SSRN ELECTRONIC Journal, 1–58. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2712217
  58. Wellman, B., & Frank, K. A. (2001). Network capital in a multi-level world: Getting support from a personal communities. In N. Lin, K. S. Cook, & R. S. Burt (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 233–273). Chicago: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  59. Wright, M., & Zahra, S. (2011). The other side of paradise: Examining the dark side of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 1(3), 1–5. doi: 10.2202/2157-5665.1043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ricarda B. Bouncken
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mahmood M. Aslam
    • 1
  • Andreas J. Reuschl
    • 1
  1. 1.University of BayreuthBayreuthGermany

Personalised recommendations