Advertisement

Pandemic Rhetoric and Public Memory. What People (Don’t) Remember from the 2009 Swine Flu

  • Kristian Bjørkdahl
  • Benedicte Carlsen
Chapter
Part of the Rhetoric, Politics and Society book series (RPS)

Abstract

Pandemics are potentially very serious events, so to prepare for future episodes, we must learn from past cases. In this chapter, we have adapted a method from the ethnographic tradition, which we dub “spontaneous interviews,” and applied it to explore how members of the Norwegian public experienced the pandemic. Studying in particular what they remember about the pandemic rhetoric, we find that our informants misremember many aspects of the communication, ranging from a simple failure to remember, through factual errors, to creative assessments of the episode. We conclude that long-term responses to pandemic rhetoric depend not least on the rhetor’s preestablished credibility, and for this reason, we suggest, the health authorities appear to have little to lose from communicating outside the media in pandemic situations.

References

  1. Abeysinghe, Sudeepa. 2015. Pandemics, Science and Policy: H1N1 and the World Health Organisation. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ang, Ien. 1985/1982. Watching Dallas: Soap Opera and the Melodramatic Imagination. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  3. Aristotle, Roberts. 1929. Rhetoric. Translated by W. Rhys Roberts. https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/a/aristotle/a8rh/
  4. Atkinson, Max. 1984. Our Masters’ Voices: The Language and Body Language of Politics. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  5. Bieling, C., T. Plieninger, H. Pirker, and C.R. Vogl. 2014. Linkages Between Landscapes and Human Well-Being: An Empirical Exploration with Short Interviews. Ecological Economics 105: 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bitzer, Lloyd. 1968. The Rhetorical Situation. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 (1): 1–14.Google Scholar
  7. Bjørkdahl, Kristian. 2015. Metapanikk! Om svineinfluensautbruddets retoriske forviklinger. Nytt Norsk Tidsskrift 32 (2): 109–122.Google Scholar
  8. Black, Edwin. 1970. The Second Persona. Quarterly Journal of Speech 56 (2): 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blakely, Debra. 2015. Mass Mediated Disease: A Case Study Analysis of Three Flu Pandemics and Public Health Policy. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  10. Burgchardt, Carl. 2010. Readings in Rhetorical Criticism. 4th ed. State College: Strata Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Brekke, Ole Andreas, Kari Ludvigsen, and Kristian Bjørkdahl. 2017. Handling og usikkerhet: Norske myndigheters kommunikasjon om svineinfluensapandemien i 2009. Norsk statsvitenskapelig tidsskrift 32 (1): 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs. 1989. Man Cannot Speak for Her. Vol. 1, A Critical Study of Early Feminist Rhetoric. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  13. Charland, Maurice. 1987. Constitutive Rhetoric: The Case of the Peuple Québécois. Quarterly Journal of Speech 73 (2): 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chartier, Roger. 1994. The Order of Books: Readers, Authors, and Libraries in Europe Between the 14th and 18th Centuries. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Darnton, Robert. 1982. What Is the History of Books? Daedalus 111 (3): 65–83.Google Scholar
  16. Darnton, Robert. 2007. ‘What Is the History of Books?’ Revisited. Modern Intellectual History 4 (3): 495–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. DSB. 2010. Ny influensa A (H1N1) 2009: Gjennomgang av erfaringene i Norge. Rapport. Oslo: Direktoratet for samfunnssikkerhet og beredskap.Google Scholar
  18. Dunn, Jennifer. 2016. Going to Work at the Moonlite Bunny Ranch: Potentials of Rhetorical and Ethnographic Methods for Cultural Studies. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies 16 (6): 525–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ede, Lisa, and Andrea Lunsford. 1984. Audience Addressed/Audience Invoked: The Role of Audience in Composition Theory and Pedagogy. College Composition and Communication 35 (2): 155–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Endres, Danielle, Aaron Hess, Samantha Senda-Cook, and Michael Middleton. 2016. In Situ Rhetoric: Intersections between Qualitative Inquiry, Fieldwork, and Rhetoric. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies 16 (6): 511–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fuggeli, Per. 2009. Vaksinedemokrati. Verdens Gang 23 (October): 36–37.Google Scholar
  22. Geertz, Clifford. 2000. Available Light: Anthropological Reflections on Philosophical Topics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Gross, Alan. 1994. The Roles of Rhetoric in the Public Understanding of Science. Public Understanding of Science 3: 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hammersley, Martyn, and Paul Atkinson. 2007. Ethnography: Principles in Practice. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kiewe, Amos, and Davis W. Houck, eds. 2015. The Effects of Rhetoric and the Rhetoric of Effects: Past, Present, Future. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kiousis, Spiro. 2001. Public Trust or Mistrust? Perceptions of Media Credibility in the Information Age. Mass Communication and Society 4 (4): 381–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kjeldsen, Jens. 2016. Studying Rhetorical Audiences: A Call for Qualitative Reception Studies in Argumentation and Rhetoric. Informal Logic 36 (2): 136–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kohring, Matthias, and Jörg Matthes. 2007. Trust in News Media: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Scale. Communication Research 34 (2): 231–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Light, Elinor. 2016. Visualizing Homeland: Remembering 9/11 and the Production of the Surveilling Flâneur. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies 16 (6): 536–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Machor, James. 1993. Introduction: Readers/Texts/Contexts. In Readers in History: Nineteenth-Century American Literature and the Contexts of Response, ed. James Machor. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  31. McHendry, George. 2016. Thank You for Participating in Security: Engaging Airport Security Checkpoints via Participatory Critical Rhetoric. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies 16 (6): 548–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McKinnon, Sara, Jenell Johnson, Robert Asen, Karma Chávez, and Robert Glenn Howard. 2016. Rhetoric and Ethics Revisited: What Happens When Rhetorical Scholars Go into the Field. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies 16 (6): 560–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Middleton, Michael, Samantha Senda-Cook, Aaron Hess, and Danielle Endres. 2016. Contemplating the Participatory Turn in Rhetorical Criticism. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies 16 (6): 571–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Morley, David. 1980. The “Nationwide” Audience: Structure and Decoding. London: BFI.Google Scholar
  35. Newman, Nic, et al. 2016. Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2016. Oxford: University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  36. Ong, Walter. 1975. The Writer’s Audience is Always a Fiction. PMLA 90 (1): 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Phillips, Kendall. 2010. The Failure of Memory: Reflections on Rhetoric and Public Remembrance. Western Journal of Communication 74 (2): 208–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Radway, Janice. 1984. Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Literature. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  39. Rorty, Richard. 1982. Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  40. Seef, Sameh, and Anders Jeppsson. 2013. Is It a Policy Crisis or Is It a Health Crisis? The Egyptian Context—Analysis of the Egyptian Health Policy for the H1N1 Flu Pandemic Control. Pan African Medical Journal 14 (1). doi: 10.11604/pamj.2013.14.59.1631.
  41. Sipiora, Philip, and James Baumlin, eds. 2002. Rhetoric and Kairos: Essays in History, Theory, and Praxis. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  42. Stromer-Galley, Jennifer, and Edward Schiappa. 1998. The Argumentative Burdens of Audience Conjectures: Audience Research in Popular Culture Criticism. Communication Theory 8 (1): 27–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vasterman, Peter, and Nel Ruigrok. 2013. Pandemic Alarm in the Dutch Media: Media Coverage of the 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) Pandemic and the Role of the Expert Sources. European Journal of Communication 28 (4): 436–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vatz, Richard. 1973. The Myth of the Rhetorical Situation. Philosophy & Rhetoric 6 (3): 154–161.Google Scholar
  45. Vigsø, Orla. 2010. Naming Is Framing: Swine Flu, New Flu, and A(H1N1). Observatorio (OBS*) Journal 4 (3): 229–241.Google Scholar
  46. White, James Boyd. 1985. Heracles’ Bow: Essays on the Rhetoric and Poetics of the Law. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  47. Wolfson, Nessa. 1976. Speech Events and Natural Speech: Some Implications for Sociolinguistic Methodology. Language in Society 5 (2): 189–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zelizer, Barbie. 1995. Reading the Past Against the Grain: The Shape of Memory Studies. Critical Studies of Mass Communication 12 (2): 214–239.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristian Bjørkdahl
    • 1
  • Benedicte Carlsen
    • 1
  1. 1.Uni Research Rokkan CentreBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations