Advertisement

Let’s Learn Together: Team Integration Climate, Individual States and Learning Using Computer-Based Simulations

  • Leonardo Caporarello
  • Massimo MagniEmail author
  • Ferdinando Pennarola
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 23)

Abstract

The present study analyses individual learning in a computer-based simulation setting (business game). In particular, the study points out the importance of the team environment in stimulating individual states that may foster individual learning. By taking into account 402 individuals who participated in a computer-based simulation, we underscore that individual perception of integration climate fosters individual curiosity and decreases individual aggressiveness. Moreover, we outline that individual curiosity does have an impact on individual learning.

Keywords

Business game Team learning Curiosity Technology-based education 

References

  1. 1.
    Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Meyer, J. P. (2003). Four territories of experience: A developmental action inquiry approach to outdoor-adventure experiential learning. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2(4), 352–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. (2001). Research commentary: Computer mediated learning—A call for greater depth and breadth for research. Information System Research, 12, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lundgren, T. D., & Nantz, K. S. (2003). Student attitudes toward internet courses: A longitudinal study. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 43(3), 61–66.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alavi, M. (1994). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation. MIS Quarterly, 18(3), 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Michaelson, R., Helliar, C., Power, D., & Sinclair, D. (2001). Evaluating FINESSE: A case-study in group-based CAL. Computers & Education, 37(1), 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Proserpio L., & Magni, M. (2005). Learning through business games. In Encyclopaedia of multimedia technology and networking, Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gladstein, D. L. (1984). Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 499–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shuell, T. J. (1986). Cognitive Conceptions of Learning. Review of Educational Research, 56(4), 411–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pellegrino, J. W., & Glaser, R. (1982). Analyzing aptitudes for learning: inductive reasoning. In R. Glasser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 269–345). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weiss, M., Hoegl, M., & Gibbert, M. (2011). Making virtue of necessity: The role of team climate for innovation in resource constrained innovation projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(s1), 196–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    O’Reilly, C. A., & Caldwell, D. F. (1985). The impact of normative social influence and cohesiveness on task perceptions and attitudes: A social information processing approach. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 58, 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you’re having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York City: McGraw-Hill Companies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Erdogan, B., Liden, R. C., & Kraimer, M. L. (2006). Justice and leader-member exchange: The moderating role of organizational culture. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hoegl, M., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2001). Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization Science, 12(4), 435–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Li, J. T., & Hambrick, D. C. (2005). Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 794–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leonardo Caporarello
    • 1
  • Massimo Magni
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ferdinando Pennarola
    • 1
  1. 1.Bocconi UniversityMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations