DMBD 2017: Data Mining and Big Data pp 105-112 | Cite as

Cascade Spatial Autoregression for Air Pollution Prediction

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10387)

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed a growing interest in air quality prediction and a variety of predictions models have been applied for this task. However, all of these models only use local attributes of each site for prediction and neglect the spatial context. Indeed, the concentrations of air pollutants follow the first law of geography: everything is related to everything else, but nearby things are more related than distinct things. To that end, in this paper, we apply the spatial autoregression model (SAR) to air pollution prediction, which considers both local attributes and predictions from the neighborhoods. Specifically, as SAR can only handle a snapshot of spatial data but our input data are time series, we develop the cascade SAR, which is able to take care of both spatial and temporal dimensions without incurring extra computation. Finally, the effectiveness of the cascade SAR is validated on the dataset of the London Air Quality Network.

Keywords

Cascade spatial autoregression Air pollution prediction 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by SDPD (No. 2014106101003 and 201510414000079).

References

  1. 1.
    Anselin, L.: Spatial regression. In: The Sage Handbook of Spatial Analysis, pp. 255–275. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burnett, R.T., Smith-Doiron, M., Stieb, D., Cakmak, S., Brook, J.R.: Effects of particulate and gaseous air pollution on cardiorespiratory hospitalizations. Arch. Environ. Heal. 54(2), 130–139 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chun, Y., Griffith, D.: Spatial Statistics and Geostatistics: Theory and Applications for Geographic Information Science and Technology. SAGE, Los Angeles (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Grivas, G., Chaloulakou, A.: Artificial neural network models for prediction of PM10 hourly concentrations in the greater area of Athens. Atmos. Environ. 40, 1216–1229 (2006). GreeceCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hernandez, E., Martin, F., Valero, F.: Statistical forecast models for daily air particulate iron and lead concentrations for Madrid. Atmos. Environ. 26B, 107–116 (1992). SpainCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kolehmainen, M., Martikainen, H., Ruuskanen, J.: Neural networks and periodic components used in air quality forecasting. Atmos. Environ. 35, 815–825 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Spurny, K.R.: On the physics, chemistry and toxicology of ultrafine anthropogenic, atmospheric aerosols (UAAA): new advances. Toxicolog. Lett. 96, 253–261 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schlink, U., Dorling, S., Pelikan, E., Nunnari, G., Cawley, G.: A rigorous inter-comparison of ground-level oregion predictions. Atmos. Environ. 37, 3237–3253 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dongguan University of TechnologyDongguanChina

Personalised recommendations