Finger-Knuckle-Print Verification with Score Level Adaptive Binary Fusion

  • David Zhang
  • Guangming Lu
  • Lei Zhang
Chapter

Abstract

Recently, a new biometrics identifier, namely finger knuckle print (FKP), has been proposed for personal authentication with very interesting results. One of the advantages of FKP verification lies in its user friendliness in data collection. However, the user flexibility in positioning fingers also leads to a certain degree of pose variations in the collected query FKP images. The widely used Gabor filtering based competitive coding scheme is sensitive to such variations, resulting in many false rejections. We propose to alleviate this problem by reconstructing the query sample with a dictionary learned from the template samples in the gallery set. The reconstructed FKP image can reduce much the enlarged matching distance caused by finger pose variations; however, both the intra-class and inter-class distances will be reduced. We then propose a score level adaptive binary fusion rule to adaptively fuse the matching distances before and after reconstruction, aiming to reduce the false rejections without increasing much the false acceptances. Experimental results on the benchmark PolyU FKP database show that the proposed method significantly improves the FKP verification accuracy.

Keywords

Biometrics Finger-knuckle-print Reconstruction Score level fusion 

References

  1. Aharon M, Elad M, Bruckstein A (2006) K-SVD: an algorithm for designing over complete dictionaries for sparse representation. IEEE Trans Signal Process 54(11):4311–4322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck A, Teboulle M (2009) A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems. SIAM J Imag Sci 2(1):183–202MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Candès E, Romberg J (2005) 1-Magic: recovery of sparse signals via convex programming [Online]. http://www.acm.caltech.edu/l1magic/
  4. Daugman J (2003) The importance of being random: statistical principles of iris recognition. Pattern Recogn 36(2):279–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eberhart R, Kennedy J (2010) Swarm intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  6. Kim S, Koh K, Lustig M, Boyd S, Gorinevsky D (2007) An interior point method for large-scale l1-regularized least squares. IEEE J Sel Topics Signal Process 1(4):606–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kong W, Zhang D (2004) Competitive coding scheme for palmprint verification. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on pattern recognition, vol 1, pp 520–523Google Scholar
  8. Kumar A, Kanhangad V, Zhang D (2010) A new framework for adaptive multimodal biometrics management. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 5(1):92–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Malioutove D, Cetin M, Willsky A (2005) Homotopy continuation for sparse signal representation. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech signal processing, vol 5, pp 733–736Google Scholar
  10. Masip D, Lapedriza A, Vitria J (2009) Boosted online learning for face recognition. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet B Cybernet 39(2):530–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rubinstein R, Bruckstein A, Elad M (2010) Dictionaries for sparse representation modeling. Proc IEEE 98(6):1045–1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Singh R, Vatsa M, Ross A, Noore A (2010) Biometric classifier update using online learning: a case study in near infrared face verification. Image Vis Comput 28(7):1098–1105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Snelick R, Uludag U, Mink A, Indovina M, Jain A (2005) Large-scale evaluation of multimodal biometric authentication using state-of-the-art systems. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 27(3):450–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wang S, Zhang L, Liang Y, Pan Q (2012) Semi-coupled dictionary learning with applications to image super-resolution and photo-sketch image synthesis. Proc IEEE Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recogn:2216–2223Google Scholar
  15. Wright J, Yang A, Ganesh A, Sastry S, Ma Y (2009) Robust face recognition via sparse representation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 31(2):210–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Yang J, Zhang Y (2011) Alternating direction algorithms for_1-problems in compressive sensing. SIAM J Sci Comput 33(1):250–278MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Yang M, Zhang L, Yang J, Zhang D (2010) Metaface learning for sparse representation based face recognition. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on image processing, pp 1601–1604Google Scholar
  18. Yang M, Zhang L, Feng X, Zhang D (2011) Fisher discrimination dictionary learning for sparse representation. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference computer vision, pp 543–550Google Scholar
  19. Zhang D, Lu G, Li W, Zhang L, Luo N (2009a) Palmprint recognition using 3-D information. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C Appl Rev 39(5):505–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhang L, Zhang L, Zhang D (2009b) Finger-knuckle-print: a new biometric identifier. In: Proceedings of 16th IEEE international conference on image processing, pp 1981–1984Google Scholar
  21. Zhang L, Zhang L, Zhang D (2009c) Finger-knuckle-print verification based on band-limited phase-only correlation. In: Proceedings of international conference on computer analysis of images patterns, pp 141–148Google Scholar
  22. Zhang L, Zhang L, Zhang D, Zhu H (2010) Online finger-knuckle print verification for personal authentication. Pattern Recogn 43(7):2560–2571CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhang L, Zhang L, Zhang D, Zhu H (2011) Ensemble of local and global information for finger-knuckle-print recognition. Pattern Recogn 44(9):1990–1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhang L, Zhang L, Zhang D, Guo Z (2012) Phase congruency induced local features for finger-knuckle-print recognition. Pattern Recogn 45(7):2522–2531CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Zhang
    • 1
  • Guangming Lu
    • 2
  • Lei Zhang
    • 1
  1. 1.The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHong KongChina
  2. 2.Shenzhen Graduate SchoolHarbin Institute of TechnologyShenzhenChina

Personalised recommendations