Parallel Ray Tracing for Underwater Acoustic Predictions

  • Rogério M. Calazan
  • Orlando C. Rodríguez
  • Nadia Nedjah
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10404)

Abstract

Different applications of underwater acoustics frequently rely on the calculation of transmissions loss (TL), which is obtained from predictions of acoustic pressure provided by an underwater acoustic model. Such predictions are computationally intensive when dealing with three-dimensional environments. Parallel processing can be used to mitigate the computational burden and improve the performance of calculations, by splitting the computational workload into several tasks, which can be allocated on multiple processors to run concurrently. This paper addresses an Open MPI based parallel implementation of a three-dimensional ray tracing model for predictions of acoustic pressure. Data from a tank scale experiment, providing waveguide parameters and TL measurements, are used to test the accuracy of the ray model and the performance of the proposed parallel implementation. The corresponding speedup and efficiency are also discussed. In order to provide a complete reference runtimes and TL predictions from two additional underwater acoustic models are also considered.

Keywords

Parallel computing Open MPI Underwater acoustics Ray tracing 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work received support from the Foreign Courses Program of CNPq and the Brazilian Navy. Thanks are due to the SiPLAB research team, LARSyS, FCT, University of Algarve. The authors are also deeply thankful to LMA-CNRS for allowing the use of the experimental tank data discussed in this work.

References

  1. 1.
    Tolstoy, A.: 3-D propagation issues and models. J. Comput. Acoust. 4(03), 243–271 (1996)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jensen, F.B., Kuperman, W.A., Porter, M.B., Schmidt, H.: Computational Ocean Acoustics, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (2011)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sturm, F., Korakas, A.: Comparisons of laboratory scale measurements of three-dimensional acoustic propagation with solutions by a parabolic equation model. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 133(1), 108–118 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hodges, R.P.: Underwater Acoustics: Analysis, Design and Performance of Sonar. Wiley, Hoboken (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Soares, C., Zabel, F., Jesus, S.M.: A shipping noise prediction tool. In: OCEANS 2015, Genova (2015). doi: 10.1109/OCEANS-Genova.2015.7271539
  6. 6.
    Felisberto, P., Rodriguez, O., Santos, P., Ey, E., Jesus, S.: Experimental results of underwater cooperative source localization using a single acoustic vector sensor. Sensors 13(7), 8856–8878 (2013). doi: 10.3390/s130708856 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Open MPI: Open Source High Performance Computing, January 2017. http://www.open-mpi.org/
  8. 8.
    Castor, K., Sturm, F.: Investigation of 3D acoustical effects using a multiprocessing parabolic equation based algorithm. J. Comput. Acoust. 16(02), 137–162 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hursky, P., Porter, M.B.: Accelerating underwater acoustic propagation modeling using general purpose graphic processing units. In: OCEANS 2011 MTS/IEEE KONA, pp. 1–6 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Xing, C.X., Song, Y., Zhang, W., Meng, Q.X., Piao, S.C.: Parallel computing method of seeking 3D eigen-rays with an irregular seabed. In: 2013 IEEE/OES Acoustics in Underwater Geosciences Symposium, pp. 1–5 (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rodríguez, O.C.: The TRACEO ray tracing program. SiPLAB, University of Algarve (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rodríguez, O.C., Collis, J.M., Simpson, H.J., Ey, E., Schneiderwind, J., Felisberto, P.: Seismo-acoustic ray model benchmarking against experimental tank data. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 132(2), 709–717 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4734236 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Patterson, D.A., Hennessy, J.L.: Computer Organization and Design: The Hardware/Software Interface. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (2013)MATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    MPI Forum: Message Passing Interface (MPI) Forum Home Page, January 2017. http://www.mpi-forum.org/
  15. 15.
    Korakas, A., Sturm, F., Sessarego, J.P., Ferrand, D.: Scaled model experiment of long-range across-slope pulse propagation in a penetrable wedge. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126(1), EL22–EL27 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Grama, A., Karypis, G., Kumar, V., Gupta, A.: Introduction to Parallel Computing, 2nd edn. Addison Wesley, Boston (2003)MATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Porter, M.B.: Out-of-plane effects in ocean acoustics. Technical report, DTIC Document (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Porter, M.B.: Gaussian beam tracing for computing ocean acoustic fields. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82(4), 1349 (1987). http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.395269 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Porter, M.B.: A numerical method for ocean-acoustic normal modes. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 76(1), 244 (1984). http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.391101 CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kuperman, W.A.: Rapid computation of acoustic fields in three-dimensional ocean environments. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89(1), 125 (1991). http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.400518 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    HLS Research: Ocean acoustics library, January 2017. http://oalib.hlsresearch.com/

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LARSySUniversity of AlgarveFaroPortugal
  2. 2.Department of Electronics Engineering and Telecommunications, Faculty of EngineeringState University of Rio de JaneiroRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations