• Felicia Pratto


Identity hinges not on one’s unique self, nor on one’s relations to others, but on who the others are. In small, isolated communities, the others are relatives and other villagers. Through historical processes like religious conversion and the invention of nationalism, social categories spread across in-person communities, so one can share an identity with people one will never know personally. Moreover, one can have many kinds of overlapping identities (e.g., work, nationality, gender). In unstable times, such as war, identities change and may not be transferred from parents to children. In this volume, the authors examine the interplay between identities among both majority and minority young adults in Bosnia-Herzegovina, Serbia, Kosovo, and Macedonia.


  1. Bou Zeineddine, F., & Pratto, F. (2015). Political distrust: The seed and fruit of the popular empowerment. In J. van Prooijen & P. A. M. van Lange (Eds.), Power, politics, and paranoia (pp. 106–129). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Breuilly, J. (1994). Nationalism and the state. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cooley, C. H. (1992). Human nature and the social order. Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Fromm, E. (1965). Escape from freedom. New York: Avon Books.Google Scholar
  5. Hogg, M. A. (2007). Uncertainty-identity theory. In M. P. Zanna & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 39 (pp. 69–126). San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. King, R. (2003). Michaelangelo and the Pope’s ceiling. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  7. Kosterman, R., & Feshbach, S. (1989). Toward a measure of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes. Political Psychology, 10, 257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lee, I., Pratto, F., & Johnson, B. T. (2011). Support of social hierarchy: Individualistic cultures, liberal political environments, and decreased power increase intergroup dissension. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 1029–1064.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Mackie, D. M., & Smith, E. R. (1998). Intergroup relations: Insights from a theoretically integrative approach. Psychological Review, 105, 499–529.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. McFarland, S., Webb, M., & Brown, D. (2012). All humanity is my ingroup: A measure and studies of identification with all humanity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 830–853.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society (Vol. 111). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Moghaddam, F. M. (2009). Omniculturalism: Policy solutions to fundamentalism in the era of fractured globalization. Culture & Psychology, 15, 337–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Prati, F., Crisp, R. J., Pratto, F., & Rubini, M. (2016). Encouraging majority support for immigrant access to health services: Multiple categorization and social identity complexity as antecedents of health equality. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19, 426–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Prati, F., Moscatelli, S., Rubini, M., & Pratto, F. (2015). Predicting support for Arabs’ autonomy from social dominance: The role of identity complexity and dehumanization. Political Psychology, 37, 293–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pratto, F., & Glasford, D. E. (2008). Ethnocentrism, and the value of a human life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1141–1428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., & Levin, S. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 271–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Roccas, S., & Brewer, M. B. (2002). Social identity complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 88–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sacks, H. (1979). Hotrodder: A revolutionary category. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 7–14). New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  19. Sidanius, J., Feshbach, S., Levin, S., & Pratto, F. (1997). The interface between ethnic and national attachment: Ethnic pluralism or ethnic dominance? The Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 102–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In S. Oskamp & S. Oskamp (Eds.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23–45). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Stewart, A. L., Pratto, F., Bou Zeineddine, F., Sweetman, J., Eicher, V., Licata, L., … Cichocka, A. (2016). International support for the Arab uprisings: Understanding sympathy protests using theories of Social Identity and Social Dominance. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 19, 6–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Strathern, P. (2015). Death in Florence: Savonarola, the Medici, and the battle for the soul of a renaissance city. New York: Pegasus Books.Google Scholar
  23. Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). An integrative theory of intergroup relations. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  25. Tausch, N., Becker, J. C., Spears, R., Christ, O., Saab, R., Singh, P., & Siddiqui, R. N. (2011). Explaining radical group behavior: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and nonnormative collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 129–148.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Felicia Pratto
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychological SciencesUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA

Personalised recommendations