Sensor-Based Loops and Branches for Playback-Programmed Robot Systems
Usually, programming robot systems is expensive and complex and only profitable for companies with big lot sizes. Hence these systems do currently not play a big role in small or medium sized enterprises. This work extends the programming paradigm published in  that is based on the playback programming method, so that also sensor information can be used to generate more complex robot programs by means of playback programming in addition to the already existing functionality. This is achieved by developing a concept for sensor-based loops and branches that fits well to the programming paradigm. Finally, the enhanced programming system is evaluated in a user study with experts and non-experts with respect to its intuitiveness. The user study is divided into a part that tests the user interface and a part that evaluates the system as a whole, so that possible weak spots of the system or the user interface can be detected and can be taken into account in further work with this programming system.
KeywordsPlayback programming Sensor-based control structures Intuitive robot programming
This work has partly been supported by the Bayerische Forschungsstiftung (BFS) under the project FORobotics.
- 1.Riedl M, Baumgartl J, Henrich D (2016) Editing and synchronizing multi-robot playback programs. In: 47th international symposium on roboics - ISR 2016Google Scholar
- 2.Hägele M, Nilsson K, Pires JN (2008) Industrial robots. In: Springer handbook of robotics. Springer. 978-3-540-23957-4Google Scholar
- 4.Biggs G, Macdonald B (2003) A survey of robot programming systems. In: Proceedings of the Australasian conference on robotics and automation, CSIRO, p 27Google Scholar
- 6.Ardayfio D (1987) Fundamentals of robotics mechanical engineering. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York 978–0824774400Google Scholar
- 8.Meyer C, Hollmann R, Parlitz C, Hägele M (2007) Programmieren durch Vormachen für Assistenzsysteme - Schweiß- und Klebebahnen intuitiv programmieren. IT Inf Technol 49(4):238–246Google Scholar
- 12.Groth C, Henrich D (2014) One-shot robot programming by demonstration by adapting motion segments. In: 2014 IEEE international conference on robotics and biomimetics (ROBIO), pp 1068–1075, December 2014Google Scholar
- 13.Groth C, Henrich D (2014) One-shot robot programming by demonstration using an online oriented particles simulation. In: 2014 IEEE international conference on robotics and biomimetics (ROBIO), pp 154–160, December 2014Google Scholar
- 14.Orendt EM et al (2016) Robot programming by non-experts: intuitiveness and robustness of one-shot robot programming. In: 2016 IEEE 25th international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN)Google Scholar
- 15.Wegerich A, Löffler D, Maier A (2012) Handbuch zur IBIS ToolboxGoogle Scholar