Advertisement

A Low-Cost Solution for the Monitoring of Air Pollution Parameters Through Bicycles

  • Irene AicardiEmail author
  • Filippo Gandino
  • Nives Grasso
  • Andrea Maria Lingua
  • Francesca Noardo
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10407)

Abstract

The monitoring of air quality parameters is a fundamental requirement for smart cities development and it is of primary importance for the quality of human life. In fact, the knowledge of air quality parameters along the days and in different areas of the city is essential to monitor its behavior and to take some preventive measurements to limit the concentration. Especially in big cities, it is very hard to have widespread updated data about pollutants and air quality parameters since normally only few air quality monitoring stations are available. In Piedmont (Italy), the reference public body for this kind of information is the ARPA (Regional Agency for the Protection of the Environment) which is responsible for the collection and the disclosure of environmental data. However, the number of monitoring stations along the city is limited and they have fixed positions. A solution through mobile sensors would be preferable to have a more comprehensive description of the phenomenon. In this paper, the authors describe the implementation of a new solution based on a mobile system to house environmental air quality and imaging sensors (since also the knowledge of the shape of the environment is a fundamental aspect). In particular, a bicycle is adopted and the paper describes all the analyses involved in the choice of the more appropriate sensors and their evaluation and behavior in a real environment. Finally, the collection and management of the acquired data is analyzed through the implementation of a dedicated GIS (Geographical Information System).

Keywords

Environmental monitoring Low-cost sensors Pollution Semantic data management Dynamic scenes 

References

  1. 1.
    Anastasi, G., Bruschi, P., Marcelloni, F.: ‘U-Sense’, a cooperative sensing system for monitoring air quality in urban areas. In: Smart Cities, vol. 34 (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arco, E., Boccardo, P., Gandino, F., Lingua, A., Noardo, F., Rebaudengo, M.: An integrated approach for pollution monitoring: smart acquirement and smart information. In: 1st International Conference on Smart Data and Smart Cities, 30th UDMS, Split (Croatia), 7–9 September 2016, pp. 67–74 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bates, D.V., Bell, G.M., Burnham, C.D., Hazucha, M., Mantha, J., Pengelly, L.D., Silverman, F.: Short-term effects of ozone on the lung. J. Appl. Physiol. 32(2), 176–181 (1972)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dutta, P., Aoki, P.M., Kumar, N., Mainwaring, A., Myers, C., Willett, W., Woodruff, A.: Common sense: participatory urban sensing using a network of handheld air quality monitors. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pp. 349–350 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eisenman, S.B., Miluzzo, E., Lane, N.D., Peterson, R.A., Ahn, G.S., Campbell, A.T.: BikeNet: a mobile sensing system for cyclist experience mapping. ACM Trans. Sensor Netw. (TOSN) 6(1) (2009). Article 6Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fann, N., Lamson, A.D., Anenberg, S.C., Wesson, K., Risley, D., Hubbell, B.J.: Estimating the national public health burden associated with exposure to ambient PM2.5 and ozone. Risk Anal. 32(1), 81–95 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hasenfratz, D., Saukh, O., Sturzenegger, S., Thiele, L.: Participatory air pollution monitoring using smartphones. In: Mobile Sensing (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hasenfratz, D., Saukh, O., Walser, C., Hueglin, C., Fierz, M., Arn, T., Beutel, J., Thiele, L.: Deriving high-resolution urban air pollution maps using mobile sensor nodes. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 16, 268–285 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kheirbek, I., Wheeler, K., Walters, S., Kass, D., Matte, T.: PM2.5 and ozone health impacts and disparities in New York City: sensitivity to spatial and temporal resolution. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 6(2), 473–486 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Khedo, K.K., Perseedoss, R., Mungur, A.: A wireless sensor network air pollution monitoring system. Int. J. Wirel. Mob. Netw. 2(2), 31–45 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lippmann, M.: Health effects of ozone a critical review. Japca 39(5), 672–695 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ma, Y., Richards, M., Ghanem, M., Guo, Y., Hassard, J.: Air pollution monitoring and mining based on sensor grid in London. Sensors 8(6), 3601–3623 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mansour, S., Nasser, N., Karim, L., Ali, A.: Wireless sensor network-based air quality monitoring system. In: 2014 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC), pp. 545–550. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Piras, M., Dabove, P.: Comparison of two different mass-market IMU generations: bias analyses and real time applications. In: Position, Location and Navigation Symposium (PLANS), 2016 IEEE/ION, pp. 34–41. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pope III, C.A., Dockery, D.W.: Acute health effects of PM10 pollution on symptomatic and asymptomatic children. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 145(5), 1123–1128 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Postolache, O., Pereira, M., Girao, P.M.B.S.: Smart sensor network for air quality monitoring applications. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, IMTC 2005, vol. 1, pp. 537–542. IEEE (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Prandi, F., De Amicis, R., Piffer, S., Soavea, M., Cadzowb, S., Boix, E.G., D’Hondt, E.: Using CityGML to deploy smart-city services for urban ecosystems. In: International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. 4 (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Soave, M., Devigili, F., Prandi, F., de Amicis, R.: Visualization and analysis of CityGML dataset within a client sever infrastructure. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on 3D Web Technology, pp. 215–215 (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Spektor, D.M., Lippmann, M., Lioy, P.J., Thurston, G.D., Citak, K., James, D.J., Hayes, C.: Effects of ambient ozone on respiratory function in active, normal children. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 137(2), 313–320 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tsujita, W., Ishida, H., Moriizumi, T.: Dynamic gas sensor network for air pollution monitoring and its auto-calibration. In: Proceedings of IEEE Sensors, pp. 56–59. IEEE (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Velasco, A., Ferrero, R., Gandino, F., Montrucchio, B., Rebaudengo, M.: On the design of distributed air quality monitoring systems. In: 11th International Conference of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering (ICCMSE 2015), Athens (Greece) (2015)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang, Z.: A flexible new technique for camera calibration. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 22(11), 1330–1334 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DIATIPolitecnico di TorinoTurinItaly
  2. 2.DAUIN - Department of Control and Computer EngineeringPolitecnico di TorinoTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations