AI and the Automation of Wisdom

Chapter
Part of the Philosophical Studies Series book series (PSSP, volume 128)

Abstract

This chapter identifies three challenges to human wisdom posed by ongoing advances in robotics, machine learning, and computer automation. Building upon an account of wisdom as moral or intellectual expertise enriched by the habit of responsible self-regulation in the light of holistic value judgments, I note that in many future labor contexts, machine expertise, or the semblance of it, will appear to be an increasingly expedient and attractive substitute for human expertise and wisdom. Moreover, existing technical, political, and economic conditions may well disrupt the historical pattern in which automation eventually creates new and enriched domains for the cultivation of human expertise and wisdom. I conclude that unless we challenge these conditions and assume responsibility for their effects, we risk wasting the vast positive potential of artificial intelligence and automation, which lies in their only acceptable use: namely, enlisting their power in the full support of our own moral and intellectual perfectibility, in the service of the growth of human wisdom for the benefit of ourselves and those who share our world.

Keywords

Wisdom Virtue ethics Machine intelligence Expertise Responsible self-regulation Algorithmic displacement Technological unemployment 

References

  1. Aristotle. (1999). Nicomachean ethics (T. Irwin, Trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  2. Beaudry, P., Green, D. A., & Sand, B. M. (2013). The great reversal in the demand for skill and cognitive tasks. National Bureau of Economic Research (Working Paper). doi: 10.3386/w18901.
  3. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  4. Carr, N. (2014). The glass cage: Automation and us. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  5. Cummings, M. L. (2004). Automation bias in intelligent time critical decision support systems. AIAA 1st intelligent systems technical conference. arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/6.2004-6313.
  6. Davis, M. (2012). Ain’t no one here but us social forces: Constructing the professional responsibility of engineers. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(1), 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Della Mirandola, P. (1496). Oration on the dignity of man (R. Hooker, Trans.). http://richard-hooker.com/sites/worldcultures/REN/REN.HTM. Accessed 20 Aug 2015.
  8. Dreyfus, H. (1992). What computers still can’t do: A critique of artificial reason. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  10. Ess, C. (2015). Commentary on the onlife manifesto. In L. Floridi (Ed.), The onlife manifesto: Being human in a hyperconnected era (pp. 17–20). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Feenberg, A. (1999). Questioning technology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Floridi, L. (2015). Present and foreseeable future of artificial intelligence. In F. Sabba (Ed.), Noetica versus informatica: Le nuove strutture della comunicazione scientifica (pp. 131–136). Florence: Olschki.Google Scholar
  13. Ford, M. (2015). Rise of the robots: Technology and the threat of a jobless future. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  14. Gent, E. (2015). Look out, scientists! AI solves 100-year old regeneration puzzle. Live Science, June 5. http://www.livescience.com/51107-artificial-intelligence-solves-regeneration-puzzle.html. Accessed 20 Aug 2015.
  15. Gerdes, A. (2014). Ethical issues concerning lethal autonomous robots in warfare. In J. Seibt, R. Hakli, & M. Norskov (Eds.), Sociable robots and the future of social relations (pp. 277–290). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  16. Grodzinsky, F., Miller, K., & Wolf, M. (2008). The ethics of designing artificial agents. Ethics and Information Technology, 10, 2–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jonas, H. (1984 [1979]). The imperative of responsibility: In search of an ethics for the technological age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kaplan, J. (2015). Humans need not apply: A guide to wealth and work in the age of artificial intelligence. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kelly, K. (2006). The seventh kingdom. The Technium. http://kk.org/thetechnium/the-seventh-kin/. Accessed 20 Aug 2015.
  20. Klein, G. (1997). The recognition-primed decision model. In C. E. Zsambok & G. Klein (Eds.), Naturalistic Decision Making (pp. 305–318). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  21. MIT Technology Review: Emerging Technology from the arXiv. (2015a, June 4). The emerging science of human computation.Google Scholar
  22. MIT Technology Review: Emerging Technology from the arXiv. (2015b, June 10). Machine vision algorithm chooses the most creative paintings in history.Google Scholar
  23. MIT Technology Review: Emerging Technology from the arXiv. (2015c). Deep learning machine beats humans in IQ test. June 12.Google Scholar
  24. Osborne, M., & Frey, C. B. (2013). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerization? Working paper of Oxford Martin Programme on the Impacts of Future Technology (pp. 1–72). http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2015.
  25. Reed, R. C. (2013). Euthyphro’s elenchus experience: Ethical expertise and self-knowledge. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 16, 245–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rifkin, J. (1995). The end of work: The decline of the global labor force and the dawn of the post-market era. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
  27. Rousseau, J-J. (1992 [1755]). Discourse on the origin of inequality (D. A. Cress, Trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  28. Sartre, J-P. (2007 [1946]). Existentialism is a humanism. Trans. C. Macomber. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Scheutz, M. (2012). The inherent dangers of unidirectional emotional bonds between humans and social robots. In P. Lin, K. Abney, & G. A. Bekey (Eds.), Robot ethics (pp. 205–222). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. Schmidt, M., & Lipson, H. (2009). Distilling free-form natural laws from experimental data. Science, 324(5923), 81–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Simon, J. (2015). Distributed epistemic responsibility in a hyperconnected era. In L. Floridi (Ed.), The onlife manifesto: Being human in a hyperconnected era (pp. 145–159). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. Swartwood, J. D. (2013). Wisdom as an expert skill. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 16, 511–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Symons, J., & Horner, J. (2014). Software-intensive science. Philosophy and Technology, 27(3), 461–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vallor, S. (2016). Technology and the virtues: A philosophical guide to a future worth wanting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wallach, W., & Allen, C. (2009). Moral machines: Teaching robots right from wrong. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Waltz, D., & Buchanan, B. G. (2009). Automating science. Science, 324(5923), 43–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophySanta Clara UniversitySanta ClaraUSA

Personalised recommendations