Advertisement

Studying Complex Care Transitions from a Qualitative Perspective

  • Kristin A. Laugaland
  • Dagrunn N. Dyrstad
  • Karina Aase
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, Laugaland et al. present key methodological challenges and lessons learned when studying complex care transitions from a qualitative perspective. Although these challenges are common to many other research designs, they are especially important to consider for researchers in the design and conduct of qualitative research studies aiming to developing in-depth descriptive and analytical understandings of care transitions. The challenges described in this chapter are structured according to recruitment and retention of the elderly and issues concerning data collection.

References

  1. Aase, K., Laugaland, A. K., Dyrstad, N. D., & Storm, M. (2013). Quality and safety in transitional care of the elderly: The study protocol of a case study research design (phase 1). BMJ Open, 3, e003506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abraham, J., Kannampallil, G. T., & Patel, L. V. (2012). Bridging gaps in handoffs: A continuity based approach. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 45, 240–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. DeWalt, K. M., & DeWalt, B. R. (2011). Participant observation: A guide for fieldworkers. United Kingdom: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  4. Dyrstad, D. N., Testad, I., Aase, K., & Storm, M. (2015). A review of the literature on patient participation in transtitions of the elderly. Cognition, Technology & Work, 17, 15–34.Google Scholar
  5. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Laugaland, K., & Aase, K. (2015). The demands imposed by a health care reform on clinical work in transitional care of the elderly: A multi-faceted Janus. In R. Wears, E. Hollnagel, & J. Braithwaite (Eds.), Resilience in everyday clinical work. United Kingdom: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  7. Laugaland, K., Aase, K., & Barach, P. (2011). Addressing risk factors for transitional care of the elderly – Literature review. In S. Albolini, S. Bagnare, T. Bellani, J. Llaneza, G. Rosal, & R. Tartaglia (Eds.), Healthcare systems ergonomics and patient safety 2011 – An alliance between professionals and citizens for patient safety and quality of life. London: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group. isbn:978-0-415-68413-2.Google Scholar
  8. Laugaland, K., Aase, K., & Barach, P. (2012). Interventions to improve patient safety in transitional care – A review of the evidence. Work, a Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation, 41(Supplement 1), 2915–2924.Google Scholar
  9. McMurdo, M. E. T., Roberts, H., Parker, S., et al. (2011). Improving recruitment of the elderly to research through good practice. Age and Aging, 40, 659–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mintzberg, H. (1971). Managerial work: Analysis from observation. Management Science, 18(2), 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Provencher, V., Mortensen, B. W., Tanguay-Garneau, L., et al. (2014). Challenges and strategies pertaining to recruitment and retention of frail elderly in research studies: A systematic review. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 59, 19–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ridda, I., MacIntyre, C. R., Lindley, R. I., & Tan, T. C. (2010). Difficulties in recruiting older people in clinical trials: An examination of barriers and solutions. Vaccine, 28, 901–906.Google Scholar
  13. Snyder, N., & Glueck, F. W. (1980). How managers plan – The analysis of managers’ activities. Long Range Planning, 13, 70–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Walsh, A. S. (2009). Conducting research with the elderly: Ethical concerns for vulnerable population. Southern Online Journal of Nursing Research, 9(4)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristin A. Laugaland
    • 1
  • Dagrunn N. Dyrstad
    • 1
  • Karina Aase
    • 1
  1. 1.University of StavangerStavangerNorway

Personalised recommendations