Advertisement

Is Homo naledi Going to Challenge Our Presuppositions on Human Uniqueness?

  • Rubén HerceEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Issues in Science and Religion: Publications of the European Society for the Study of Science and Theology book series (ESSSAT, volume 4)

Abstract

In 2013 the Dinaledi Chamber in South Africa was discovered. Within this chamber, one of the largest collections from a single hominin species has been found. The remains, similar to human-like populations with small bodies, led to an announcement that a new species had been found. In 2015 an international team, led by Lee Berger, formally described Homo naledi. However, the fossils have not been dated yet and, as a result, a question arises as to whether the bones may represent a population at the dawn of humanity or a population that may have evolved in near isolation. Aside from this stimulating problem there are some reasons to think that the remains may have been deliberately placed in the cave. Berger speculates that these individuals were capable of ritual behaviour and that the placing of dead bodies was a ritualistic behaviour, a sign of symbolic thought. In this paper I discuss the data and explore if H. naledi’s fossils might challenge our presuppositions on human uniqueness.

Keywords

Action strategy Complex behaviour Consciousness Dinaledi chamber Homo genus Homo naledi Human origins Human uniqueness Rising Star cave system Ritual behaviour 

Bibliography

  1. Antón, S. C., Potts, R., & Aiello, L. C. (2014). Human evolution. Evolution of early Homo: An integrated biological perspective. Science, 345, 1236828. doi: 10.1126/science.1236828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berger, L. R., Hawks, J., De Ruiter, D. J., Churchill, S. E., Schmid, P., Delezene, L. K., Kivell, T. L., Garvin, H. M., Williams, S. A., Desilva, J. M., Skinner, M. M., Musiba, C. M., Cameron, N., Holliday, T. W., Harcourt - Smith, W., Ackermann, R. R., Bastir, M., Bogin, B., Bolter, D., Brophy, J., Cofran, Z. D., Congdon, K. A., Deane, A. S., Dembo, M., Drapeau, M., Elliott, M. C., Feuerriegel, E. M., Garcia - Martinez, D., Green, D. J., Gurtov, A., Irish, J. D., Kruger, A., Laird, M. F., Marchi, D., Meyer, M. R., Nalla, S., Negash, E. W., Orr, C. M., Radovcic, D., Schroeder, L., Scott, J. E., Throckmorton, Z., Tocheri, M. W., Vansickle, C., Walker, C. S., Wei, P., & Zipfel, B. (2015). Homo naledi, a new species of the genus Homo from the Dinaledi Chamber, South Africa. eLife, 4, e09560. doi: 10.7554/eLife.09560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carbonell, E., & Mosquera, M. (2006). The emergence of a symbolic behaviour: the sepulchral pit of Sima de los Huesos, Sierra de Atapuerca, Burgos, Spain. Comptes Rendus Palevol, 5, 155–160. doi: 10.1016/j.crpv.2005.11.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dirks, P. H. G. M., Kibii, J. M., Kuhn, B. F., Steininger, C., Churchill, S. E., Kramers, J. D., Pickering, R., Farber, D. L., Mériaux, A.-S., Herries, A. I. R., King, G. C. P., & Berger, L. R. (2010). Geological setting and age of Australopithecus sediba from Southern Africa. Science, 328, 205–208. doi: 10.1126/science.1184950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dirks, P. H. G. M., Berger, L. R., Roberts, E. M., Kramers, J. D., Hawks, J., Randolph-Quinney, P. S., Elliott, M., Musiba, C. M., Churchill, S. E., De Ruiter, D. J., Schmid, P., Backwell, L. R., Belyanin, G. A., Boshoff, P., Hunter, K. L., Feuerriegel, E. M., Gurtov, A., Du, J., Harrison, G., Hunter, R., Kruger, A., Morris, H., Makhubela, T. V., Peixotto, B., & Tucker, S. (2015). Geological and taphonomic context for the new hominin species Homo naledi from the Dinaledi Chamber, South Africa. eLife, 4, e09561. doi: 10.7554/eLife.09561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Handwerk, B. (2015). What makes a fossil a member of the human family tree?, http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/what-makes-fossil-member-human-family-tree-180956572/. Accessed 30 May 2016.
  7. Joordens, J. C. A., D’errico, F., Wesselingh, F. P., Munro, S., De Vos, J., Wallinga, J., Ankjærgaard, C., Reimann, T., Wijbrans, J. R., Kuiper, K. F., Mücher, H. J., Coqueugniot, H., Prié, V., Joosten, I., Van Os, B., Schulp, A. S., Panuel, M., Van Der Haas, V., Lustenhouwer, W., Reijmer, J. J. G., & Roebroeks, W. (2015). Homo erectus at Trinil on Java used shells for tool production and engraving. Nature, 518, 228–231. doi: 10.1038/nature13962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Leakey, M. G., Spoor, F., Dean, M. C., Feibel, C. S., Antón, S. C., Kiarie, C., & Leakey, L. N. (2012). New fossils from Koobi Fora in northern Kenya confirm taxonomic diversity in early Homo. Nature, 488, 201–204. doi: 10.1038/nature11322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lordkipanidze, D., et al. (2013). A complete skull from Dmanisi, Georgia, and the evolutionary biology of early Homo. Science, 342, 326–331. doi: 10.1126/science.1238484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Schmid, P., Churchill, S. E., Nalla, S., Weissen, E., Carlson, K. J., De Ruiter, D. J., & Berger, L. R. (2013). Mosaic morphology in the thorax of Australopithecus sediba. Science, 340, 1234598. doi: 10.1126/science.1234598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Spaemann, R. (2006). Persons. The difference between ‘Someone’ and ‘Something’. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Villmoare, B., Kimbel, W. H., Seyoum, C., Campisano, C. J., Dimaggio, E. N., Rowan, J., Braun, D. R., Arrowsmith, J. R., & Reed, K. E. (2015). Early Homo at 2.8 Ma from Ledi-Geraru, Afar, Ethiopia. Science, 347, 1352–1355. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wood, B. A., & Collard, M. (1999). The human genus. Science, 284, 65–71. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5411.65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of NavarraNavarraSpain

Personalised recommendations