Advertisement

Studying Complex Care Transitions from a Quantitative Perspective

  • Line K. Bragstad
  • Christina Foss
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, Bragstad and Foss highlight key methodological challenges and lessons learned when studying complex care transitions from a quantitative perspective. Key challenges with regard to designing and planning the study, developing survey instruments and conducting survey research on transitional care is emphasized. The research examples used throughout this chapter are predominantly linked to a study exploring older patients’ and their next of kin’s experiences with transition from hospital to municipal care. The methodological challenges are, however, applicable to a wider context.

References

  1. Abma, T. A., Nierse, C. J., & Widdershoven, G. A. M. (2009). Patients as partners in responsive research: Methodological notions for collaborations in mixed research teams. Qualitative Health Research, 19(3), 401–415.Google Scholar
  2. Bragstad, L. K. (2015). Indispensable intermediaries: The role of informal caregivers in the discharge process of older relatives. Oslo: Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine/University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  3. Bragstad, L. K., Kirkevold, M., Hofoss, D., & Foss, C. (2012). Factors predicting a successful post-discharge outcome for individuals aged 80 years and over. International Journal of Integrated Care, 12, e147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bragstad, L. K., Kirkevold, M., Hofoss, D., & Foss, C. (2014). Informal caregivers’ participation when older adults in Norway are discharged from the hospital. Health & Social Care in the Community, 22, 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coleman, E. A. (2003). Falling through the cracks: Challenges and opportunities for improving transitional care for persons with continuous complex care needs. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 51, 549–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Foss, C. (2011). Elders and patient participation revisited – A discourse analytic approach to older persons’ reflections on patient participation. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20, 2014–2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Foss, C., & Askautrud, M. (2010). Measuring the participation of elderly patients in the discharge process from hospital: A critical review of existing instruments. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 24, 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Foss, C., & Hofoss, D. (2011). Elderly persons’ experiences of participation in hospital discharge process. Patient Education and Counseling, 85, 68–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hellevik, O. (2002). Forskningsmetode i sosiologi og statsvitenskap [research methods in sociology and political science]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  10. Kearney, M. H. (2016a). Under-appreciated steps in instrument development, part I: Starting with validity. Research in Nursing & Health, 39, 81–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kearney, M. H. (2016b). Under-appreciated steps in instrument development, part II: Ending with validity. Research in Nursing & Health, 39, 135–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Knapp, P., & Hewison, J. (1999). Disagreement in patient and carer assessment of functional abilities after stroke. Stroke, 30, 934–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing research : Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
  14. Thompson, A. G. (2007). The meaning of patient involvement and participation in health care consultations: A taxonomy. Social Science & Medicine, 64, 1297–1310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Line K. Bragstad
    • 1
  • Christina Foss
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Health and SocietyUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations