Advertisement

Hardin’s One for All: Insights for Human Rights

  • Kimberly Stanton
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter reflects on the implications of Russell Hardin’s analysis of subjective group identification and the logic of group conflict for the work of human rights practitioners. After briefly recalling key elements in Hardin’s argument, the author posits that human rights work, often perceived as an idealistic undertaking, has an underlying strategic logic like that which One for All would lead us to expect. The fundamental goal of human rights work is to change existing societal coordination points in keeping with universalist rights norms. Human rights education seeks to shape the content of the knowledge from which people act, while the law-building approach, and efforts to create enforcement mechanisms including sanctions, work both to consolidate and strengthen rights norms, and to raise the costs of non-compliance. Hardin’s analysis of the dynamics of group conflict also has prescriptive implications for intervening to prevent or end violent conflict, by pointing to institutional and policy changes that have the potential to change the incentives groups face.

References

  1. BBC News. 2001. Kosovo Assault ‘Was Not Genocide’. September 7, 2001. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/1530781.stm. Accessed 17 May 2017.
  2. Freedom House. Freedom in the World. Available for Various Years at https://freedomhouse.org/report-types/freedom-world. Accessed 21 May 2017.
  3. Hardin, Russell. 1995. One for All. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. U.S. Department of State. 2017. Country Reports on Human Rights Practices. Available at https://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/. Accessed 21 May 2017.
  5. United Nations International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. 2017. ICTY Remembers: The Srebrenica Genocide 1995–2015. http://www.icty.org/specials/srebrenica20/?q=srebrenica20/. Accessed 21 May 2017.
  6. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. 2016. Record International Humanitarian Appeal Requires $22.2 Billion for 2017. December 5, 2016. https://www.unocha.org/story/record-international-humanitarian-appeal-requires-222-billion-2017. Accessed 21 May 2017.
  7. United Nations Office of High Commissioner for Human Rights. 2017. A Special Focus on Discrimination. Available at http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Discrimination/Pages/discrimination.aspx. Accessed 21 May 2017.
  8. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 1948. Available at http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/index.html. Accessed 21 May 2017.
  9. Zwierzchowski, Jan, and Ewa Tabeau. 2010. The 1992–1995 War in Bosnia and Herzogovina: Census-Based Multiple System Estimation of Casualties Undercount. February 1, 2010. http://www.icty.org/x/file/About/OTP/War_Demographics/en/bih_casualty_undercount_conf_paper_100201.pdf. Accessed 21 May 2017.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kimberly Stanton
    • 1
  1. 1.Tom Lantos Human Rights CommissionHouse Committee on Foreign AffairsWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations