Advertisement

The Classroom Physical Space as a Learning Ecosystem - Bridging Approaches: Results from a Web Survey

  • Lara Sardinha
  • Ana Margarida Pisco Almeida
  • Maria Potes Barbas
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 80)

Abstract

The classroom physical space enfolds several dimensions such as the social, cultural, architectural and technological. The current scenario of digitally equipped classrooms in which new pedagogical approaches based on collaborative learning, project-based learning and personalized learning are being used, call for the need to rethink the classroom physical space. Despite of the existence of some new classroom physical spaces aiming to answer this new reality, like the Future Classroom Lab, we argue that there might be lacking an innovative interior design strategy encompassing these aspects and fulfilling all the classroom physical space dimensions. Thus, this paper aims to present the perspective the authors have concerning the classroom physical space as a learning ecosystem and to start building the bridges between different approaches to space and relating them to the classroom physical space, in order to create an innovative interior design strategy that will improve the use of classroom physical space in its different dimensions. We also present the first results of an European web survey applied to the European Schoolnet Future Classroom network members that aimed at understanding how their spaces were thought and how they are being perceived; a brief discussion of the results, which, overall, are positive, is also presented. The paper ends with some references to the future work.

Keywords

Classroom physical space Smart learning ecosystems Classroom orchestration Enabling spaces Human-building interaction Smart classroom Spatial semiotics Spatial pedagogy 

References

  1. Alavi HS, Churchill E, Kirk D et al (2016a) Deconstructing human-building interaction. Interactions 23:60–62. doi: 10.1145/2991897
  2. Alavi HS, Lalanne D, Nembrini J et al (2016b) Future of human-building interaction. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems - CHI EA 2016. ACM Press, New York, pp 3408–3414Google Scholar
  3. ASLERD (2016) TIMISOARA DECLARATION better learning for a better world through people centred smart learning ecosystemsGoogle Scholar
  4. Bautista G, Borges F (2013) Smart classrooms: innovation in formal learning spaces to transform learning experiences. Bull IEEE Tech Committeee Learn Technol 15:18–21. http://lttf.ieee.org/
  5. Burke DD (2015) Scale-Up! classroom design and use can facilitate learning. Law Teach 49:189–205. doi: 10.1080/03069400.2015.1014180 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dillenbourg P, Fischer F (2007) Basics of computer-supported collaborative learning. Zeitschrift für Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik 21:111–130Google Scholar
  7. Dillenbourg P, Jermann P (2007) Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning. Springer, BostonGoogle Scholar
  8. Dillenbourg P, Sharples M, Fischer F et al (2011) Trends in orchestration. Second research and technology scouting reportGoogle Scholar
  9. European Schoolnet (2016) Future classroom lab learning zones. 1–10Google Scholar
  10. Galego D, Giovannella C, Mealha Ó (2016) An investigation of actors’ differences in the perception of learning ecosystems’ smartness: the Aveiro University case. Interact Des Archit - Proc 1st Smart Learn Ecosyst Reg Dev Conf 31:1–13Google Scholar
  11. Giovannella C (2014a) Smart learning eco-systems: ‘fashion’ or ‘beef’? J e-Learning Knowl Soc 10:15–23Google Scholar
  12. Giovannella C (2014b) Where’s the smartness of learning in smart territories? Smart city learn oppor challenges - EC-TEL 2014 work 1–6Google Scholar
  13. Hall ET (1959) The silent language. Double & Day Company, Inc., Garden CityGoogle Scholar
  14. Hall ET (1990) The hidden dimension, reprint. Anchor BooksGoogle Scholar
  15. Hillier B (2007) Space is the machine, electronic. Space Syntax, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Lim FV, O’Halloran KL, Podlasov A (2012) Spatial pedagogy: mapping meanings in the use of classroom space. Cambridge J Educ 42:235–251. doi: 10.1080/0305764X.2012.676629 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Park EL, Choi BK (2014) Transformation of classroom spaces: traditional versus active learning classroom in colleges. High Educ 68:749–771. doi: 10.1007/s10734-014-9742-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Perolini PS (2011) Interior spaces and the layers of meaningGoogle Scholar
  19. Peschl MF, Bottaro G, Hartner-Tiefenthaler M, Katharina R (2014) Learning how to innovate as a socio-epistemological process of co-creation. Towards a constructivist teaching strategy for innovation. Constr Found 9:27Google Scholar
  20. Peschl MF, Fundneider T (2012) Spaces enabling game-changing and sustaining innovations: why space matters for knowledge creation and innovation. J Organ Transform Soc Chang 9:41–61. doi: 10.1386/jots.9.1.41_1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sardinha L, Almeida AMP, Barbas MP (2017) Digital future classroom: the physical space and the inclusion of the NEET/Refugee population - conceptual and theoretical frameworks and methodology. In: INTED 2017 - 11th annual international technology, education and development conference. IATED, Valencia, Spain, pp 2396–2405Google Scholar
  22. Stenglin MK (2009) Space odyssey: towards a social semiotic model of three-dimensional space. Vis Commun 8:35–64. doi: 10.1177/1470357208099147 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Van Assche F, Anido-Rifón L, Griffiths D et al (eds) (2015) Re-engineering the uptake of ICT in schools. Springer International Publishing, ChamGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CIC.Digital/DigiMediaUniversity of AveiroAveiroPortugal
  2. 2.Santarém Higher School of EducationSantarémPortugal

Personalised recommendations