Advertisement

What Identities in the Present May Mean for the Future of the Western Balkans

  • Iris Žeželj
  • Felicia Pratto
Chapter

Abstract

The post-conflict generation experiences ethno-religious identity as being thrust upon them, regardless of how much they care about belonging to such groups. Language and physical barriers segregate groups; in addition, one ethnic group in each nation is promoted above others in constitutions and political rhetoric. Because religious groups and ethnicities overlap almost perfectly, identifying with one is the same as identifying with the other, and that leaves little opportunity to develop complex identities that can overlap with those of different others. Yet young adults do not want inequality to be made of the meaning of their social identity and minor changes in social practices could help build nations as communities.

References

  1. Aidt, T., Dutta, J., & Senna, V. (2008). Governance regimes, corruption and growth: Theory and evidence. Journal of Comparative Economics, 36, 195–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, M. G., Brewer, M. B., & Livingston, R. W. (2005). Putting stereotype content in context: Image theory and interethnic stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 781–794.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bales, K. (2004). Disposable people: New slavery in the global economy. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
  4. Barzilai, G. (2003). Communities and Law: Politics and Cultures of Legal Identities. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berry, J. W., Phinney, J. S., Sam, D. L., & Vedder, P. (2006). Immigrant youth: Acculturation, identity, and adaptation. Applied Psychology, 55, 303–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bilali, R. (2014). The downsides of national identification for minority groups in intergroup conflicts in assimilationist societies. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53, 21–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bou Zeineddine, F., & Pratto, F. (2015). Political distrust: The seed and fruit of the popular empowerment. In J. van Prooijen & P. A. M. van Lange (Eds.), Power, politics, and paranoia (pp. 106–129). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, R., & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 255–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell, D. T. (1965). Ethnocentric and other altruistic motives. In D. Levine (Ed.), The Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1965 (pp. 283–311). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  10. Chrobot-Mason, D., Ruderman, M. N., Weber, T. J., & Ernst, C. (2009). The challenge of leading on unstable ground: Triggers that activate social identity faultlines. Human Relations, 62, 1763–1794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coleman, P. T., & Lowe, J. K. (2007). Conflict, identity, and resilience: Negotiating collective identities within the Israeli and Palestinian diasporas. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 24, 377–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Connor, W. (1990). When is a nation? Ethnic and Racial Studies, 13, 92–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dixon, J. A., Durrheim, K., & Tredoux, C. (2005). Beyond optimal contact: ‘A reality check’ for the contact hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 697–711.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dumont, M., Yzerbyt, V., Wigboldus, D., & Gordijn, E. H. (2003). Social categorization and fear reactions to the September 11th terrorist attacks. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1509–1520.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Eicher, V., Pratto, F., & Wilhelm, P. (2013). Value differentiation between enemies and allies: Value projection in national images. Political Psychology, 34, 127–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (Eds.). (1999). Social identity: Context, commitment, content. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  17. Esses, V. M., Dovidio, J. F., Jackson, L. M., & Armstrong, T. L. (2001). The immigration dilemma: The role of perceived group competition, ethnic prejudice, and national identity. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 389–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Banker, B. S., Houlette, M., Johnson, K. M., & McGlynn, E. A. (2000). Reducing intergroup conflict: From superordinate goals to decategorization, recategorization, and mutual differentiation. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4, 98–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haslam, N., Rothschild, L., & Ernst, D. (2000). Essentialist beliefs about social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 113–127.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Herrmann, R. K. (1985). Perceptions and behavior in Soviet foreign policy. University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  22. Higgins, E. T. (1996). Shared reality in the self-system: The social nature of self-regulation. European review of social psychology, 7, 1–29.Google Scholar
  23. Huntington, S. P. (1993). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century (vol. 4). Okla: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  24. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (vol. 1). New York: Holt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kosterman, R., & Feshbach, S. (1989). Toward a measure of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes. Political Psychology, 10, 257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leach, C. W., Zeineddine, F. B., & Čehajić-Clancy, S. (2013). Moral immemorial: The rarity of self-criticism for previous generations’ genocide or mass violence. Journal of Social Issues, 69, 34–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu, J. H., Sibley, C. G., & Huang, L. L. (2014). History matters: The impact of culture-specific symbols on political attitudes and intergroup relations. Political Psychology, 35, 57–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, & society. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  30. Micinski, N. R. (2016). NGO Frequent Flyers: Youth organizations and undermining reconciliation in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of Peacebuilding and Development, 11, 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Milošević-Đorđević, J. S., & Žeželj, I. L. (2016). Civic activism online: Making young people dormant or more active in real life? Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 113–118.Google Scholar
  32. Nagle, J. (2014). From the politics of antagonistic recognition to agonistic peace building: An exploration of symbols and rituals in divided societies. Peace and Change, 39, 468–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pattyn, S., van Hiel, A., Dhont, & Onraet. (2011). Stripping the political cynic: A psychological exploration of political cynicism. European Journal of Personality, 26, 566–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Phinney, J. S. (1990). Ethnic identity in adolescents and adults: Review of research. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 499–514.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Phinney, J. (1992). The multigroup ethnic identity measure: A new scale for use with diverse groups. Journal of Adolescent Research, 7, 156–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Phinney, J. S., Berry, J. W., Vedder, P., & Liebkind, K. (2006). The acculturation experience: Attitudes, identities, and behaviors of immigrant youth. In J. W. Berry, J. S. Phinney, D. Sam, & P. Vedder (Eds.), Immigrant youth in cultural transition: Acculturation, identity, and adaptation across national contexts (pp. 71–116). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  38. Pinker, S. (2012). The better angels of our nature. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  39. Pratto, F., & Bou Zeineddine, F. (2016, January). What Arabs understand that the outside world does not. Paper presented at the Doha/AUB conference on the future of Arab Democratization, January, Beirut.Google Scholar
  40. Pratto, F., & Glasford, D. E. (2008). Ethnocentrism, and the value of a human life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1141–1428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pratto, F., Hegarty, P., & Korchmaros, J. (2008). Who gets stereotyped? How communication practices and category norms lead people to stereotype particular people and groups. In Y. Kashima, K. Fiedler, & P. Freytag (Eds.), Stereotype dynamics: Language-based approaches to stereotype formation, maintenance and change (pp. 299–319). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.Google Scholar
  42. Pratto, F., & Stewart, A. L. (2012). Group dominance and the half-blindness of privilege. Journal of Social Issues, 68, 28–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pratto, F., Stewart, A. L., & Bou Zeineddine, F. (2013). When inequality fails: Power, group dominance, and societal change. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 1, 132–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Psaltis, C., Franc, R., Smeekes, A., Ioannou, M., & Žeželj, I. (2017). Social representations of the past in postconflict societies: Adherence to official historical narratives and distrust through heightened threats. In C. Psaltis, M. Carretero, & S. Čehajić-Clansy (Eds.), History education and conflict transformation: Social psychological theories, history teaching and reconciliation. Palgrave.Google Scholar
  45. Rice, S. E., Graff, C., & Lewis, J. (2006). Poverty and civil war: What policymakers need to know. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  46. Ridgeway, C. L., & Bourg, C. (2004). Gender as status: An expectation states theory approach. In A. H. Eagly, A. E. Beall, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (pp. 217–241). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  47. Robbins, B. G. (2012). A blessing and a curse? Political institutions in the growth and decay of generalized trust: A cross-national panel analysis, 1980–2009. PLoS ONE, 7(4), e35120.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Rosenthal, D. A., & Hrynevich, C. (1985). Ethnicity and ethnic identity: A comparative study of Greek-, Italian-, and Anglo-Australian adolescents. International Journal of Psychology, 20, 723–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Saguy, T., Dovidio, J. F., & Pratto, F. (2008). Beyond contact: Intergroup contact in the context of power relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 432–445.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Sidanius, J., Feshbach, S., Levin, S., & Pratto, F. (1997). The interface between ethnic and national attachment: Ethnic pluralism or ethnic dominance? The Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 102–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sidanius, J., & Petrocik, J. R. (2001). Communal and national identity in a multiethnic state. In Ashmore, R.D., Jussim, L., & Wilder, D. (Eds.), Social identity, intergroup conflict and conflict resolution (pp. 101–127). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Smith, A. D. (2002). When is a nation? Geopolitics, 7, 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stephan, W. G., & Renfro, C. L. (2002). The role of threat in intergroup relations. In D. M. Mackie & E. R. Smith (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 191–207). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  55. Swann, W. B., & Read, S. J. (1981). Self-verification processes: How we sustain our self-conceptions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 351–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. CUP Archive.Google Scholar
  57. Tishkov. (2000). Forget the ‘nation’: Postnationalist understanding of nationalism. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 23, 625–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tropp, L., & Pettigrew, T. (2005). Relationships between intergroup contact and prejudice among minority and majority status groups. Psychological Science, 16, 951–956.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Turner, R. N., Hewstone, M., Voci, A., & Vonofakou, C. (2008). A test of the extended intergroup contact hypothesis: The mediating role of intergroup anxiety, perceived ingroup and outgroup norms, and inclusion of the outgroup in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 843–860.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Van den Berghe, P. L. (1981). The Ethnic phenomenon. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  61. Verkuyten, M. (2004). The social psychology of ethnic identity. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  62. Verkuyten, M. (2005). Ethnic group identification and group evaluation among minority and majority groups: Testing the multiculturalism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 121–138.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Verkuyten, M., & Martinovic, B. (2012). Social identity complexity and immigrants’ attitude toward the host nation the intersection of ethnic and religious group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1165–1177.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Verkuyten, M., & Yildiz, A. A. (2007). National (dis) identification and ethnic and religious identity: A study among Turkish-Dutch Muslims. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1448–1462.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Wilson, B., van Lujik, N., & Boit, M. K. (2013). When celebrity athletes are ‘social movement entrepreneurs’: A study of the role of elite runners in run-for-peace events in post-conflict Kenya in 2008. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 50, 929–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ythier, J. M. (2013, Sep–Oct). Distributive justice and benevolence: The welfare state as practical, distributive liberal social contract. REP, 123, 737–761.Google Scholar
  67. Yzerbyt, V., Rocher, S., & Schadron, G. (1997). Stereotypes as explanations: A subjective essentialistic view of group perception. In R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 20–50). Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  68. Zack, P. J., & Knack, S. (1998). Trust and growth. Journal of Economic Literature, 138.Google Scholar
  69. Zagefka, H. (2009). The concept of ethnicity in social psychological research: Definitional issues. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 33, 228–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Žeželj, I., Ioannou, M., Franc R., Psaltis, C., & Martinovic, B. (2017). The role of inter-ethnic online friendships in prejudice reduction in post-conflict societies: Evidence from Serbia, Croatia and Cyprus. Computers in Human Behavior 76, 386–395.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iris Žeželj
    • 1
  • Felicia Pratto
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of ConnecticutMansfieldUSA

Personalised recommendations