Measurement of Language Use and Language Proficiency, and Literacy and Its Analysis

  • Jacob S. Siegel
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter I describe some measures of language use and measures of proficiency in the use of the national language (e.g., English in the United States) by foreign-born residents. This material should be useful in measuring the linguistic resources of a society, advancing the civil rights of minorities, evaluating the progress toward integration and linguistic acculturation of immigrants, developing a more nuanced concept of ethnicity, and analyzing sociolinguistic data obtained in social surveys.

References and Suggested Readings

General

  1. Haug, W. (2009). Ethnic, religious and language groups: Towards a set of rules for data collection and statistical analysis. New York: Open Society Institute.Google Scholar
  2. Lightfoot, D. (2006). How new languages emerge. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. See Chapter 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Verdoodt, A. F. (1998). The demography of language. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), Handbook of sociolinguistics (pp. 33–43). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

Measurement of Language Use

  1. American Anthropological Association. (2014, March–April). Anthropology News 55(3).Google Scholar
  2. Espenshade, T. J., & Fu, H. (1997). An analysis of English language proficiency among U.S. immigrants. American Sociological Review, 62, 288–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kominski, R. (1989). How good is ‘How well’? An examination of the English-speaking ability question. Paper presented at the 1989 annual meeting of the American Statistical Association, August 6–11, 1989, Washington, DC. Population Division, U.S. Census Bureau. Accessed at www.census.gov/hhes/
  4. Lüdi, G., Werlen, I., Franceschini, R., Antonini, F., et al. (1997). Le Recensement federal de la population 1990: Le paysage linguistique de la Suisse. Bern: Bundesamt für Statistik.Google Scholar
  5. Service, E., & Clark, F. I. M. (1993). Differences between younger and older adults in learning a foreign language. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 608–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Siegel, J. S. (2002). Applied demography: Applications to business, government, law, and public policy. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  7. US Department of Education. Office of Planning, Budget, and Evaluation. (1987). Numbers of English proficient children: National, state, and language-specific estimates. Mimeographed report.Google Scholar
  8. US Census Bureau. (2008). Comparison of the estimates on language use and English-speaking ability from the ACS, the CPS, and Census 2000. Language Comparison Report 2008–03. This report can be accessed at www.census.gov/acs/
  9. Verdoodt, A. F. (1998). The demography of language. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), Handbook of sociolinguistics (pp. 33–43). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

Determinants of English Language Proficiency

  1. Beenstock, M., Chiswick, B. R., & Repetto, G. L. (2001). The effect of linguistic distance and country of origin on immigrant language skills: Application to Israel. International Migration Review, 39(3), 33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chiswick, B. R., & Miller, P. W. (2001). A model of destination-language acquisition: Applications to male immigrants in Canada. Demography, 38(3), 391–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gianollo, C., Guardano, C., & Longobardi, G. (2004). Historical implications of a formal theory of syntactic variation. Paper presented at DIGS VIII. Yale University. MS: University of Trieste.Google Scholar
  4. Hart-Gonzalez, L., & Lindemann, S. (1993). Expected achievement in speaking proficiency. Washington, DC: School of Language Studies, Foreign Services Institute, Department of State. Mimeographed document.Google Scholar
  5. Longobardi, P. (2002). Parametric comparison and historical relatedness. Paper presented at DIGS VII, Girona.Google Scholar
  6. Longobardi, G. (2003). On parameters and parameter theory. In E. Stark & U. Wandruszka (Eds.), Syntaxtheorien: Modelle, methoden, motive (pp. 273–290). Tubingen: GunterNarr.Google Scholar
  7. Massey, D. S., & Espinosa, K. E. (1997, Spring). Determinants of English proficiency among Mexican migrants to the United States. International Migration Review 31(1).Google Scholar
  8. Rumbaut, R. G., Massey, D. S., & Bean, F. D. (2006). Linguistic life expectancies: Immigrant language retention in Southern California. Population and Development Review, 32(3), 447–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Age, Period, and Cohort Analysis

  1. Frenk, S. M., Yang, C. Y., & Land, K. C. (2013). Assessing the significance of cohort and period effects in hierarchical age-period-cohort models: Applications to verbal test scores and voter turnout in US Presidential elections. Social Forces, 92, 221–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Glenn, N. D. (1994). Television watching, newspaper reading and cohort differences in verbal ability. Sociology of Education, 67(3), 216–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Glenn, N. D. (2005). Cohort analysis (2nd Edn.). Quantitative applications in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  4. Halli, S. S., & Rao, K. V. (1992). Chapter 3: Age, period, and cohort analysis in demography. In Advanced techniques of demographic analysis (pp. 37–61). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  5. Hobcraft, J., Mencken, J., & Preston, S. (1982). Age,-period, and cohort effects in demography: A review. Population Index, 48, 4–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Luo, L. (2013). Assessing validity and application scope of the intrinsic estimator approach to the age-period-cohort problem. Demography, 50, 1946–1967.Google Scholar
  7. Luo, L., & Hodges, J. (2013). A new age-period-cohort model for describing and investigating inter- and intra-cohort effects. Working paper. Minneapolis: Minnesota Population Center.Google Scholar
  8. Luo, L., & Warren, J. R. (2014). Describing and explaining age, period, and cohort trends in Americans’ vocabulary knowledge. Accessed on Internet, May 25, 2014. Originally presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Boston, MA, April 30–May 2, 2014.Google Scholar
  9. Mason, W. M., & Fienberg, S. E. (Eds.). (1985). Cohort analysis in social research: Beyond the identification problem. New York: Springer. See esp. papers by W. M. Mason and S. E. Fienberg, S. E. Fienberg and W. M. Mason, and W. M. Mason and H. L. Smith.Google Scholar
  10. O’Brien, R. M. (2011). The age-period-cohort conundrum as two fundamental problems. Quantity and Quality, 45(6), 1429–1444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ryder, N. (1965). The cohort as a concept in the study of social change. American Sociological Review, 30, 843–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rumbaut, R. G. (2009). A language graveyard? The evolution of language competencies, preferences, and use among young adult children of immigrants. In T. G. Wiley, J. S. Lee, & R. Rumberger (Eds.), The education of immigrant language minorities in the United States. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  13. Rumbaut, R. G., Bean, F. D., & Chavez, L. R. et al. (2008). Immigration and intergenerational mobility in Metropolitan Los Angeles (IIMMLA). Ann Arbor, MI. 2004 Computer File ICPSR 22627, vol.1, Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Science Research.Google Scholar
  14. Wiley, T. G. (2010). Language policy in the USA. In K. Potowski (Ed.), Language diversity in the USA (pp. 255–271). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Yang, Y. C., & Land, K. C. (2006). A mixed models approach to the age-period-cohort analysis of repeated cross-section surveys, with an application to trends in verbal test scores. Sociological Methodology, 36, 75–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Yang, Y. C., Schulhofer-Wohl, S., Wenjiang, J. F., & Land, K. C. (2008). The intrinsic estimator for age-period-cohort analysis: What it is and how to use it. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 1697–1736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Literacy

  1. Bangladesh, National Institute of Population Research and Training/Mitra and Associates, Bangladesh/Macro International, Calverton, M D, USA. (2009). Bangladesh demographic and health survey, 2007. Dacca/Bangladesh/Calverton: National Institute of Population Research and Training, Mitra and Associates, and Macro International.Google Scholar
  2. Basu, K., & Foster, J. (1998). On measuring literacy. The Economic Journal, 108, 1733–1749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Basu, K., & Lee, T. (2009). A new and easy-to-use measure, its axiomatic properties and an application. Social Choice and Welfare, 32, 181–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dutta, I. (2004). Generalized measures of literacy. Mathematical Social Sciences, 48, 68–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Permanyer, I., Garcia, J., & Esteve, A. (2013, December). The impact of educational homogamy on isolated literacy levels. Demography, 50(6), 2209–2225.Google Scholar
  6. Subramanian, S. (2004). Measuring literacy: Some extensions of the Basu-Foster framework. Journal of Development Economics, 73, 453–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. UNESCO, Institute of Lifetime Learning. (2013). Second global report on adult learning and education: Rethinking literacy; summary and recommendations (GRALE II). Geneva: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  8. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Conference of European Statisticians. (2006). Recommendations for the 2010 censuses of population and housing. New York/Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
  9. United Nations, Statistical Division. (2008). Principles and recommendations for population and housing censuses, revision 2, Statistical papers series M, no. 67 (Rev. 2). New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  10. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics, Kirsch, I., Jungeblut, A., and Mosenthal, B. (1998). The measurement of adult literacy. Chapter 7 in National Center for Educational Statistics, Adult Literacy in OECD countries, Technical Report on the First International Adult Literacy Survey, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics.Google Scholar
  11. Warriner, D. (2011). Literacy. In J. Simpson (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 529–540). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacob S. Siegel
    • 1
  1. 1.North BethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations